IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Robust Feedforward Model of the Olfactory System

Author

Listed:
  • Yilun Zhang
  • Tatyana O Sharpee

Abstract

Most natural odors have sparse molecular composition. This makes the principles of compressed sensing potentially relevant to the structure of the olfactory code. Yet, the largely feedforward organization of the olfactory system precludes reconstruction using standard compressed sensing algorithms. To resolve this problem, recent theoretical work has shown that signal reconstruction could take place as a result of a low dimensional dynamical system converging to one of its attractor states. However, the dynamical aspects of optimization slowed down odor recognition and were also found to be susceptible to noise. Here we describe a feedforward model of the olfactory system that achieves both strong compression and fast reconstruction that is also robust to noise. A key feature of the proposed model is a specific relationship between how odors are represented at the glomeruli stage, which corresponds to a compression, and the connections from glomeruli to third-order neurons (neurons in the olfactory cortex of vertebrates or Kenyon cells in the mushroom body of insects), which in the model corresponds to reconstruction. We show that should this specific relationship hold true, the reconstruction will be both fast and robust to noise, and in particular to the false activation of glomeruli. The predicted connectivity rate from glomeruli to third-order neurons can be tested experimentally.Author Summary: Many olfactory systems are capable of accurately sensing a minimum of thousands of different odorants using as few as hundreds of different receptors. This compression raises the possibility that the mathematical properties of compressed sensing might be relevant to olfaction, similar to how these properties were found relevant to other sensory systems. In olfaction, previous applications of compressed sensing algorithms relied on the dynamics of neural circuits to reconstruct high dimensional signals. Such approaches are relatively temporally inefficient and sensitive to noise. To overcome these problems, we propose a purely feedforward compressed sensing model of the olfactory system where high dimensional signals can be recovered with a single feedforward layer of neural processing. The reconstructions are shown to be robust to noise, account for a number of experimental observations, and because of the feedforward structure are temporally efficient. Using the model, we make predictions that can be tested in future experiments with respect to optimal connectivity within the olfactory system. Our results indicate that feedforward neural architectures can provide an efficient way to implement compressed sensing in neural systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yilun Zhang & Tatyana O Sharpee, 2016. "A Robust Feedforward Model of the Olfactory System," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004850
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004850
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004850&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sophie J. C. Caron & Vanessa Ruta & L. F. Abbott & Richard Axel, 2013. "Random convergence of olfactory inputs in the Drosophila mushroom body," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7447), pages 113-117, May.
    2. Shawn R. Olsen & Rachel I. Wilson, 2008. "Lateral presynaptic inhibition mediates gain control in an olfactory circuit," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7190), pages 956-960, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tyler R. Sizemore & Julius Jonaitis & Andrew M. Dacks, 2023. "Heterogeneous receptor expression underlies non-uniform peptidergic modulation of olfaction in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Mami Nakamizo-Dojo & Kenichi Ishii & Jiro Yoshino & Masato Tsuji & Kazuo Emoto, 2023. "Descending GABAergic pathway links brain sugar-sensing to peripheral nociceptive gating in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Ishani Ganguly & Emily L. Heckman & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & E. Josephine Clowney & Rudy Behnia, 2024. "Diversity of visual inputs to Kenyon cells of the Drosophila mushroom body," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Kaitlyn Elizabeth Ellis & Sven Bervoets & Hayley Smihula & Ishani Ganguly & Eva Vigato & Thomas O. Auer & Richard Benton & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Sophie Jeanne Cécile Caron, 2024. "Evolution of connectivity architecture in the Drosophila mushroom body," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Hagai Lalazar & L F Abbott & Eilon Vaadia, 2016. "Tuning Curves for Arm Posture Control in Motor Cortex Are Consistent with Random Connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Eyal Rozenfeld & Nadine Ehmann & Julia E. Manoim & Robert J. Kittel & Moshe Parnas, 2023. "Homeostatic synaptic plasticity rescues neural coding reliability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Christian Keck & Cristina Savin & Jörg Lücke, 2012. "Feedforward Inhibition and Synaptic Scaling – Two Sides of the Same Coin?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Eyal Rozenfeld & Merav Tauber & Yair Ben-Chaim & Moshe Parnas, 2021. "GPCR voltage dependence controls neuronal plasticity and behavior," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Sanjoy Dasgupta & Daisuke Hattori & Saket Navlakha, 2022. "A neural theory for counting memories," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Tugce Yildizoglu & Jan-Marek Weislogel & Farhan Mohammad & Edwin S-Y Chan & Pryseley N Assam & Adam Claridge-Chang, 2015. "Estimating Information Processing in a Memory System: The Utility of Meta-analytic Methods for Genetics," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Jean-Pierre Rospars & Alexandre Grémiaux & David Jarriault & Antoine Chaffiol & Christelle Monsempes & Nina Deisig & Sylvia Anton & Philippe Lucas & Dominique Martinez, 2014. "Heterogeneity and Convergence of Olfactory First-Order Neurons Account for the High Speed and Sensitivity of Second-Order Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Inga Petelski & Yannick Günzel & Sercan Sayin & Susanne Kraus & Einat Couzin-Fuchs, 2024. "Synergistic olfactory processing for social plasticity in desert locusts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.