IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanistic Mathematical Modeling Tests Hypotheses of the Neurovascular Coupling in fMRI

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Lundengård
  • Gunnar Cedersund
  • Sebastian Sten
  • Felix Leong
  • Alexander Smedberg
  • Fredrik Elinder
  • Maria Engström

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures brain activity by detecting the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to neural activity. The BOLD response depends on the neurovascular coupling, which connects cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and deoxyhemoglobin level to neuronal activity. The exact mechanisms behind this neurovascular coupling are not yet fully investigated. There are at least three different ways in which these mechanisms are being discussed. Firstly, mathematical models involving the so-called Balloon model describes the relation between oxygen metabolism, cerebral blood volume, and cerebral blood flow. However, the Balloon model does not describe cellular and biochemical mechanisms. Secondly, the metabolic feedback hypothesis, which is based on experimental findings on metabolism associated with brain activation, and thirdly, the neurotransmitter feed-forward hypothesis which describes intracellular pathways leading to vasoactive substance release. Both the metabolic feedback and the neurotransmitter feed-forward hypotheses have been extensively studied, but only experimentally. These two hypotheses have never been implemented as mathematical models. Here we investigate these two hypotheses by mechanistic mathematical modeling using a systems biology approach; these methods have been used in biological research for many years but never been applied to the BOLD response in fMRI. In the current work, model structures describing the metabolic feedback and the neurotransmitter feed-forward hypotheses were applied to measured BOLD responses in the visual cortex of 12 healthy volunteers. Evaluating each hypothesis separately shows that neither hypothesis alone can describe the data in a biologically plausible way. However, by adding metabolism to the neurotransmitter feed-forward model structure, we obtained a new model structure which is able to fit the estimation data and successfully predict new, independent validation data. These results open the door to a new type of fMRI analysis that more accurately reflects the true neuronal activity.Author Summary: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a widely used technique for measuring brain activity. However, the signal registered by fMRI is not a direct measurement of the neuronal activity in the brain, but it is influenced by the interplay between the metabolism, blood flow and blood volume in the active area. This signal is called the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response and occurs when the blood supply to the active area increases in response to neuronal activity. The mechanisms that the cells use to influence the blood supply are not fully known, and therefore it is difficult to know the true neuronal signalling only from inspection of the fMRI signal. In this article, we present a new mathematical model built on the physiological mechanisms thought to underlie the BOLD response. We could successfully fit the model to data and predict the activity caused by new stimuli. By using the validated model we investigated physiological mechanisms that cause different parts of the BOLD response.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Lundengård & Gunnar Cedersund & Sebastian Sten & Felix Leong & Alexander Smedberg & Fredrik Elinder & Maria Engström, 2016. "Mechanistic Mathematical Modeling Tests Hypotheses of the Neurovascular Coupling in fMRI," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004971
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004971
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004971&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikos K. Logothetis & Jon Pauls & Mark Augath & Torsten Trinath & Axel Oeltermann, 2001. "Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6843), pages 150-157, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doungmo Goufo, Emile F. & Mbehou, Mohamed & Kamga Pene, Morgan M., 2018. "A peculiar application of Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative in neuroscience: Chaotic burst dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 170-176.
    2. Irene Neuner & Wolfram Kawohl & Jorge Arrubla & Tracy Warbrick & Konrad Hitz & Christine Wyss & Frank Boers & N Jon Shah, 2014. "Cortical Response Variation with Different Sound Pressure Levels: A Combined Event-Related Potentials and fMRI Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Zvi N. Roth & Kendrick Kay & Elisha P. Merriam, 2022. "Natural scene sampling reveals reliable coarse-scale orientation tuning in human V1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Phoebe Koundouri & Barbara Hammer & Ulrike Kuhl & Alina Velias, 2022. "Behavioral and Neuroeconomics of Environmental Values," DEOS Working Papers 2227, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    5. Wan-Yu Shih & Hsiang-Yu Yu & Cheng-Chia Lee & Chien-Chen Chou & Chien Chen & Paul W. Glimcher & Shih-Wei Wu, 2023. "Electrophysiological population dynamics reveal context dependencies during decision making in human frontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Simon A Overduin & Philip Servos, 2008. "Symmetric Sensorimotor Somatotopy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-6, January.
    7. Amrita Pal & Jennifer A Ogren & Ravi S Aysola & Rajesh Kumar & Luke A Henderson & Ronald M Harper & Paul M Macey, 2021. "Insular functional organization during handgrip in females and males with obstructive sleep apnea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Gavin Perry & Nathan W Taylor & Philippa C H Bothwell & Colette C Milbourn & Georgina Powell & Krish D Singh, 2020. "The gamma response to colour hue in humans: Evidence from MEG," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Olsen, Carmen & Gold, Anna, 2018. "Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 127-141.
    10. Ujwal Chaudhary & Bin Xia & Stefano Silvoni & Leonardo G Cohen & Niels Birbaumer, 2017. "Brain–Computer Interface–Based Communication in the Completely Locked-In State," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Chaogan Yan & Dongqiang Liu & Yong He & Qihong Zou & Chaozhe Zhu & Xinian Zuo & Xiangyu Long & Yufeng Zang, 2009. "Spontaneous Brain Activity in the Default Mode Network Is Sensitive to Different Resting-State Conditions with Limited Cognitive Load," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Laurens Winkelmeier & Carla Filosa & Renée Hartig & Max Scheller & Markus Sack & Jonathan R. Reinwald & Robert Becker & David Wolf & Martin Fungisai Gerchen & Alexander Sartorius & Andreas Meyer-Linde, 2022. "Striatal hub of dynamic and stabilized prediction coding in forebrain networks for olfactory reinforcement learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Ani Eloyan & Shanshan Li & John Muschelli & Jim J Pekar & Stewart H Mostofsky & Brian S Caffo, 2014. "Analytic Programming with fMRI Data: A Quick-Start Guide for Statisticians Using R," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Ai-Ling Hsu & Kun-Hsien Chou & Yi-Ping Chao & Hsin-Ya Fan & Changwei W Wu & Jyh-Horng Chen, 2016. "Physiological Contribution in Spontaneous Oscillations: An Approximate Quality-Assurance Index for Resting-State fMRI Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Jacob A. Westerberg & Jeffrey D. Schall & Geoffrey F. Woodman & Alexander Maier, 2023. "Feedforward attentional selection in sensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Qingfang Liu & Yao Zhao & Sumedha Attanti & Joel L. Voss & Geoffrey Schoenbaum & Thorsten Kahnt, 2024. "Midbrain signaling of identity prediction errors depends on orbitofrontal cortex networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Kim, Sang-Yoon & Lim, Woochang, 2015. "Effect of small-world connectivity on fast sparsely synchronized cortical rhythms," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 109-123.
    18. Adrián Ponce-Alvarez & Biyu J He & Patric Hagmann & Gustavo Deco, 2015. "Task-Driven Activity Reduces the Cortical Activity Space of the Brain: Experiment and Whole-Brain Modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Marcus Görge Ullisch & Jürgen Johann Scheins & Christoph Weirich & Elena Rota Kops & Abdullah Celik & Lutz Tellmann & Tony Stöcker & Hans Herzog & Nadim Jon Shah, 2012. "MR-Based PET Motion Correction Procedure for Simultaneous MR-PET Neuroimaging of Human Brain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-13, November.
    20. Stéphane Sockeel & Denis Schwartz & Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac & Habib Benali, 2016. "Large-Scale Functional Networks Identified from Resting-State EEG Using Spatial ICA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.