IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1009028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning divisive normalization in primary visual cortex

Author

Listed:
  • Max F Burg
  • Santiago A Cadena
  • George H Denfield
  • Edgar Y Walker
  • Andreas S Tolias
  • Matthias Bethge
  • Alexander S Ecker

Abstract

Divisive normalization (DN) is a prominent computational building block in the brain that has been proposed as a canonical cortical operation. Numerous experimental studies have verified its importance for capturing nonlinear neural response properties to simple, artificial stimuli, and computational studies suggest that DN is also an important component for processing natural stimuli. However, we lack quantitative models of DN that are directly informed by measurements of spiking responses in the brain and applicable to arbitrary stimuli. Here, we propose a DN model that is applicable to arbitrary input images. We test its ability to predict how neurons in macaque primary visual cortex (V1) respond to natural images, with a focus on nonlinear response properties within the classical receptive field. Our model consists of one layer of subunits followed by learned orientation-specific DN. It outperforms linear-nonlinear and wavelet-based feature representations and makes a significant step towards the performance of state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) models. Unlike deep CNNs, our compact DN model offers a direct interpretation of the nature of normalization. By inspecting the learned normalization pool of our model, we gained insights into a long-standing question about the tuning properties of DN that update the current textbook description: we found that within the receptive field oriented features were normalized preferentially by features with similar orientation rather than non-specifically as currently assumed.Author summary: Divisive normalization (DN) is a computational building block throughout sensory processing in the brain. We currently lack an understanding of what role this normalization mechanism plays when processing complex stimuli like natural images. Here, we use modern machine learning methods to build a general DN model that is directly informed by data from primary visual cortex (V1). Contrary to high-predictive deep learning models, our DN-based model’s parameters offer a straightforward interpretation of the nature of normalization. Within the receptive field, we found that neurons responding strongly to a specific orientation are preferentially normalized by other neurons that are highly active for similar orientations, rather than being normalized by all neurons as it is currently assumed by textbook models.

Suggested Citation

  • Max F Burg & Santiago A Cadena & George H Denfield & Edgar Y Walker & Andreas S Tolias & Matthias Bethge & Alexander S Ecker, 2021. "Learning divisive normalization in primary visual cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-31, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009028
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009028&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Selmaan N. Chettih & Christopher D. Harvey, 2019. "Single-neuron perturbations reveal feature-specific competition in V1," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7748), pages 334-340, March.
    2. George H. Denfield & Alexander S. Ecker & Tori J. Shinn & Matthias Bethge & Andreas S. Tolias, 2018. "Attentional fluctuations induce shared variability in macaque primary visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. James M McFarland & Yuwei Cui & Daniel A Butts, 2013. "Inferring Nonlinear Neuronal Computation Based on Physiologically Plausible Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bettina Voelcker & Ravi Pancholi & Simon Peron, 2022. "Transformation of primary sensory cortical representations from layer 4 to layer 2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Giulia Faini & Dimitrii Tanese & Clément Molinier & Cécile Telliez & Massilia Hamdani & Francois Blot & Christophe Tourain & Vincent Sars & Filippo Bene & Benoît C. Forget & Emiliano Ronzitti & Valent, 2023. "Ultrafast light targeting for high-throughput precise control of neuronal networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Johannes Burge & Priyank Jaini, 2017. "Accuracy Maximization Analysis for Sensory-Perceptual Tasks: Computational Improvements, Filter Robustness, and Coding Advantages for Scaled Additive Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Ivar L Thorson & Jean Liénard & Stephen V David, 2015. "The Essential Complexity of Auditory Receptive Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, December.
    5. Lucas Theis & Andrè Maia Chagas & Daniel Arnstein & Cornelius Schwarz & Matthias Bethge, 2013. "Beyond GLMs: A Generative Mixture Modeling Approach to Neural System Identification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    6. Ross S Williamson & Maneesh Sahani & Jonathan W Pillow, 2015. "The Equivalence of Information-Theoretic and Likelihood-Based Methods for Neural Dimensionality Reduction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Niru Maheswaranathan & David B Kastner & Stephen A Baccus & Surya Ganguli, 2018. "Inferring hidden structure in multilayered neural circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, August.
    8. Julian Rossbroich & Daniel Trotter & John Beninger & Katalin Tóth & Richard Naud, 2021. "Linear-nonlinear cascades capture synaptic dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, March.
    9. Qianli Yang & Edgar Walker & R. James Cotton & Andreas S. Tolias & Xaq Pitkow, 2021. "Revealing nonlinear neural decoding by analyzing choices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Lloyd E. Russell & Mehmet Fişek & Zidan Yang & Lynn Pei Tan & Adam M. Packer & Henry W. P. Dalgleish & Selmaan N. Chettih & Christopher D. Harvey & Michael Häusser, 2024. "The influence of cortical activity on perception depends on behavioral state and sensory context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Jian K Liu & Tim Gollisch, 2015. "Spike-Triggered Covariance Analysis Reveals Phenomenological Diversity of Contrast Adaptation in the Retina," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, July.
    12. Maxim Volgushev & Vladimir Ilin & Ian H Stevenson, 2015. "Identifying and Tracking Simulated Synaptic Inputs from Neuronal Firing: Insights from In Vitro Experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-31, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.