IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0031437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Composite Structural Motifs of Binding Sites for Delineating Biological Functions of Proteins

Author

Listed:
  • Akira R Kinjo
  • Haruki Nakamura

Abstract

Most biological processes are described as a series of interactions between proteins and other molecules, and interactions are in turn described in terms of atomic structures. To annotate protein functions as sets of interaction states at atomic resolution, and thereby to better understand the relation between protein interactions and biological functions, we conducted exhaustive all-against-all atomic structure comparisons of all known binding sites for ligands including small molecules, proteins and nucleic acids, and identified recurring elementary motifs. By integrating the elementary motifs associated with each subunit, we defined composite motifs that represent context-dependent combinations of elementary motifs. It is demonstrated that function similarity can be better inferred from composite motif similarity compared to the similarity of protein sequences or of individual binding sites. By integrating the composite motifs associated with each protein function, we define meta-composite motifs each of which is regarded as a time-independent diagrammatic representation of a biological process. It is shown that meta-composite motifs provide richer annotations of biological processes than sequence clusters. The present results serve as a basis for bridging atomic structures to higher-order biological phenomena by classification and integration of binding site structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Akira R Kinjo & Haruki Nakamura, 2012. "Composite Structural Motifs of Binding Sites for Delineating Biological Functions of Proteins," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0031437
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031437
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031437&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0031437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nan Zhao & Bin Pang & Chi-Ren Shyu & Dmitry Korkin, 2011. "Structural Similarity and Classification of Protein Interaction Interfaces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Brenton Louie & Roger Higdon & Eugene Kolker, 2009. "A Statistical Model of Protein Sequence Similarity and Function Similarity Reveals Overly-Specific Function Predictions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Carol V. Robinson & Andrej Sali & Wolfgang Baumeister, 2007. "The molecular sociology of the cell," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7172), pages 973-982, December.
    4. Oliver C Redfern & Benoît H Dessailly & Timothy J Dallman & Ian Sillitoe & Christine A Orengo, 2009. "FLORA: A Novel Method to Predict Protein Function from Structure in Diverse Superfamilies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Alexandra M Schnoes & Shoshana D Brown & Igor Dodevski & Patricia C Babbitt, 2009. "Annotation Error in Public Databases: Misannotation of Molecular Function in Enzyme Superfamilies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haijia Shi & Lei Shi, 2014. "Identifying Emerging Motif in Growing Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Fa & Domenico Cozzetto & Cen Wan & David T Jones, 2018. "Predicting human protein function with multi-task deep neural networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Michal Brylinski & Daswanth Lingam, 2012. "eThread: A Highly Optimized Machine Learning-Based Approach to Meta-Threading and the Modeling of Protein Tertiary Structures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Thomas J Sharpton & Samantha J Riesenfeld & Steven W Kembel & Joshua Ladau & James P O'Dwyer & Jessica L Green & Jonathan A Eisen & Katherine S Pollard, 2011. "PhylOTU: A High-Throughput Procedure Quantifies Microbial Community Diversity and Resolves Novel Taxa from Metagenomic Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Lucien F. Krapp & Luciano A. Abriata & Fabio Cortés Rodriguez & Matteo Dal Peraro, 2023. "PeSTo: parameter-free geometric deep learning for accurate prediction of protein binding interfaces," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Elisa Boari de Lima & Wagner Meira Júnior & Raquel Cardoso de Melo-Minardi, 2016. "Isofunctional Protein Subfamily Detection Using Data Integration and Spectral Clustering," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    6. Matthew N Benedict & Michael B Mundy & Christopher S Henry & Nicholas Chia & Nathan D Price, 2014. "Likelihood-Based Gene Annotations for Gap Filling and Quality Assessment in Genome-Scale Metabolic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Wing-Cheong Wong & Sebastian Maurer-Stroh & Frank Eisenhaber, 2010. "More Than 1,001 Problems with Protein Domain Databases: Transmembrane Regions, Signal Peptides and the Issue of Sequence Homology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Chioko Nagao & Nozomi Nagano & Kenji Mizuguchi, 2014. "Prediction of Detailed Enzyme Functions and Identification of Specificity Determining Residues by Random Forests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Yuval Bussi & Ruti Kapon & Ziv Reich, 2021. "Large-scale k-mer-based analysis of the informational properties of genomes, comparative genomics and taxonomy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0031437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.