IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0125335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perils of Adapting to Dose Errors in Radiation Therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Velibor V Mišić
  • Timothy C Y Chan

Abstract

We consider adaptive robust methods for lung cancer that are also dose-reactive, wherein the treatment is modified after each treatment session to account for the dose delivered in prior treatment sessions. Such methods are of interest because they potentially allow for errors in the delivered dose to be corrected as the treatment progresses, thereby ensuring that the tumor receives a sufficient dose at the end of the treatment. We show through a computational study with real lung cancer patient data that while dose reaction is beneficial with respect to the final dose distribution, it may lead to exaggerated daily underdose and overdose relative to non-reactive methods that grows as the treatment progresses. However, by combining dose reaction with a mechanism for updating an estimate of the uncertainty, the magnitude of this growth can be mitigated substantially. The key finding of this paper is that reacting to dose errors – an adaptation strategy that is both simple and intuitively appealing – may backfire and lead to treatments that are clinically unacceptable.

Suggested Citation

  • Velibor V Mišić & Timothy C Y Chan, 2015. "The Perils of Adapting to Dose Errors in Radiation Therapy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125335
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125335
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125335&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0125335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Bortfeld & Timothy C. Y. Chan & Alexei Trofimov & John N. Tsitsiklis, 2008. "Robust Management of Motion Uncertainty in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1461-1473, December.
    2. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Mišić, Velibor V., 2013. "Adaptive and robust radiation therapy optimization for lung cancer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 745-756.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saghafian, Soroush & Trichakis, Nikolaos & Zhu, Ruihao & Shih, Helen A., 2019. "Joint Patient Selection and Scheduling under No-Shows: Theory and Application in Proton Therapy," Working Paper Series rwp19-019, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Mehdi Karimi & Somayeh Moazeni & Levent Tunçel, 2018. "A Utility Theory Based Interactive Approach to Robustness in Linear Optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 811-842, April.
    3. Danielle A. Ripsman & Thomas G. Purdie & Timothy C. Y. Chan & Houra Mahmoudzadeh, 2022. "Robust Direct Aperture Optimization for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2017-2038, July.
    4. Wei Chen & Yixin Lu & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Designing Personalized Treatment Plans for Breast Cancer," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 932-949, September.
    5. Soroush Saghafian & Nikolaos Trichakis & Ruihao Zhu & Helen A. Shih, 2023. "Joint patient selection and scheduling under no‐shows: Theory and application in proton therapy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 547-563, February.
    6. Arkajyoti Roy & Shaunak S. Dabadghao & Ahmadreza Marandi, 2024. "Value of intermediate imaging in adaptive robust radiotherapy planning to manage radioresistance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1307-1328, August.
    7. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Mahmoudzadeh, Houra & Purdie, Thomas G., 2014. "A robust-CVaR optimization approach with application to breast cancer therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 876-885.
    8. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    9. Justin J. Boutilier & Timothy C. Y. Chan, 2023. "Introducing and Integrating Machine Learning in an Operations Research Curriculum: An Application-Driven Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 64-83, January.
    10. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Mišić, Velibor V., 2013. "Adaptive and robust radiation therapy optimization for lung cancer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 745-756.
    11. Vishal Gupta & Brian Rongqing Han & Song-Hee Kim & Hyung Paek, 2020. "Maximizing Intervention Effectiveness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5576-5598, December.
    12. Dominic J. Breuer & Shashank Kapadia & Nadia Lahrichi & James C. Benneyan, 2022. "Joint robust optimization of bed capacity, nurse staffing, and care access under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 673-689, May.
    13. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Kaw, Neal, 2020. "Inverse optimization for the recovery of constraint parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 415-427.
    14. Marleen Balvert & Dick den Hertog & Aswin L. Hoffmann, 2019. "Robust Optimization of Dose-Volume Metrics for Prostate HDR-Brachytherapy Incorporating Target and OAR Volume Delineation Uncertainties," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 100-114, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.