IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneous responses to low level death receptor activation are explained by random molecular assembly of the Caspase-8 activation platform

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Matveeva
  • Michael Fichtner
  • Katherine McAllister
  • Christopher McCann
  • Marc Sturrock
  • Daniel B Longley
  • Jochen H M Prehn

Abstract

Ligand binding to death receptors activates apoptosis in cancer cells. Stimulation of death receptors results in the formation of intracellular multiprotein platforms that either activate the apoptotic initiator Caspase-8 to trigger cell death, or signal through kinases to initiate inflammatory and cell survival signalling. Two of these platforms, the Death-Inducing Signalling Complex (DISC) and the RIPoptosome, also initiate necroptosis by building filamentous scaffolds that lead to the activation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase. To explain cell decision making downstream of death receptor activation, we developed a semi-stochastic model of DISC/RIPoptosome formation. The model is a hybrid of a direct Gillespie stochastic simulation algorithm for slow assembly of the RIPoptosome and a deterministic model of downstream caspase activation. The model explains how alterations in the level of death receptor-ligand complexes, their clustering properties and intrinsic molecular fluctuations in RIPoptosome assembly drive heterogeneous dynamics of Caspase-8 activation. The model highlights how kinetic proofreading leads to heterogeneous cell responses and results in fractional cell killing at low levels of receptor stimulation. It reveals that the noise in Caspase-8 activation—exclusively caused by the stochastic molecular assembly of the DISC/RIPoptosome platform—has a key function in extrinsic apoptotic stimuli recognition.Author summary: Death receptors are targets of novel cancer therapeutics. Most of them signal through flexible multiprotein platforms to either activate apoptotic or necroptotic cell death, or propagate cell survival and pro-inflammatory signals. We focused our study on the role of dynamic assembly and composition of these platforms in the initiation of cell death at the single cell level. Since the assembly is slow through the competitive nature of protein binding within the platforms core we developed a stochastic mathematical model of the death inducing signalling platform. Our model provided an explanation for delayed cell death and fractional killing upon the death receptor stimulation. Additionally, we found that the variability in the cell death response arises through the random assembly initiates a slow noise-prone ramp activation of initiator Caspase-8 spontaneously triggering the apoptotic cascade. Our computational simulations predicted high variation in the time required for cell death induction at the single cell level and highlighted a significant role of death receptor clustering in effective Caspase-8 activation. Our knowledge and data driven model captures detailed processes governing the early events of cell death initiation and can be used to guide the development of more rational combinational treatments against cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Matveeva & Michael Fichtner & Katherine McAllister & Christopher McCann & Marc Sturrock & Daniel B Longley & Jochen H M Prehn, 2019. "Heterogeneous responses to low level death receptor activation are explained by random molecular assembly of the Caspase-8 activation platform," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007374
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007374&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabrina L. Spencer & Suzanne Gaudet & John G. Albeck & John M. Burke & Peter K. Sorger, 2009. "Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7245), pages 428-432, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazunari Iwamoto & Yuki Shindo & Koichi Takahashi, 2016. "Modeling Cellular Noise Underlying Heterogeneous Cell Responses in the Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling Pathway," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Lucy Ham & Megan A. Coomer & Kaan Öcal & Ramon Grima & Michael P. H. Stumpf, 2024. "A stochastic vs deterministic perspective on the timing of cellular events," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Artémis Llamosi & Andres M Gonzalez-Vargas & Cristian Versari & Eugenio Cinquemani & Giancarlo Ferrari-Trecate & Pascal Hersen & Gregory Batt, 2016. "What Population Reveals about Individual Cell Identity: Single-Cell Parameter Estimation of Models of Gene Expression in Yeast," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Jan Hasenauer & Christine Hasenauer & Tim Hucho & Fabian J Theis, 2014. "ODE Constrained Mixture Modelling: A Method for Unraveling Subpopulation Structures and Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Mahdi Golkaram & Stefan Hellander & Brian Drawert & Linda R Petzold, 2016. "Macromolecular Crowding Regulates the Gene Expression Profile by Limiting Diffusion," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Andreas Doncic & Umut Eser & Oguzhan Atay & Jan M Skotheim, 2013. "An Algorithm to Automate Yeast Segmentation and Tracking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Orsolya Symmons & Marcello Chang & Ian A Mellis & Jennifer M Kalish & Jihwan Park & Katalin Suszták & Marisa S Bartolomei & Arjun Raj, 2019. "Allele-specific RNA imaging shows that allelic imbalances can arise in tissues through transcriptional bursting," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Szymon Stoma & Alexandre Donzé & François Bertaux & Oded Maler & Gregory Batt, 2013. "STL-based Analysis of TRAIL-induced Apoptosis Challenges the Notion of Type I/Type II Cell Line Classification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Paul Michael Loriaux & Glenn Tesler & Alexander Hoffmann, 2013. "Characterizing the Relationship between Steady State and Response Using Analytical Expressions for the Steady States of Mass Action Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Dirke Imig & Nadine Pollak & Frank Allgöwer & Markus Rehm, 2020. "Sample-based modeling reveals bidirectional interplay between cell cycle progression and extrinsic apoptosis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Tae J Lee & Guang Yao & Dorothy C Bennett & Joseph R Nevins & Lingchong You, 2010. "Stochastic E2F Activation and Reconciliation of Phenomenological Cell-Cycle Models," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-11, September.
    12. Christopher C Govern & Arup K Chakraborty, 2013. "Stochastic Responses May Allow Genetically Diverse Cell Populations to Optimize Performance with Simpler Signaling Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    13. Chad Liu & Chuan-Yuan Li & Fan Yuan, 2014. "Mathematical Modeling of the Phoenix Rising Pathway," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-10, February.
    14. Miles Miller & Marc Hafner & Eduardo Sontag & Noah Davidsohn & Sairam Subramanian & Priscilla E M Purnick & Douglas Lauffenburger & Ron Weiss, 2012. "Modular Design of Artificial Tissue Homeostasis: Robust Control through Synthetic Cellular Heterogeneity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Subhadip Raychaudhuri, 2010. "A Minimal Model of Signaling Network Elucidates Cell-to-Cell Stochastic Variability in Apoptosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-7, August.
    16. Leighton T Izu & Tamás Bányász & Ye Chen-Izu, 2015. "Optimizing Population Variability to Maximize Benefit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Suzanne Gaudet & Sabrina L Spencer & William W Chen & Peter K Sorger, 2012. "Exploring the Contextual Sensitivity of Factors that Determine Cell-to-Cell Variability in Receptor-Mediated Apoptosis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Andreas Raue & Marcel Schilling & Julie Bachmann & Andrew Matteson & Max Schelke & Daniel Kaschek & Sabine Hug & Clemens Kreutz & Brian D Harms & Fabian J Theis & Ursula Klingmüller & Jens Timmer, 2013. "Lessons Learned from Quantitative Dynamical Modeling in Systems Biology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.