IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0113563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Time Course of Corticospinal Excitability during a Simple Reaction Time Task

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Kennefick
  • Dana Maslovat
  • Anthony N Carlsen

Abstract

The production of movement in a simple reaction time task can be separated into two time periods: the foreperiod, which is thought to include preparatory processes, and the reaction time interval, which includes initiation processes. To better understand these processes, transcranial magnetic stimulation has been used to probe corticospinal excitability at various time points during response preparation and initiation. Previous research has shown that excitability decreases prior to the “go” stimulus and increases following the “go”; however these two time frames have been examined independently. The purpose of this study was to measure changes in CE during both the foreperiod and reaction time interval in a single experiment, relative to a resting baseline level. Participants performed a button press movement in a simple reaction time task and excitability was measured during rest, the foreperiod, and the reaction time interval. Results indicated that during the foreperiod, excitability levels quickly increased from baseline with the presentation of the warning signal, followed by a period of stable excitability leading up to the “go” signal, and finally a rapid increase in excitability during the reaction time interval. This excitability time course is consistent with neural activation models that describe movement preparation and response initiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Kennefick & Dana Maslovat & Anthony N Carlsen, 2014. "The Time Course of Corticospinal Excitability during a Simple Reaction Time Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-7, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0113563
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113563
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113563&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0113563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Hallett, 2000. "Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6792), pages 147-150, July.
    2. Yifat Prut & Eberhard E. Fetz, 1999. "Primate spinal interneurons show pre-movement instructed delay activity," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6753), pages 590-594, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Hoegl & Hartmut Heinrich & Wolfgang Barth & Friedrich Lösel & Gunther H Moll & Oliver Kratz, 2012. "Time Course Analysis of Motor Excitability in a Response Inhibition Task According to the Level of Hyperactivity and Impulsivity in Children with ADHD," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Nelson Espinosa & Jorge Mariño & Carmen de Labra & Javier Cudeiro, 2011. "Cortical Modulation of the Transient Visual Response at Thalamic Level: A TMS Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Felix Duecker & Tom A de Graaf & Christianne Jacobs & Alexander T Sack, 2013. "Time- and Task-Dependent Non-Neural Effects of Real and Sham TMS," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
    4. Liu, Dan & Zhao, Song & Luo, Xiaoyuan & Yuan, Yi, 2021. "Synchronization for fractional-order extended Hindmarsh-Rose neuronal models with magneto-acoustical stimulation input," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Saeka Tomatsu & GeeHee Kim & Shinji Kubota & Kazuhiko Seki, 2023. "Presynaptic gating of monkey proprioceptive signals for proper motor action," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Kazumasa Uehara & Takuya Morishita & Shinji Kubota & Kozo Funase, 2013. "Change in the Ipsilateral Motor Cortex Excitability Is Independent from a Muscle Contraction Phase during Unilateral Repetitive Isometric Contractions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, January.
    7. Nyeonju Kang & James H Cauraugh, 2017. "Does non-invasive brain stimulation reduce essential tremor? A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Tanner C Dixon & Christina M Merrick & Joni D Wallis & Richard B Ivry & Jose M Carmena, 2021. "Hybrid dedicated and distributed coding in PMd/M1 provides separation and interaction of bilateral arm signals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-35, November.
    9. Arran T Reader & H Henrik Ehrsson, 2019. "Weakening the subjective sensation of own hand ownership does not interfere with rapid finger movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Huimin Li & Jianle Lin & Shuxin Lin & Haojie Zhong & Bowei Jiang & Xinghui Liu & Weisheng Wu & Weiwei Li & Emad Iranmanesh & Zhongyi Zhou & Wenjun Li & Kai Wang, 2024. "A bioinspired tactile scanner for computer haptics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0113563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.