IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i3p672-675..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through active mate choice in red-billed gulls

Author

Listed:
  • Jussi S. Alho
  • Céline Teplitsky
  • James A. Mills
  • John W. Yarrall
  • Juha Merilä

Abstract

Except for cooperative breeders, most studies on wild birds have failed to find evidence for inbreeding avoidance via kin discriminative mate choice. This, together with evidence for kin avoidance through dispersal, has led to the general view that dispersal is often a sufficient inbreeding avoidance mechanism and active discrimination through mate choice is unnecessary. Yet, the study of inbreeding avoidance in the wild is difficult and long-term studies of pedigreed wild populations can provide important insights. We studied the occurrence of inbreeding avoidance in a highly philopatric red-billed gull (Larus novaehollandiae scopulinus) population subject to an individual-based field study since 1958 in Kaikoura, New Zealand. Despite a wealth of breeding and pedigree data, we did not observe a single inbred pair. This observation was a small but significant deviation from the expectation under the null hypothesis of random mating when we looked at annual breeding attempts, suggesting inbreeding avoidance. However, the difference disappeared when we examined pair bonds rather than annual breeding attempts. Our results are consistent with the expectation that close inbreeding occurs rarely in large random-mating populations. They also demonstrate how mating systems, in this case long-term monogamous pair bonds with sex differences both in the age of first breeding and breeding dispersal at natal subcolonies, can reduce the likelihood of inbreeding.

Suggested Citation

  • Jussi S. Alho & Céline Teplitsky & James A. Mills & John W. Yarrall & Juha Merilä, 2012. "No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through active mate choice in red-billed gulls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 672-675.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:672-675.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian G. Jamieson & Sabrina S. Taylor & Lisa N. Tracy & Hanna Kokko & Doug P. Armstrong, 2009. "Why some species of birds do not avoid inbreeding: insights from New Zealand robins and saddlebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 575-584.
    2. Bengt Hansson & Lucy Jack & Julian K. Christians & Josephine M. Pemberton & Mikael Åkesson & Helena Westerdahl & Staffan Bensch & Dennis Hasselquist, 2007. "No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a great reed warbler population," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 157-164, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheila M. Reynolds & J. Albert C. Uy & Gail L. Patricelli & Seth W. Coleman & Michael J. Braun & Gerald Borgia, 2014. "Tests of the kin selection model of mate choice and inbreeding avoidance in satin bowerbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 1005-1014.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia Brekke & Jinliang Wang & Peter M. Bennett & Phillip Cassey & Deborah A. Dawson & Gavin J. Horsburgh & John G. Ewen, 2012. "Postcopulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in the island endemic hihi (Notiomystis cincta)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 278-284.
    2. Adeline Loyau & Jérémie H Cornuau & Jean Clobert & Étienne Danchin, 2012. "Incestuous Sisters: Mate Preference for Brothers over Unrelated Males in Drosophila melanogaster," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-6, December.
    3. A Bradley Duthie & Jane M Reid, 2015. "What Happens after Inbreeding Avoidance? Inbreeding by Rejected Relatives and the Inclusive Fitness Benefit of Inbreeding Avoidance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Jarne, C. & Gómez Albarracín, F.A. & Caruso, M., 2021. "An algorithm to represent inbreeding trees," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:672-675.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.