IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0144785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an In-Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for the Chinese Population

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Wei
  • Xin-liang Wang
  • Hao-bin Yang
  • Tu-bao Yang

Abstract

Background: Patients’ satisfaction has been considered as a crucial measurement of health care quality. Our objective was to develop a reliable and practical questionnaire for the assessment of in-patients’ satisfaction in Chinese people, and report the current situation of in-patients’ satisfaction in the central south area of China through a large-scale cross-sectional study. Design: In order to generate the questionnaire, we reviewed previous studies, interviewed related people, held discussions, refined questionnaire items after the pilot study, and finally conducted a large cross-sectional survey to test the questionnaire. Setting: This study was conducted in three A-level hospitals in the Hunan province, China. Results: There were 6640 patients in this large-scale survey (another 695 patients in the pilot study). A factor analysis on the data from the pilot study generated four dimensions, namely, doctors’ care quality, nurses’ care quality, quality of the environment and facilities, and comprehensive quality. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for each dimension were above 0.7 and the inter-subscale correlation was between 0.72 and 0.83. The overall in-patient satisfaction rate was 89.6%. Conclusion: The in-patient satisfaction questionnaire was proved to have optimal internal consistency, reliability, and validity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Wei & Xin-liang Wang & Hao-bin Yang & Tu-bao Yang, 2015. "Development of an In-Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for the Chinese Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0144785
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144785
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144785&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0144785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0144785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.