IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0163753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary Diversification of Prey and Predator Species Facilitated by Asymmetric Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Zu
  • Jinliang Wang
  • Gang Huang

Abstract

We investigate the influence of asymmetric interactions on coevolutionary dynamics of a predator-prey system by using the theory of adaptive dynamics. We assume that the defense ability of prey and the attack ability of predators all can adaptively evolve, either caused by phenotypic plasticity or by behavioral choice, but there are certain costs in terms of their growth rate or death rate. The coevolutionary model is constructed from a deterministic approximation of random mutation-selection process. To sum up, if prey’s trade-off curve is globally weakly concave, then five outcomes of coevolution are demonstrated, which depend on the intensity and shape of asymmetric predator-prey interactions and predator’s trade-off shape. Firstly, we find that if there is a weakly decelerating cost and a weakly accelerating benefit for predator species, then evolutionary branching in the predator species may occur, but after branching further coevolution may lead to extinction of the predator species with a larger trait value. However, if there is a weakly accelerating cost and a weakly accelerating benefit for predator species, then evolutionary branching in the predator species is also possible and after branching the dimorphic predator can evolutionarily stably coexist with a monomorphic prey species. Secondly, if the asymmetric interactions become a little strong, then prey and predators will evolve to an evolutionarily stable equilibrium, at which they can stably coexist on a long-term timescale of evolution. Thirdly, if there is a weakly accelerating cost and a relatively strongly accelerating benefit for prey species, then evolutionary branching in the prey species is possible and the finally coevolutionary outcome contains a dimorphic prey and a monomorphic predator species. Fourthly, if the asymmetric interactions become more stronger, then predator-prey coevolution may lead to cycles in both traits and equilibrium population densities. The Red Queen dynamic is a possible outcome under asymmetric predator-prey interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Zu & Jinliang Wang & Gang Huang, 2016. "Evolutionary Diversification of Prey and Predator Species Facilitated by Asymmetric Interactions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0163753
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163753
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163753&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0163753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. U. Dieckmann & M. Doebeli, 1999. "On the Origin of Species by Sympatric Speciation," Working Papers ir99013, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    2. Ulf Dieckmann & Michael Doebeli, 1999. "On the origin of species by sympatric speciation," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6742), pages 354-357, July.
    3. P. Marrow & U. Dieckmann & R. Law, 1996. "Evolutionary Dynamics of Predator-Prey Systems: An Ecological Perspective," Working Papers wp96002, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Åke Brännström & Jacob Johansson & Niels Von Festenberg, 2013. "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Adaptive Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, June.
    2. E. Kisdi & F.J.A. Jacobs & S.A.H. Geritz, 2000. "Red Queen Evolution by Cycles of Evolutionary Branching and Extinction," Working Papers ir00030, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    3. Zu, Jian & Wang, Jinliang, 2013. "Adaptive evolution of attack ability promotes the evolutionary branching of predator species," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-23.
    4. Débarre, Florence & Otto, Sarah P., 2016. "Evolutionary dynamics of a quantitative trait in a finite asexual population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 75-88.
    5. Jonathan Newton, 2017. "The preferences of Homo Moralis are unstable under evolving assortativity," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 583-589, May.
    6. Alexandros Rigos & Heinrich H. Nax, 2015. "Assortativity evolving from social dilemmas," Discussion Papers in Economics 15/19, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    7. Chaianunporn, Thotsapol & Hovestadt, Thomas, 2012. "Concurrent evolution of random dispersal and habitat niche width in host-parasitoid systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 241-250.
    8. Blath, Jochen & Paul, Tobias & Tóbiás, András & Wilke Berenguer, Maite, 2024. "The impact of dormancy on evolutionary branching," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 66-76.
    9. Boettiger, Carl & Dushoff, Jonathan & Weitz, Joshua S., 2010. "Fluctuation domains in adaptive evolution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 6-13.
    10. Michael B. Doud & Animesh Gupta & Victor Li & Sarah J. Medina & Caesar A. Fuente & Justin R. Meyer, 2024. "Competition-driven eco-evolutionary feedback reshapes bacteriophage lambda’s fitness landscape and enables speciation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Svardal, Hannes & Rueffler, Claus & Hermisson, Joachim, 2015. "A general condition for adaptive genetic polymorphism in temporally and spatially heterogeneous environments," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 76-97.
    12. Costa, Carolina L.N. & Marquitti, Flavia M.D. & Perez, S. Ivan & Schneider, David M. & Ramos, Marlon F. & de Aguiar, Marcus A.M., 2018. "Registering the evolutionary history in individual-based models of speciation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.
    14. Champagnat, Nicolas, 2006. "A microscopic interpretation for adaptive dynamics trait substitution sequence models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 116(8), pages 1127-1160, August.
    15. Matessi, Carlo & Schneider, Kristan A., 2009. "Optimization under frequency-dependent selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 1-12.
    16. Gong, Yubing & Wang, Li & Xu, Bo, 2012. "Delay-induced diversity of firing behavior and ordered chaotic firing in adaptive neuronal networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 548-553.
    17. Ziwei Wang & Jiabin Wu, 2023. "Partner Choice and Morality: Preference Evolution under Stable Matching," Papers 2304.11504, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    18. Bagnoli, Franco & Guardiani, Carlo, 2005. "A model of sympatric speciation through assortative mating," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 347(C), pages 534-574.
    19. György Barabás & Christine Parent & Andrew Kraemer & Frederik Perre & Frederik Laender, 2022. "The evolution of trait variance creates a tension between species diversity and functional diversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Bhattacharyay, A. & Drossel, B., 2005. "Modeling coevolution and sympatric speciation of flowers and pollinators," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 345(1), pages 159-172.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0163753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.