IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0049268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Return to Work after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Predictive Value of Self-Reported Health Compared to Clinical Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Biering
  • Torsten Toftegaard Nielsen
  • Kurt Rasmussen
  • Troels Niemann
  • Niels Henrik Hjollund

Abstract

Aims: Coronary heart disease is prevalent in the working-age population. Traditional outcome measures like mortality and readmission are of importance to evaluate the prognosis but are hardly sufficient. Ability to work is an additional outcome of clinical and societal significance. We describe trends and predictors of Return To Work (RTW) after PCI and describe a possible benefit using patient-reported measures in risk stratification of RTW. Methods: A total of 1585 patients aged less than 67 years treated with PCI in 2006–2008 at the Aarhus University Hospital were enrolled. Clinical information was provided through the West Denmark Heart Registry, and 4 weeks after PCI we mailed a questionnaire regarding self-rated health (response rate 83.5%). RTW was defined at weekly basis using extensive register data on transfer payments. Predictors of RTW were analysed as time to event. ROC curves constructed by logistic regression of predicting variables were evaluated by the c-statistic. Results: Four weeks before PCI 50% of the patients were working; the corresponding figures were 25% after 4 weeks, 36% after 12 weeks, and 43% after one year. The patients’ self-rated health one month after the procedure was a significant better predictor of RTW compared to other variables including LVEF, both at short (12 weeks) and long (one year) term. Conclusions: The patient's self-rated health four weeks after the procedure was a stronger predictor than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and consequently useful when patients seek medical advice with respect to RWT.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Biering & Torsten Toftegaard Nielsen & Kurt Rasmussen & Troels Niemann & Niels Henrik Hjollund, 2012. "Return to Work after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Predictive Value of Self-Reported Health Compared to Clinical Measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0049268
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049268
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049268&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0049268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John P. Klein & Per Kragh Andersen, 2005. "Regression Modeling of Competing Risks Data Based on Pseudovalues of the Cumulative Incidence Function," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 223-229, March.
    2. Söderman, Eva & Lisspers, Jan & Sundin, Örjan, 2003. "Depression as a predictor of return to work in patients with coronary artery disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 193-202, January.
    3. Fukuoka, Yoshimi & Dracup, Kathleen & Takeshima, Masako & Ishii, Noriko & Makaya, Miyuki & Groah, Linda & Kyriakidis, Erick, 2009. "Effect of job strain and depressive symptoms upon returning to work after acute coronary syndrome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 1875-1881, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriano Dias & João Marcos Bernardes & Sandro Augusto Servilha Coquemala & Juan Gómez-Salgado & Carlos Ruiz-Frutos, 2019. "Predictors of return to work with and without restrictions in public workers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Marco Franceschini & Maria Pia Massimiani & Stefano Paravati & Maurizio Agosti, 2016. "Return to Work: A Cut-Off of FIM Gain with Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score in Order to Identify Predictive Factors in Subjects with Acquired Brain Injury," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Mariarita Stendardo & Melissa Bonci & Valeria Casillo & Rossella Miglio & Giulia Giovannini & Marco Nardini & Gianluca Campo & Alessandro Fucili & Piera Boschetto, 2018. "Predicting return to work after acute myocardial infarction: Socio-occupational factors overcome clinical conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annalisa Orenti & Patrizia Boracchi & Giuseppe Marano & Elia Biganzoli & Federico Ambrogi, 2022. "A pseudo-values regression model for non-fatal event free survival in the presence of semi-competing risks," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(3), pages 709-727, September.
    2. Michael J. Martens & Brent R. Logan, 2018. "A group sequential test for treatment effect based on the Fine–Gray model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 1006-1013, September.
    3. Abasiama Etuknwa & Kevin Daniels & Rachel Nayani & Constanze Eib, 2023. "Sustainable Return to Work for Workers with Mental Health and Musculoskeletal Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Yosra Yousif & Faiz Elfaki & Meftah Hrairi & Oyelola Adegboye, 2022. "Bayesian Analysis of Masked Competing Risks Data Based on Proportional Subdistribution Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Erik T. Parner & Per K. Andersen & Morten Overgaard, 2020. "Cumulative risk regression in case–cohort studies using pseudo-observations," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 639-658, October.
    6. Su, Pei-Fang & Chi, Yunchan & Li, Chung-I & Shyr, Yu & Liao, Yi-De, 2011. "Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time for paired and clustered right-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1617-1628, April.
    7. Frank Eriksson & Thomas Scheike, 2015. "Additive gamma frailty models with applications to competing risks in related individuals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 677-686, September.
    8. Zijing Yang & Chengfeng Zhang & Yawen Hou & Zheng Chen, 2023. "Analysis of dynamic restricted mean survival time based on pseudo‐observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3690-3700, December.
    9. Deresa, Negera Wakgari & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2020. "A multivariate normal regression model for survival data subject to different types of dependent censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Sangbum Choi & Xuelin Huang, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation of semiparametric mixture component models for competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 588-598, September.
    11. Michael J. Martens & Brent R. Logan, 2020. "Group sequential tests for treatment effect on survival and cumulative incidence at a fixed time point," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 603-623, July.
    12. M. A. Nicolaie & J. C. van Houwelingen & T. M. de Witte & H. Putter, 2013. "Dynamic Pseudo-Observations: A Robust Approach to Dynamic Prediction in Competing Risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1043-1052, December.
    13. Yuxue Jin & Tze Leung Lai, 2017. "A new approach to regression analysis of censored competing-risks data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 605-625, October.
    14. Joshi, Amol M. & Hemmatian, Iman, 2018. "How do legal surprises drive organizational attention and case resolution? An analysis of false patent marking lawsuits," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1741-1761.
    15. Jacobo de Uña‐Álvarez & Micha Mandel, 2018. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities for a general progressive multi‐state model under cross‐sectional sampling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1203-1212, December.
    16. Wycinka Ewa, 2019. "Competing Risk Models of Default in the Presence of Early Repayments," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 99-120, June.
    17. Alina Schenk & Moritz Berger & Matthias Schmid, 2024. "Pseudo-value regression trees," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 439-471, April.
    18. Bingqing Zhou & Aurelien Latouche & Vanderson Rocha & Jason Fine, 2011. "Competing Risks Regression for Stratified Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 661-670, June.
    19. Weizhe Sun & Leila Gholizadeh & Lin Perry & Kyoungrim Kang & Mehrdad Heydari, 2021. "Factors associated with return to work following myocardial infarction: A systematic review of observational studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 323-340, February.
    20. Lee, Unkyung & Sun, Yanqing & Scheike, Thomas H. & Gilbert, Peter B., 2018. "Analysis of generalized semiparametric regression models for cumulative incidence functions with missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 59-79.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0049268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.