IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8660-d448935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objectively Measured Sedentary Behavior and Physical Fitness in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fernanda M. Silva

    (Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Pedro Duarte-Mendes

    (Department of Sports and Well-being, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6000-266 Castelo Branco, Portugal
    Sport, Health & Exercise Research Unit (SHERU), Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6000-266 Castelo Branco, Portugal)

  • Marcio Cascante Rusenhack

    (Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal
    School of Physical Education and Sports, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica)

  • Meirielly Furmann

    (Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Community Development, State University of the Midwest, Irati Paraná 84505-677, Brazil)

  • Paulo Renato Nobre

    (Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Miguel Ângelo Fachada

    (Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Carlos M. Soares

    (Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Ana Teixeira

    (Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • José Pedro Ferreira

    (Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

Background : Sedentary behavior has been considered an independent risk factor to health. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine associations between objectively measured sedentary time and physical fitness components in healthy adults. Methods : Four electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Sport Discus) were searched (up to 20 September 2020) to retrieve studies on healthy adults which used observational, cohort and cross-sectional designs. Studies were included if sedentary time was measured objectively and examined associations with the health- or skill-related attributes of physical fitness (e.g., muscular strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, balance). After applying additional search criteria, 21 papers (11,101 participants) were selected from an initial pool of 5192 identified papers. Results : Significant negative associations were found between total sedentary time with cardiorespiratory fitness (r = −0.164, 95%CI: −0.240, −0.086, p < 0.001), muscular strength (r = −0.147, 95%CI: −0.266, −0.024, p = 0.020) and balance (r = −0.133, 95%CI: −0.255, −0.006, p = 0.040). Conclusions : The evidence found suggests that sedentary time can be associated with poor physical fitness in adults (i.e., muscular strength, cardiorespiratory fitness and balance), so strategies should be created to encourage behavioral changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernanda M. Silva & Pedro Duarte-Mendes & Marcio Cascante Rusenhack & Meirielly Furmann & Paulo Renato Nobre & Miguel Ângelo Fachada & Carlos M. Soares & Ana Teixeira & José Pedro Ferreira, 2020. "Objectively Measured Sedentary Behavior and Physical Fitness in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8660-:d:448935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8660/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8660/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikola Panic & Emanuele Leoncini & Giulio de Belvis & Walter Ricciardi & Stefania Boccia, 2013. "Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Jeroen H. P. M. Van der Velde & Hans H. C. M. Savelberg & Nicolaas C. Schaper & Annemarie Koster, 2015. "Moderate Activity and Fitness, Not Sedentary Time, Are Independently Associated with Cardio-Metabolic Risk in U.S. Adults Aged 18–49," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Fernanda M. Silva & João Petrica & João Serrano & Rui Paulo & André Ramalho & Dineia Lucas & José Pedro Ferreira & Pedro Duarte-Mendes, 2019. "The Sedentary Time and Physical Activity Levels on Physical Fitness in the Elderly: A Comparative Cross Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-11, October.
    4. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. George Danut Mocanu & Gabriel Murariu & Ilie Onu & Georgian Badicu, 2022. "The Influence of Gender and the Specificity of Sports Activities on the Performance of Body Balance for Students of the Faculty of Physical Education and Sports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Lilian Krist & Christina Dornquast & Thomas Reinhold & Katja Icke & Ina Danquah & Stefan N. Willich & Heiko Becher & Thomas Keil, 2021. "Predictors of Changes in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Turkish Migrant Cohort in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Jae-Min Park & Ja-Eun Choi & Hye Sun Lee & Soyoung Jeon & Ji-Won Lee & Kyung-Won Hong, 2022. "Effect of Walking Steps Measured by a Wearable Activity Tracker on Improving Components of Metabolic Syndrome: A Prospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Carlos Farinha & Ana Maria Teixeira & João Serrano & Hélder Santos & Maria João Campos & Bárbara Oliveiros & Fernanda M. Silva & Márcio Cascante-Rusenhack & Paulo Luís & José Pedro Ferreira, 2021. "Impact of Different Aquatic Exercise Programs on Body Composition, Functional Fitness and Cognitive Function of Non-Institutionalized Elderly Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe La Torre & Remigio Bova & Rosario Andrea Cocchiara & Cristina Sestili & Anna Tagliaferri & Simona Maggiacomo & Camilla Foschi & William Zomparelli & Maria Vittoria Manai & David Shaholli & Va, 2023. "What Are the Determinants of the Quality of Systematic Reviews in the International Journals of Occupational Medicine? A Methodological Study Review of Published Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Rafael Deminice & Diogo Farias Ribeiro & Fernando Tadeu Trevisan Frajacomo, 2016. "The Effects of Acute Exercise and Exercise Training on Plasma Homocysteine: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Daisuke Kato & Yuki Kataoka & Erfen Gustiawan Suwangto & Makoto Kaneko & Hideki Wakabayashi & Daisuke Son & Ichiro Kawachi, 2020. "Reporting Guidelines for Community-Based Participatory Research Did Not Improve the Reporting Quality of Published Studies: A Systematic Review of Studies on Smoking Cessation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-9, May.
    4. Claudia Valderrama-Ulloa & Ximena Ferrada & Felipe Herrera, 2023. "Breaking Down Barriers: Findings from a Literature Review on Housing for People with Disabilities in Latin America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Padhraig S Fleming & Despina Koletsi & Nikolaos Pandis, 2014. "Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-7, May.
    7. Jorge Sepúlveda-Velásquez & Pablo Tapia-Griñen & Boris Pastén-Henríquez, 2023. "Financial effects of natural disasters: a bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 2691-2710, September.
    8. Danlu Liu & Jiaxin Jin & Jinhui Tian & Kehu Yang, 2015. "Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Endoscopic Ultrasound Diagnosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Fernianda Rahayu Hermiatin & Yuanita Handayati & Tomy Perdana & Dadan Wardhana, 2022. "Creating Food Value Chain Transformations through Regional Food Hubs: A Review Article," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Victoria T Hunniford & Joshua Montroy & Dean A Fergusson & Marc T Avey & Kimberley E Wever & Sarah K McCann & Madison Foster & Grace Fox & Mackenzie Lafreniere & Mira Ghaly & Sydney Mannell & Karolina, 2021. "Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of preclinical systematic reviews," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Jeroen P M Peters & Lotty Hooft & Wilko Grolman & Inge Stegeman, 2015. "Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-11, August.
    12. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2022. "Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    13. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    14. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    18. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    19. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8660-:d:448935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.