IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of temporal sampling resolution on parameter inference for biological transport models

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan U Harrison
  • Ruth E Baker

Abstract

Imaging data has become an essential tool to explore key biological questions at various scales, for example the motile behaviour of bacteria or the transport of mRNA, and it has the potential to transform our understanding of important transport mechanisms. Often these imaging studies require us to compare biological species or mutants, and to do this we need to quantitatively characterise their behaviour. Mathematical models offer a quantitative description of a system that enables us to perform this comparison, but to relate mechanistic mathematical models to imaging data, we need to estimate their parameters. In this work we study how collecting data at different temporal resolutions impacts our ability to infer parameters of biological transport models by performing exact inference for simple velocity jump process models in a Bayesian framework. The question of how best to choose the frequency with which data is collected is prominent in a host of studies because the majority of imaging technologies place constraints on the frequency with which images can be taken, and the discrete nature of observations can introduce errors into parameter estimates. In this work, we mitigate such errors by formulating the velocity jump process model within a hidden states framework. This allows us to obtain estimates of the reorientation rate and noise amplitude for noisy observations of a simple velocity jump process. We demonstrate the sensitivity of these estimates to temporal variations in the sampling resolution and extent of measurement noise. We use our methodology to provide experimental guidelines for researchers aiming to characterise motile behaviour that can be described by a velocity jump process. In particular, we consider how experimental constraints resulting in a trade-off between temporal sampling resolution and observation noise may affect parameter estimates. Finally, we demonstrate the robustness of our methodology to model misspecification, and then apply our inference framework to a dataset that was generated with the aim of understanding the localization of RNA-protein complexes.Author summary: We consider how the temporal resolution of imaging studies affects our ability to carry out accurate parameter estimation for a stochastic biological transport model. This model provides a mechanistic description of motile behaviour and is often used to interrogate transport processes, such as the motion of bacteria. Parameter inference is necessary to characterise different types of transport and to make predictions about biological behaviour under different conditions. Typically, observations of the transport process, at the level of individual trajectories, are made at discrete times. This can lead to errors in parameter estimation because we do not have complete trajectory information. We present a framework for Bayesian inference for these models of biological transport processes. Using this framework, we study the effects of collecting data more or less frequently, and with varying measurement noise, on what we can learn about the biological system via parameter estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan U Harrison & Ruth E Baker, 2018. "The impact of temporal sampling resolution on parameter inference for biological transport models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006235
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006235
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006235&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Fearnhead & Dennis Prangle, 2012. "Constructing summary statistics for approximate Bayesian computation: semi-automatic approximate Bayesian computation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 74(3), pages 419-474, June.
    2. Christophe Andrieu & Arnaud Doucet & Roman Holenstein, 2010. "Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 269-342, June.
    3. David A Rasmussen & Oliver Ratmann & Katia Koelle, 2011. "Inference for Nonlinear Epidemiological Models Using Genealogies and Time Series," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Viswanathan, G.M & Afanasyev, V & Buldyrev, Sergey V & Havlin, Shlomo & da Luz, M.G.E & Raposo, E.P & Stanley, H.Eugene, 2000. "Lévy flights in random searches," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 1-12.
    5. Gabriel Rosser & Alexander G Fletcher & David A Wilkinson & Jennifer A de Beyer & Christian A Yates & Judith P Armitage & Philip K Maini & Ruth E Baker, 2013. "Novel Methods for Analysing Bacterial Tracks Reveal Persistence in Rhodobacter sphaeroides," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Pitt, Michael K. & Silva, Ralph dos Santos & Giordani, Paolo & Kohn, Robert, 2012. "On some properties of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation methods based on the particle filter," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 134-151.
    7. Nicosia, Aurélien & Duchesne, Thierry & Rivest, Louis-Paul & Fortin, Daniel, 2017. "A general hidden state random walk model for animal movement," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 76-95.
    8. Alexey Miroshnikov & Erin M Conlon, 2014. "parallelMCMCcombine: An R Package for Bayesian Methods for Big Data and Analytics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douc, Randal & Olsson, Jimmy & Roueff, François, 2020. "Posterior consistency for partially observed Markov models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 733-759.
    2. McKinley, Trevelyan J. & Ross, Joshua V. & Deardon, Rob & Cook, Alex R., 2014. "Simulation-based Bayesian inference for epidemic models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 434-447.
    3. Lux, Thomas, 2020. "Bayesian estimation of agent-based models via adaptive particle Markov chain Monte Carlo," Economics Working Papers 2020-01, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    4. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    5. Delis, Manthos D. & Tsionas, Mike G., 2018. "Measuring management practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 65-77.
    6. Matias Quiroz & Robert Kohn & Mattias Villani & Minh-Ngoc Tran, 2019. "Speeding Up MCMC by Efficient Data Subsampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 831-843, April.
    7. Tsionas, Mike G. & Michaelides, Panayotis G., 2017. "Bayesian analysis of chaos: The joint return-volatility dynamical system," MPRA Paper 80632, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. James M. Nason & Gregor W. Smith, 2021. "Measuring the slowly evolving trend in US inflation with professional forecasts," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Virbickaitė, Audronė & Frey, Christoph & Macedo, Demian N., 2020. "Bayesian sequential stock return prediction through copulas," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    10. Feng, Jingxue & Wang, Liangliang, 2024. "A switching state-space transmission model for tracking epidemics and assessing interventions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Tsionas, Mike G. & Michaelides, Panayotis G., 2017. "Neglected chaos in international stock markets: Bayesian analysis of the joint return–volatility dynamical system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 95-107.
    12. Golightly Andrew & Wilkinson Darren J., 2015. "Bayesian inference for Markov jump processes with informative observations," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 169-188, April.
    13. Wei Wei & Asger Lunde, 2023. "Identifying Risk Factors and Their Premia: A Study on Electricity Prices," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 1647-1679.
    14. Espen Bernton & Pierre E. Jacob & Mathieu Gerber & Christian P. Robert, 2019. "Approximate Bayesian computation with the Wasserstein distance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 235-269, April.
    15. David A Rasmussen & Erik M Volz & Katia Koelle, 2014. "Phylodynamic Inference for Structured Epidemiological Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Chris Sherlock, 2016. "Optimal Scaling for the Pseudo-Marginal Random Walk Metropolis: Insensitivity to the Noise Generating Mechanism," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 869-884, September.
    17. Radu Herbei & L. Mark Berliner, 2014. "Estimating Ocean Circulation: An MCMC Approach With Approximated Likelihoods via the Bernoulli Factory," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 944-954, September.
    18. Scharth, Marcel & Kohn, Robert, 2016. "Particle efficient importance sampling," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 133-147.
    19. Wolf, Elias, 2023. "Estimating Growth at Risk with Skewed Stochastic Volatility Models," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277696, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. N. Englezos & X. Kartala & P. Koundouri & M. Tsionas & A. Alamanos, 2023. "A Novel HydroEconomic - Econometric Approach for Integrated Transboundary Water Management Under Uncertainty," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(4), pages 975-1030, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.