IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian phylodynamic inference with complex models

Author

Listed:
  • Erik M Volz
  • Igor Siveroni

Abstract

Population genetic modeling can enhance Bayesian phylogenetic inference by providing a realistic prior on the distribution of branch lengths and times of common ancestry. The parameters of a population genetic model may also have intrinsic importance, and simultaneous estimation of a phylogeny and model parameters has enabled phylodynamic inference of population growth rates, reproduction numbers, and effective population size through time. Phylodynamic inference based on pathogen genetic sequence data has emerged as useful supplement to epidemic surveillance, however commonly-used mechanistic models that are typically fitted to non-genetic surveillance data are rarely fitted to pathogen genetic data due to a dearth of software tools, and the theory required to conduct such inference has been developed only recently. We present a framework for coalescent-based phylogenetic and phylodynamic inference which enables highly-flexible modeling of demographic and epidemiological processes. This approach builds upon previous structured coalescent approaches and includes enhancements for computational speed, accuracy, and stability. A flexible markup language is described for translating parametric demographic or epidemiological models into a structured coalescent model enabling simultaneous estimation of demographic or epidemiological parameters and time-scaled phylogenies. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches by fitting compartmental epidemiological models to Ebola virus and Influenza A virus sequence data, demonstrating how important features of these epidemics, such as the reproduction number and epidemic curves, can be gleaned from genetic data. These approaches are provided as an open-source package PhyDyn for the BEAST2 phylogenetics platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik M Volz & Igor Siveroni, 2018. "Bayesian phylodynamic inference with complex models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006546
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006546
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006546&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006546?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicola De Maio & Chieh-Hsi Wu & Kathleen M O’Reilly & Daniel Wilson, 2015. "New Routes to Phylogeography: A Bayesian Structured Coalescent Approximation," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Julia A. Palacios & Vladimir N. Minin, 2013. "Gaussian Process-Based Bayesian Nonparametric Inference of Population Size Trajectories from Gene Genealogies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 8-18, March.
    3. Luís M A Bettencourt & Ruy M Ribeiro, 2008. "Real Time Bayesian Estimation of the Epidemic Potential of Emerging Infectious Diseases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Zimmer & Reza Yaesoubi & Ted Cohen, 2017. "A Likelihood Approach for Real-Time Calibration of Stochastic Compartmental Epidemic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. De Simone, Andrea & Piangerelli, Marco, 2020. "A Bayesian approach for monitoring epidemics in presence of undetected cases," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Kris V. Parag & Robin N. Thompson & Christl A. Donnelly, 2022. "Are epidemic growth rates more informative than reproduction numbers?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(S1), pages 5-15, November.
    4. Fajar, Muhammad, 2020. "Estimasi angka reproduksi Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), Kasus Indonesia (Estimation of COVID-19 reproductive number, case of Indonesia [Estimation Of Covid-19 Reproductive Number (Case Of Indonesia," MPRA Paper 105099, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Mar 2020.
    5. Chad Cotti & Bryan Engelhardt & Joshua Foster & Erik Nesson & Paul Niekamp, 2021. "The relationship between in‐person voting and COVID‐19: Evidence from the Wisconsin primary," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(4), pages 760-777, October.
    6. Imelda Trejo & Nicolas W Hengartner, 2022. "A modified Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model for observed under-reported incidence data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Victor W. Chu & Raymond K. Wong & Chi-Hung Chi & Wei Zhou & Ivan Ho, 2017. "The design of a cloud-based tracker platform based on system-of-systems service architecture," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1283-1299, December.
    8. Lorenzo Cappello & Swarnadip Ghosh & Julia A. Palacios, 2020. "Discussion on “Horseshoe‐based Bayesian nonparametric estimation of effective population size trajectories” by James R. Faulkner, Andrew F. Magee, Beth Shapiro, and Vladimir N. Minin," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 691-694, September.
    9. Kernel Prieto & M Victoria Chávez–Hernández & Jhoana P Romero–Leiton, 2022. "On mobility trends analysis of COVID–19 dissemination in Mexico City," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Yankuo Sun & Jiabao Xing & Samuel L. Hong & Nena Bollen & Sijia Xu & Yue Li & Jianhao Zhong & Xiaopeng Gao & Dihua Zhu & Jing Liu & Lang Gong & Lei Zhou & Tongqing An & Mang Shi & Heng Wang & Guy Bael, 2024. "Untangling lineage introductions, persistence and transmission drivers of HP-PRRSV sublineage 8.7," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Schimit, P.H.T. & Monteiro, L.H.A., 2012. "On estimating the basic reproduction number in distinct stages of a contagious disease spreading," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 156-160.
    12. Nicola De Maio & Chieh-Hsi Wu & Daniel J Wilson, 2016. "SCOTTI: Efficient Reconstruction of Transmission within Outbreaks with the Structured Coalescent," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Anup Malani & Satej Soman & Sam Asher & Paul Novosad & Clement Imbert & Vaidehi Tandel & Anish Agarwal & Abdullah Alomar & Arnab Sarker & Devavrat Shah & Dennis Shen & Jonathan Gruber & Stuti Sachdeva, 2020. "Adaptive Control of COVID-19 Outbreaks in India: Local, Gradual, and Trigger-based Exit Paths from Lockdown," NBER Working Papers 27532, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Ida Johnsson & M. Hashem Pesaran & Cynthia Fan Yang, 2023. "Structural Econometric Estimation of the Basic Reproduction Number for Covid-19 across U.S. States and Selected Countries," CESifo Working Paper Series 10659, CESifo.
    15. Flávio Codeço Coelho & Cláudia Torres Codeço & M Gabriela M Gomes, 2011. "A Bayesian Framework for Parameter Estimation in Dynamical Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-6, May.
    16. Guindon, Stéphane & Guo, Hongbin & Welch, David, 2016. "Demographic inference under the coalescent in a spatial continuum," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 43-50.
    17. Kernel Prieto, 2022. "Current forecast of COVID-19 in Mexico: A Bayesian and machine learning approaches," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Adam Brzezinski & David Van Dijcke & Valentin Kecht, 2020. "The Cost of Staying Open: Voluntary Social Distancing and Lockdowns in the US," Economics Series Working Papers 910, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    19. Bo Huang & Zhihui Huang & Chen Chen & Jian Lin & Tony Tam & Yingyi Hong & Sen Pei, 2022. "Social vulnerability amplifies the disparate impact of mobility on COVID-19 transmissibility across the United States," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Sean Elliott & Christian Gourieroux, 2020. "Uncertainty on the Reproduction Ratio in the SIR Model," Papers 2012.11542, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.