IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parameter estimation and identifiability in a neural population model for electro-cortical activity

Author

Listed:
  • Agus Hartoyo
  • Peter J Cadusch
  • David T J Liley
  • Damien G Hicks

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a non-invasive measure of brain electrical activity. Neural population models, where large numbers of interacting neurons are considered collectively as a macroscopic system, have long been used to understand features in EEG signals. By tuning dozens of input parameters describing the excitatory and inhibitory neuron populations, these models can reproduce prominent features of the EEG such as the alpha-rhythm. However, the inverse problem, of directly estimating the parameters from fits to EEG data, remains unsolved. Solving this multi-parameter non-linear fitting problem will potentially provide a real-time method for characterizing average neuronal properties in human subjects. Here we perform unbiased fits of a 22-parameter neural population model to EEG data from 82 individuals, using both particle swarm optimization and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. We estimate how much is learned about individual parameters by computing Kullback-Leibler divergences between posterior and prior distributions for each parameter. Results indicate that only a single parameter, that determining the dynamics of inhibitory synaptic activity, is directly identifiable, while other parameters have large, though correlated, uncertainties. We show that the eigenvalues of the Fisher information matrix are roughly uniformly spaced over a log scale, indicating that the model is sloppy, like many of the regulatory network models in systems biology. These eigenvalues indicate that the system can be modeled with a low effective dimensionality, with inhibitory synaptic activity being prominent in driving system behavior.Author summary: Electroencephalography (EEG), where electrodes are used to measure electric potential on the outside of the scalp, provides a simple, non-invasive way to study brain activity. Physiological interpretation of features in EEG signals has often involved use of collective models of neural populations. These neural population models have dozens of input parameters to describe the properties of inhibitory and excitatory neurons. Being able to estimate these parameters by direct fits to EEG data holds the promise of providing a real-time non-invasive method of inferring neuronal properties in different individuals. However, it has long been impossible to fit these nonlinear, multi-parameter models effectively. Here we describe fits of a 22-parameter neural population model to EEG spectra from 82 different subjects, all exhibiting alpha-oscillations. We show how only one parameter, that describing inhibitory dynamics, is constrained by the data, although all parameters are correlated. These results indicate that inhibitory synaptic activity plays a central role in the generation and modulation of the alpha-rhythm in humans.

Suggested Citation

  • Agus Hartoyo & Peter J Cadusch & David T J Liley & Damien G Hicks, 2019. "Parameter estimation and identifiability in a neural population model for electro-cortical activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006694
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006694
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006694&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Keitel & Joachim Gross, 2016. "Individual Human Brain Areas Can Be Identified from Their Characteristic Spectral Activation Fingerprints," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Alejandro F Villaverde & Antonio Barreiro & Antonis Papachristodoulou, 2016. "Structural Identifiability of Dynamic Systems Biology Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Ryan N Gutenkunst & Joshua J Waterfall & Fergal P Casey & Kevin S Brown & Christopher R Myers & James P Sethna, 2007. "Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-8, October.
    4. Gabriele Lillacci & Mustafa Khammash, 2010. "Parameter Estimation and Model Selection in Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Anca Doloc-Mihu & Ronald L Calabrese, 2014. "Identifying Crucial Parameter Correlations Maintaining Bursting Activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Mark K Transtrum & Peng Qiu, 2016. "Bridging Mechanistic and Phenomenological Models of Complex Biological Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-34, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseph D Taylor & Samuel Winnall & Alain Nogaret, 2020. "Estimation of neuron parameters from imperfect observations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew White & Malachi Tolman & Howard D Thames & Hubert Rodney Withers & Kathy A Mason & Mark K Transtrum, 2016. "The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Joseph D Taylor & Samuel Winnall & Alain Nogaret, 2020. "Estimation of neuron parameters from imperfect observations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Alireza Yazdani & Lu Lu & Maziar Raissi & George Em Karniadakis, 2020. "Systems biology informed deep learning for inferring parameters and hidden dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Alejandro F. Villaverde, 2019. "Observability and Structural Identifiability of Nonlinear Biological Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, January.
    5. Hongwei Shao & Tao Peng & Zhiwei Ji & Jing Su & Xiaobo Zhou, 2013. "Systematically Studying Kinase Inhibitor Induced Signaling Network Signatures by Integrating Both Therapeutic and Side Effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Gabriele Lillacci & Mustafa Khammash, 2010. "Parameter Estimation and Model Selection in Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Elba Raimúndez & Simone Keller & Gwen Zwingenberger & Karolin Ebert & Sabine Hug & Fabian J Theis & Dieter Maier & Birgit Luber & Jan Hasenauer, 2020. "Model-based analysis of response and resistance factors of cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Nerea Martínez & Alejandro F. Villaverde, 2020. "Nonlinear Observability Algorithms with Known and Unknown Inputs: Analysis and Implementation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Xinxian Shao & Andrew Mugler & Justin Kim & Ha Jun Jeong & Bruce R Levin & Ilya Nemenman, 2017. "Growth of bacteria in 3-d colonies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Fuaada Mohd Siam & Muhamad Hanis Nasir, 2019. "Comparison of parameter fitting on the model of irradiation effects on bystander cells between Nelder-Mead simplex and particle swarm optimization," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 5(3), pages 142-150.
    11. Takanori Hasegawa & Rui Yamaguchi & Masao Nagasaki & Satoru Miyano & Seiya Imoto, 2014. "Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks Incorporating Multi-Source Biological Knowledge via a State Space Model with L1 Regularization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Christian A Tiemann & Joep Vanlier & Maaike H Oosterveer & Albert K Groen & Peter A J Hilbers & Natal A W van Riel, 2013. "Parameter Trajectory Analysis to Identify Treatment Effects of Pharmacological Interventions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Se Ho Park & Seokmin Ha & Jae Kyoung Kim, 2023. "A general model-based causal inference method overcomes the curse of synchrony and indirect effect," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Zachary R Fox & Brian Munsky, 2019. "The finite state projection based Fisher information matrix approach to estimate information and optimize single-cell experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Yuncong Geng & Thu Vu Phuc Nguyen & Ehsan Homaee & Ido Golding, 2024. "Using bacterial population dynamics to count phages and their lysogens," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Claudia Schillings & Mikael Sunnåker & Jörg Stelling & Christoph Schwab, 2015. "Efficient Characterization of Parametric Uncertainty of Complex (Bio)chemical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Giorgos Minas & David A Rand, 2017. "Long-time analytic approximation of large stochastic oscillators: Simulation, analysis and inference," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Marc Hafner & Heinz Koeppl & Martin Hasler & Andreas Wagner, 2009. "‘Glocal’ Robustness Analysis and Model Discrimination for Circadian Oscillators," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-10, October.
    19. Joshua Russell-Buckland & Christopher P Barnes & Ilias Tachtsidis, 2019. "A Bayesian framework for the analysis of systems biology models of the brain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, April.
    20. Borut Kirn, 2019. "Visualization of Myocardial Strain Pattern Uniqueness with Respect to Activation Time and Contractility: A Computational Study," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-7, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.