IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0022743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness of Self-Organised Systems to Changes in Behaviour: An Example from Real and Simulated Self-Organised Snail Aggregations

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Stafford
  • Gray A Williams
  • Mark S Davies

Abstract

Group or population level self-organised systems comprise many individuals displaying group-level emergent properties. Current theory indicates that individual-level behaviours have an effect on the final group-level behaviour; that is, self-organised systems are sensitive to small changes in individual behaviour. Here we examine a self-organised behaviour in relation to environmentally-driven individual-level changes in behaviour, using both natural systems and computer simulations. We demonstrate that aggregations of intertidal snails slightly decrease in size when, owing to hotter and more desiccating conditions, individuals forage for shorter periods – a seemingly non-adaptive behaviour for the snails since aggregation reduces desiccation stress. This decrease, however, only occurs in simple experimental systems (and simulations of these systems). When studied in their natural and more complex environment, and simulations of such an environment, using the same reduced foraging time, no difference in aggregation behaviour was found between hot and cool days. These results give an indication of how robust self-organised systems are to changes in individual-level behaviour. The complexity of the natural environment and the interactions of individuals with this environment, therefore, can result in self-organised systems being more resilient to individual-level changes than previously assumed.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Stafford & Gray A Williams & Mark S Davies, 2011. "Robustness of Self-Organised Systems to Changes in Behaviour: An Example from Real and Simulated Self-Organised Snail Aggregations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-7, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0022743
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022743
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022743&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0022743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Audrey Dussutour & Vincent Fourcassié & Dirk Helbing & Jean-Louis Deneubourg, 2004. "Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6978), pages 70-73, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Strömbom & Audrey Dussutour, 2018. "Self-organized traffic via priority rules in leaf-cutting ants," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Jinxiao Duan & Guanwen Zeng & Nimrod Serok & Daqing Li & Efrat Blumenfeld Lieberthal & Hai-Jun Huang & Shlomo Havlin, 2023. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of traffic bottlenecks yields an early signal of heavy congestions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Sarvi, Majid, 2013. "Understanding pedestrian crowd panic: a review on model organisms approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 12-17.
    4. Armbruster, D. & de Beer, C. & Freitag, M. & Jagalski, T. & Ringhofer, C., 2006. "Autonomous control of production networks using a pheromone approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 363(1), pages 104-114.
    5. Simon Garnier & Tucker Murphy & Matthew Lutz & Edward Hurme & Simon Leblanc & Iain D Couzin, 2013. "Stability and Responsiveness in a Self-Organized Living Architecture," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.
    6. Viana, Matheus P. & Fourcassié, Vincent & Perna, Andrea & Costa, Luciano da F. & Jost, Christian, 2013. "Accessibility in networks: A useful measure for understanding social insect nest architecture," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 38-45.
    7. Mark W. Moffett & Simon Garnier & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Nathan R. Furr & Massimo Warglien & Costanza Sartoris & William Ocasio & Thorbjørn Knudsen & Lars A. Bach & Joachim Offenberg, 2021. "Ant colonies: building complex organizations with minuscule brains and no leaders," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(1), pages 55-74, March.
    8. Sakiyama, Tomoko & Gunji, Yukio-Pegio, 2016. "Directional ambiguity in trail-laying algorithms," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 37-44.
    9. Christoph Grüter & Roger Schürch & Tomer J Czaczkes & Keeley Taylor & Thomas Durance & Sam M Jones & Francis L W Ratnieks, 2012. "Negative Feedback Enables Fast and Flexible Collective Decision-Making in Ants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Haghani, Milad, 2021. "The knowledge domain of crowd dynamics: Anatomy of the field, pioneering studies, temporal trends, influential entities and outside-domain impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    11. Michele C Lanan & Anna Dornhaus & Emily I Jones & Andrew Waser & Judith L Bronstein, 2012. "The Trail Less Traveled: Individual Decision-Making and Its Effect on Group Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Andrea Perna & Boris Granovskiy & Simon Garnier & Stamatios C Nicolis & Marjorie Labédan & Guy Theraulaz & Vincent Fourcassié & David J T Sumpter, 2012. "Individual Rules for Trail Pattern Formation in Argentine Ants (Linepithema humile)," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    13. Arjun Chandrasekhar & James A R Marshall & Cortnea Austin & Saket Navlakha & Deborah M Gordon, 2021. "Better tired than lost: Turtle ant trail networks favor coherence over short edges," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Sebastian Weitz & Stéphane Blanco & Richard Fournier & Jacques Gautrais & Christian Jost & Guy Theraulaz, 2012. "Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Natalia Zabzina & Audrey Dussutour & Richard P Mann & David J T Sumpter & Stamatios C Nicolis, 2014. "Symmetry Restoring Bifurcation in Collective Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Seitz, Michael J. & Dietrich, Felix & Köster, Gerta, 2015. "The effect of stepping on pedestrian trajectories," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 594-604.
    17. Wang, Shujie & Cao, Shuchao & Wang, Qiao & Lian, Liping & Song, Weiguo, 2016. "Effect of exit locations on ants escaping a two-exit room stressed with repellent," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 457(C), pages 239-254.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0022743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.