IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0051293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incestuous Sisters: Mate Preference for Brothers over Unrelated Males in Drosophila melanogaster

Author

Listed:
  • Adeline Loyau
  • Jérémie H Cornuau
  • Jean Clobert
  • Étienne Danchin

Abstract

The literature is full of examples of inbreeding avoidance, while recent mathematical models predict that inbreeding tolerance or even inbreeding preference should be expected under several realistic conditions like e.g. polygyny. We investigated male and female mate preferences with respect to relatedness in the fruit fly D. melanogaster. Experiments offered the choice between a first order relative (full-sibling or parent) and an unrelated individual with the same age and mating history. We found that females significantly preferred mating with their brothers, thus supporting inbreeding preference. Moreover, females did not avoid mating with their fathers, and males did not avoid mating with their sisters, thus supporting inbreeding tolerance. Our experiments therefore add empirical evidence for inbreeding preference, which strengthens the prediction that inbreeding tolerance and preference can evolve under specific circumstances through the positive effects on inclusive fitness.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeline Loyau & Jérémie H Cornuau & Jean Clobert & Étienne Danchin, 2012. "Incestuous Sisters: Mate Preference for Brothers over Unrelated Males in Drosophila melanogaster," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0051293
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051293&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0051293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald Blomqvist & Malte Andersson & Clemens Küpper & Innes C. Cuthill & János Kis & Richard B. Lanctot & Brett K. Sandercock & Tamás Székely & Johan Wallander & Bart Kempenaers, 2002. "Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6907), pages 613-615, October.
    2. Debra Lieberman & John Tooby & Leda Cosmides, 2007. "The architecture of human kin detection," Nature, Nature, vol. 445(7129), pages 727-731, February.
    3. Bengt Hansson & Lucy Jack & Julian K. Christians & Josephine M. Pemberton & Mikael Åkesson & Helena Westerdahl & Staffan Bensch & Dennis Hasselquist, 2007. "No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a great reed warbler population," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 157-164, January.
    4. J. I. Hoffman & J. Forcada & P. N. Trathan & W. Amos, 2007. "Female fur seals show active choice for males that are heterozygous and unrelated," Nature, Nature, vol. 445(7130), pages 912-914, February.
    5. Ian G. Jamieson & Sabrina S. Taylor & Lisa N. Tracy & Hanna Kokko & Doug P. Armstrong, 2009. "Why some species of birds do not avoid inbreeding: insights from New Zealand robins and saddlebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 575-584.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia Brekke & Jinliang Wang & Peter M. Bennett & Phillip Cassey & Deborah A. Dawson & Gavin J. Horsburgh & John G. Ewen, 2012. "Postcopulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in the island endemic hihi (Notiomystis cincta)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 278-284.
    2. Jussi S. Alho & Céline Teplitsky & James A. Mills & John W. Yarrall & Juha Merilä, 2012. "No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through active mate choice in red-billed gulls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 672-675.
    3. Jarne, C. & Gómez Albarracín, F.A. & Caruso, M., 2021. "An algorithm to represent inbreeding trees," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    4. Hazel J. Nichols & Michael A. Cant & Jennifer L. Sanderson, 2015. "Adjustment of costly extra-group paternity according to inbreeding risk in a cooperative mammal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1486-1494.
    5. Francesconi, Marco & Ghiglino, Christian & Perry, Motty, 2009. "On the Origin of the Family," IZA Discussion Papers 4637, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Herring, David J., 2009. "Fathers and child maltreatment: A research agenda based on evolutionary theory and behavioral biology research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 935-945, August.
    7. Annie C Spokes & Elizabeth S Spelke, 2018. "At 4.5 but not 5.5 years, children favor kin when the stakes are moderately high," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Linus Andersson, 2020. "Oh half-brother, where art thou? The boundaries of full- and half-sibling interaction," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(16), pages 431-460.
    9. A Bradley Duthie & Jane M Reid, 2015. "What Happens after Inbreeding Avoidance? Inbreeding by Rejected Relatives and the Inclusive Fitness Benefit of Inbreeding Avoidance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Hanne C Lie & Leigh W Simmons & Gillian Rhodes, 2009. "Does Genetic Diversity Predict Health in Humans?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-7, July.
    11. Matthijs van Veelen & Benjamin Allen & Moshe Hoffman & Burton Simon & Carl Veller, 2016. "Inclusive Fitness," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-055/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. DECLERCK, Carolyn H. & BOONE, Christophe & KIYONARI, Toko, 2008. "Oxytocin and cooperative behavior in social dilemmas: The moderating role of explicit incentives, social cues and individual differences," Working Papers 2008014, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    13. Aslihan Akdeniz & Christopher Graser & Matthijs van Veelen, 2020. "Homo Moralis and regular altruists – preference evolution for when they disagree," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-062/I, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0051293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.