IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i1p157-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a great reed warbler population

Author

Listed:
  • Bengt Hansson
  • Lucy Jack
  • Julian K. Christians
  • Josephine M. Pemberton
  • Mikael Åkesson
  • Helena Westerdahl
  • Staffan Bensch
  • Dennis Hasselquist

Abstract

Inbreeding depression may drive the evolution of inbreeding avoidance through dispersal and mate choice. In birds, many species show female-biased dispersal, which is an effective inbreeding avoidance mechanism. In contrast, there is scarce evidence in birds for kin discriminative mate choice, which may, at least partly, reflect difficulties detecting it. First, kin discrimination may be realized as dispersal, and this is difficult to distinguish from other causes of dispersal. Second, even within small, isolated populations, it is often difficult to determine the potential candidates available to a female when choosing a mate. We sought evidence for inbreeding avoidance via kin discrimination in a breeding population of great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) studied over 17 years. Inbreeding depression is strong in the population, suggesting that it would be adaptive to avoid relatives as mates. Detailed data on timing of settlement and mate search movements made it possible to identify candidate mates for each female, and long-term pedigrees and resolved parentage enabled us to estimate relatedness between females and their candidate mates. We found no evidence for kin discrimination: mate choice was random with respect to relatedness when all mate-choice events were considered, and, after correction for multiple tests, also in all breeding years. We suggest that dispersal is a sufficient inbreeding avoidance mechanism in most situations, although the lack of kin discriminative mate choice has negative consequences for some females, because they end up mating with closely related males that lowers their fitness. Copyright 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Bengt Hansson & Lucy Jack & Julian K. Christians & Josephine M. Pemberton & Mikael Åkesson & Helena Westerdahl & Staffan Bensch & Dennis Hasselquist, 2007. "No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a great reed warbler population," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 157-164, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:157-164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adeline Loyau & Jérémie H Cornuau & Jean Clobert & Étienne Danchin, 2012. "Incestuous Sisters: Mate Preference for Brothers over Unrelated Males in Drosophila melanogaster," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Jussi S. Alho & Céline Teplitsky & James A. Mills & John W. Yarrall & Juha Merilä, 2012. "No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through active mate choice in red-billed gulls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 672-675.
    3. Patricia Brekke & Jinliang Wang & Peter M. Bennett & Phillip Cassey & Deborah A. Dawson & Gavin J. Horsburgh & John G. Ewen, 2012. "Postcopulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in the island endemic hihi (Notiomystis cincta)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 278-284.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:157-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.