IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0117661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preoperative Evaluation of the Histological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Chen
  • Mingpeng Wu
  • Rongbo Liu
  • Siyi Li
  • Ronghui Gao
  • Bin Song

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the preoperative prediction of the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in several authoritative databases to identify relevant articles. QUADAS-2 was used to assess the quality of included studies. Data were extracted to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were derived and areas under the SROC curve (AUC) were computed to indicate the diagnostic accuracy. Heterogeneity test, meta-regression analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to identify factors and studies contributed to the heterogeneity. Results: A total of 11 studies with 912 HCCs were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR and NLR with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 0.54(0.47–0.61), 0.90(0.87–0.93), 4.88(2.99–7.97) and 0.46(0.27–0.77) for the prediction of well-differentiated HCC (w-HCC), 0.84(0.78–0.89), 0.48(0.43–0.52), 2.29(1.43–3.69) and 0.30(0.22–0.41) for the prediction of poorly-differentiated HCC (p-HCC). The AUC were 0.9311 and 0.8513 in predicting w-HCC and p-HCC, respectively. Results were further evaluated according to the method of image interpretation. Significant heterogeneity was observed. Conclusion: DWI had excellent and moderately high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of w-HCC and p-HCC, respectively. Nonetheless, further studies in larger populations and an optimized image acquisition and interpretation are required before DWI-derived parameters can be used as a useful image biomarker for the prediction of the histological grade of HCC.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Chen & Mingpeng Wu & Rongbo Liu & Siyi Li & Ronghui Gao & Bin Song, 2015. "Preoperative Evaluation of the Histological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117661
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117661
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117661&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0117661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikola Panic & Emanuele Leoncini & Giulio de Belvis & Walter Ricciardi & Stefania Boccia, 2013. "Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    2. L.R. Arends & T.H. Hamza & J.C. van Houwelingen & M.H. Heijenbrok-Kal & M.G.M. Hunink & T. Stijnen, 2008. "Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of ROC Curves," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(5), pages 621-638, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang Li & Chenxia Li & Rong Wang & Juan Ren & Jian Yang & Yuelang Zhang, 2015. "Combined Application of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Diagnosis of Chronic Liver Disease-Induced Hepatocellular Carcinom," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe La Torre & Remigio Bova & Rosario Andrea Cocchiara & Cristina Sestili & Anna Tagliaferri & Simona Maggiacomo & Camilla Foschi & William Zomparelli & Maria Vittoria Manai & David Shaholli & Va, 2023. "What Are the Determinants of the Quality of Systematic Reviews in the International Journals of Occupational Medicine? A Methodological Study Review of Published Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Terje Gjøsæter & Jaziar Radianti & Weiqin Chen, 2021. "Universal Design of ICT for Emergency Management from Stakeholders’ Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1213-1225, September.
    3. Ruili Wei & Chaonan Wang & Fangping He & Lirong Hong & Jie Zhang & Wangxiao Bao & Fangxia Meng & Benyan Luo, 2019. "Prediction of poor outcome after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by diffusion-weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Diah Chaerani & Adibah Shuib & Tomy Perdana & Athaya Zahrani Irmansyah, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Robust Optimization in Solving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Problems during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Marimuthu, Malliga & D'Souza, Clare & Shukla, Yupal, 2022. "Integrating community value into the adoption framework: A systematic review of conceptual research on participatory smart city applications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Himanshu Rai & Nakul Sinha & Sudeep Kumar & Ajay Kumar Sharma & Suraksha Agrawal, 2016. "Interleukin-1 Gene Cluster Polymorphisms and Their Association with Coronary Artery Disease: Separate Evidences from the Largest Case-Control Study amongst North Indians and an Updated Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Jacques Simon Song & Georges Ngnouwal Eloundou & Fabrice Bitoto Ewolo & Blaise Ondoua Beyene, 2024. "Does Social Media Contribute to Economic Growth?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8349-8389, June.
    9. Claudia Menéndez & Lucía Batalla & Alba Prieto & Miguel Ángel Rodríguez & Irene Crespo & Hugo Olmedillas, 2020. "Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Novice and Recreational Runners: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Jin Lin & Jian Liu & Michael L Davies & Weiqian Chen, 2016. "Serum Vitamin D Level and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity: Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos, 2018. "On composite likelihood in bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(2), pages 211-227, April.
    12. Helmut Beichler & Igor Grabovac & Thomas E. Dorner, 2023. "Integrated Care as a Model for Interprofessional Disease Management and the Benefits for People Living with HIV/AIDS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Victoria T Hunniford & Joshua Montroy & Dean A Fergusson & Marc T Avey & Kimberley E Wever & Sarah K McCann & Madison Foster & Grace Fox & Mackenzie Lafreniere & Mira Ghaly & Sydney Mannell & Karolina, 2021. "Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of preclinical systematic reviews," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Hyun-Duck Kim & Angelita Bautista Cruz, 2022. "Transformational Leadership and Psychological Well-Being of Service-Oriented Staff: Hybrid Data Synthesis Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Jeroen P M Peters & Lotty Hooft & Wilko Grolman & Inge Stegeman, 2015. "Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-11, August.
    16. Philipp Doebler & Heinz Holling, 2015. "Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and ROC Curves with Covariate Adjusted Semiparametric Mixtures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1084-1104, December.
    17. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2022. "Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Miguel Ángel Rodríguez & José Víctor Piedra & Mario Sánchez-Fernández & Miguel del Valle & Irene Crespo & Hugo Olmedillas, 2020. "A Matter of Degrees: A Systematic Review of the Ergogenic Effect of Pre-Cooling in Highly Trained Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Rafael Deminice & Diogo Farias Ribeiro & Fernando Tadeu Trevisan Frajacomo, 2016. "The Effects of Acute Exercise and Exercise Training on Plasma Homocysteine: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Giulia Lausi & Alessandra Pizzo & Clarissa Cricenti & Michela Baldi & Rita Desiderio & Anna Maria Giannini & Emanuela Mari, 2021. "Intimate Partner Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of the Phenomenon from Victims’ and Help Professionals’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.