IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Dynamics in MSTd: A Mechanism for Robust Heading Perception Based on Optic Flow

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver W Layton
  • Brett R Fajen

Abstract

Human heading perception based on optic flow is not only accurate, it is also remarkably robust and stable. These qualities are especially apparent when observers move through environments containing other moving objects, which introduce optic flow that is inconsistent with observer self-motion and therefore uninformative about heading direction. Moving objects may also occupy large portions of the visual field and occlude regions of the background optic flow that are most informative about heading perception. The fact that heading perception is biased by no more than a few degrees under such conditions attests to the robustness of the visual system and warrants further investigation. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether recurrent, competitive dynamics among MSTd neurons that serve to reduce uncertainty about heading over time offer a plausible mechanism for capturing the robustness of human heading perception. Simulations of existing heading models that do not contain competitive dynamics yield heading estimates that are far more erratic and unstable than human judgments. We present a dynamical model of primate visual areas V1, MT, and MSTd based on that of Layton, Mingolla, and Browning that is similar to the other models, except that the model includes recurrent interactions among model MSTd neurons. Competitive dynamics stabilize the model’s heading estimate over time, even when a moving object crosses the future path. Soft winner-take-all dynamics enhance units that code a heading direction consistent with the time history and suppress responses to transient changes to the optic flow field. Our findings support recurrent competitive temporal dynamics as a crucial mechanism underlying the robustness and stability of perception of heading.Author Summary: Humans have little difficulty moving around in dynamic environments containing other moving objects. Previous research has demonstrated that moving objects may induce biases in perceived heading in some circumstances. Nevertheless, heading perception is surprisingly robust and stable. Even when large moving objects occupy much of the visual field and block our view of the future path, errors in heading judgments are surprisingly small—usually less than several degrees of visual angle. Furthermore, perceived heading does not abruptly shift or fluctuate as moving objects sweep across the observer’s future path. The aim of the present study is to investigate the qualities of our visual system that lead to such robust heading perception. We simulated two existing models that specify different heading mechanisms within the visual system and found that they could not capture the robustness and stability of human heading perception in dynamic environments. We then introduced the competitive dynamics model that succeeds due to its reliance on recurrent, competitive interactions among neurons that unfold over time that stabilize heading estimates. Our results suggest that competitive interactions within the visual system underlie the robustness and stability of human heading perception.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver W Layton & Brett R Fajen, 2016. "Competitive Dynamics in MSTd: A Mechanism for Robust Heading Perception Based on Optic Flow," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-37, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004942
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004942&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gina G. Turrigiano & Kenneth R. Leslie & Niraj S. Desai & Lana C. Rutherford & Sacha B. Nelson, 1998. "Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 391(6670), pages 892-896, February.
    2. Christopher C. Pack & Vladimir K. Berezovskii & Richard T. Born, 2001. "Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert and anaesthetized macaque monkeys," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6866), pages 905-908, December.
    3. Oliver W Layton & N Andrew Browning, 2014. "A Unified Model of Heading and Path Perception in Primate MSTd," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Saponati & Martin Vinck, 2023. "Sequence anticipation and spike-timing-dependent plasticity emerge from a predictive learning rule," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Niranjan Chakravarthy & Shivkumar Sabesan & Kostas Tsakalis & Leon Iasemidis, 2009. "Controlling epileptic seizures in a neural mass model," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 98-116, January.
    3. Damien M O’Halloran, 2020. "Simulation model of CA1 pyramidal neurons reveal opposing roles for the Na+/Ca2+ exchange current and Ca2+-activated K+ current during spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    5. Dean J. Kareemo & Christina S. Winborn & Samantha S. Olah & Carley N. Miller & JungMin Kim & Chelsie A. Kadgien & Hannah S. Actor-Engel & Harrison J. Ramsay & Austin M. Ramsey & Jason Aoto & Matthew J, 2024. "Genetically encoded intrabody probes for labeling and manipulating AMPA-type glutamate receptors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Christian Keck & Cristina Savin & Jörg Lücke, 2012. "Feedforward Inhibition and Synaptic Scaling – Two Sides of the Same Coin?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Iris Reuveni & Sourav Ghosh & Edi Barkai, 2017. "Real Time Multiplicative Memory Amplification Mediated by Whole-Cell Scaling of Synaptic Response in Key Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, January.
    8. Jimok Kim & Richard W Tsien & Bradley E Alger, 2012. "An Improved Test for Detecting Multiplicative Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-9, May.
    9. Christoph Hartmann & Andreea Lazar & Bernhard Nessler & Jochen Triesch, 2015. "Where’s the Noise? Key Features of Spontaneous Activity and Neural Variability Arise through Learning in a Deterministic Network," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-35, December.
    10. Julijana Gjorgjieva & Taro Toyoizumi & Stephen J Eglen, 2009. "Burst-Time-Dependent Plasticity Robustly Guides ON/OFF Segregation in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Mizusaki, Beatriz E.P. & Agnes, Everton J. & Erichsen, Rubem & Brunnet, Leonardo G., 2017. "Learning and retrieval behavior in recurrent neural networks with pre-synaptic dependent homeostatic plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 279-286.
    12. Giorgia Dellaferrera & Stanisław Woźniak & Giacomo Indiveri & Angeliki Pantazi & Evangelos Eleftheriou, 2022. "Introducing principles of synaptic integration in the optimization of deep neural networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Aseel Shomar & Lukas Geyrhofer & Noam E Ziv & Naama Brenner, 2017. "Cooperative stochastic binding and unbinding explain synaptic size dynamics and statistics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, July.
    14. John Palmer & Adam Keane & Pulin Gong, 2017. "Learning and executing goal-directed choices by internally generated sequences in spiking neural circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Angulo-Garcia, David & Torcini, Alessandro, 2014. "Stable chaos in fluctuation driven neural circuits," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 233-245.
    16. Georg Martius & Ralf Der & Nihat Ay, 2013. "Information Driven Self-Organization of Complex Robotic Behaviors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Tiziano D’Albis & Richard Kempter, 2017. "A single-cell spiking model for the origin of grid-cell patterns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-41, October.
    18. Oliver Welzel & Carsten H Tischbirek & Jasmin Jung & Eva M Kohler & Alexei Svetlitchny & Andreas W Henkel & Johannes Kornhuber & Teja W Groemer, 2010. "Synapse Clusters Are Preferentially Formed by Synapses with Large Recycling Pool Sizes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-9, October.
    19. Juan Prada & Manju Sasi & Corinna Martin & Sibylle Jablonka & Thomas Dandekar & Robert Blum, 2018. "An open source tool for automatic spatiotemporal assessment of calcium transients and local ‘signal-close-to-noise’ activity in calcium imaging data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-34, March.
    20. Maxime Lemieux & Narges Karimi & Frederic Bretzner, 2024. "Functional plasticity of glutamatergic neurons of medullary reticular nuclei after spinal cord injury in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.