IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gain control with A-type potassium current: IA as a switch between divisive and subtractive inhibition

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua H Goldwyn
  • Bradley R Slabe
  • Joseph B Travers
  • David Terman

Abstract

Neurons process and convey information by transforming barrages of synaptic inputs into spiking activity. Synaptic inhibition typically suppresses the output firing activity of a neuron, and is commonly classified as having a subtractive or divisive effect on a neuron’s output firing activity. Subtractive inhibition can narrow the range of inputs that evoke spiking activity by eliminating responses to non-preferred inputs. Divisive inhibition is a form of gain control: it modifies firing rates while preserving the range of inputs that evoke firing activity. Since these two “modes” of inhibition have distinct impacts on neural coding, it is important to understand the biophysical mechanisms that distinguish these response profiles. In this study, we use simulations and mathematical analysis of a neuron model to find the specific conditions (parameter sets) for which inhibitory inputs have subtractive or divisive effects. Significantly, we identify a novel role for the A-type Potassium current (IA). In our model, this fast-activating, slowly-inactivating outward current acts as a switch between subtractive and divisive inhibition. In particular, if IA is strong (large maximal conductance) and fast (activates on a time-scale similar to spike initiation), then inhibition has a subtractive effect on neural firing. In contrast, if IA is weak or insufficiently fast-activating, then inhibition has a divisive effect on neural firing. We explain these findings using dynamical systems methods (plane analysis and fast-slow dissection) to define how a spike threshold condition depends on synaptic inputs and IA. Our findings suggest that neurons can “self-regulate” the gain control effects of inhibition via combinations of synaptic plasticity and/or modulation of the conductance and kinetics of A-type Potassium channels. This novel role for IA would add flexibility to neurons and networks, and may relate to recent observations of divisive inhibitory effects on neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract.Author summary: Neurons process information by generating spikes in response to two types of synaptic inputs. Excitatory inputs increase spike rates and inhibitory inputs decrease spike rates (typically). The interaction between these two input types and the transformation of these inputs into spike outputs is not, however, a simple matter of addition and subtraction. Inhibitory inputs can suppress outputs in a variety of ways. For instance, in some cases, inhibition adjusts the rate of spiking activity while preserving the range of inputs that evoke spiking activity; an important computational principle known as gain control. We use simulations and mathematical analysis of a neuron model to identify properties of a neuron that determine how inhibitory inputs affect spiking activity. Specifically, we demonstrate how the gain control effects of inhibition depend on the A-type Potassium current. This novel role for the A-type Potassium current provides a way for neurons to flexibly regulate how they process synaptic inputs and transmit signals to other areas of the brain.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua H Goldwyn & Bradley R Slabe & Joseph B Travers & David Terman, 2018. "Gain control with A-type potassium current: IA as a switch between divisive and subtractive inhibition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006292
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006292
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006292&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathan R. Wilson & Caroline A. Runyan & Forea L. Wang & Mriganka Sur, 2012. "Division and subtraction by distinct cortical inhibitory networks in vivo," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7411), pages 343-348, August.
    2. Jason S. Rothman & Laurence Cathala & Volker Steuber & R. Angus Silver, 2009. "Synaptic depression enables neuronal gain control," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7232), pages 1015-1018, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sorinel A Oprisan & Xandre Clementsmith & Tamas Tompa & Antonieta Lavin, 2019. "Dopamine receptor antagonists effects on low-dimensional attractors of local field potentials in optogenetic mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-39, October.
    2. Corentin Massot & Adam D Schneider & Maurice J Chacron & Kathleen E Cullen, 2012. "The Vestibular System Implements a Linear–Nonlinear Transformation In Order to Encode Self-Motion," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Ruxandra Barzan & Beyza Bozkurt & Mohammadreza M. Nejad & Sandra T. Süß & Tatjana Surdin & Hanna Böke & Katharina Spoida & Zohre Azimi & Michelle Grömmke & Dennis Eickelbeck & Melanie D. Mark & Lennar, 2024. "Gain control of sensory input across polysynaptic circuitries in mouse visual cortex by a single G protein-coupled receptor type (5-HT2A)," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Alireza Saeedi & Kun Wang & Ghazaleh Nikpourian & Andreas Bartels & Nikos K. Logothetis & Nelson K. Totah & Masataka Watanabe, 2024. "Brightness illusions drive a neuronal response in the primary visual cortex under top-down modulation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Tristan G. Heintz & Antonio J. Hinojosa & Sina E. Dominiak & Leon Lagnado, 2022. "Opposite forms of adaptation in mouse visual cortex are controlled by distinct inhibitory microcircuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. A. Barri & M. T. Wiechert & M. Jazayeri & D. A. DiGregorio, 2022. "Synaptic basis of a sub-second representation of time in a neural circuit model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Robert Rosenbaum & Jonathan Rubin & Brent Doiron, 2012. "Short Term Synaptic Depression Imposes a Frequency Dependent Filter on Synaptic Information Transfer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Christopher F. Angeloni & Wiktor Młynarski & Eugenio Piasini & Aaron M. Williams & Katherine C. Wood & Linda Garami & Ann M. Hermundstad & Maria N. Geffen, 2023. "Dynamics of cortical contrast adaptation predict perception of signals in noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Amanda M. Perozzo & Jochen Schwenk & Aichurok Kamalova & Terunaga Nakagawa & Bernd Fakler & Derek Bowie, 2023. "GSG1L-containing AMPA receptor complexes are defined by their spatiotemporal expression, native interactome and allosteric sites," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Yue Liu & Xiao-Jing Wang, 2024. "Flexible gating between subspaces in a neural network model of internally guided task switching," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Landry, Peter & Webb, Ryan, 2021. "Pairwise normalization: A neuroeconomic theory of multi-attribute choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Bryce D. Grier & Samuel Parkins & Jarra Omar & Hey-Kyoung Lee, 2023. "Selective plasticity of fast and slow excitatory synapses on somatostatin interneurons in adult visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.