IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Search, Social Media, and Traditional Data Sources to Improve Influenza Surveillance

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Santillana
  • André T Nguyen
  • Mark Dredze
  • Michael J Paul
  • Elaine O Nsoesie
  • John S Brownstein

Abstract

We present a machine learning-based methodology capable of providing real-time (“nowcast”) and forecast estimates of influenza activity in the US by leveraging data from multiple data sources including: Google searches, Twitter microblogs, nearly real-time hospital visit records, and data from a participatory surveillance system. Our main contribution consists of combining multiple influenza-like illnesses (ILI) activity estimates, generated independently with each data source, into a single prediction of ILI utilizing machine learning ensemble approaches. Our methodology exploits the information in each data source and produces accurate weekly ILI predictions for up to four weeks ahead of the release of CDC’s ILI reports. We evaluate the predictive ability of our ensemble approach during the 2013–2014 (retrospective) and 2014–2015 (live) flu seasons for each of the four weekly time horizons. Our ensemble approach demonstrates several advantages: (1) our ensemble method’s predictions outperform every prediction using each data source independently, (2) our methodology can produce predictions one week ahead of GFT’s real-time estimates with comparable accuracy, and (3) our two and three week forecast estimates have comparable accuracy to real-time predictions using an autoregressive model. Moreover, our results show that considerable insight is gained from incorporating disparate data streams, in the form of social media and crowd sourced data, into influenza predictions in all time horizons.Author Summary: The aggregated activity patterns of Internet users have enabled the detection and tracking of multiple population-wide events such as disease outbreaks, financial markets performance, and preferences in online movie selections. As a consequence, a collection of mathematical models aiming at monitoring and predicting these events in real-time have been proposed in the past decade. As we discover new methods and data sources suitable to track these events, it is not clear whether more information will lead to improved predictions. In the context of digital disease detection at the population level, we show that it is advantageous to combine the information from multiple flu activity predictors in the US instead of simply choosing the best performing flu predictor. Our findings suggest that the information from multiple data sources such as Google searches, Twitter microblogs, nearly real-time hospital visit records, and data from a participatory surveillance system, complement one another and produce the most accurate and robust set of flu predictions when combined optimally.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Santillana & André T Nguyen & Mark Dredze & Michael J Paul & Elaine O Nsoesie & John S Brownstein, 2015. "Combining Search, Social Media, and Traditional Data Sources to Improve Influenza Surveillance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004513
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004513
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004513&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wan Yang & Alicia Karspeck & Jeffrey Shaman, 2014. "Comparison of Filtering Methods for the Modeling and Retrospective Forecasting of Influenza Epidemics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Pollett & Benjamin M Althouse & Brett Forshey & George W Rutherford & Richard G Jarman, 2017. "Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Zimmer & Reza Yaesoubi & Ted Cohen, 2017. "A Likelihood Approach for Real-Time Calibration of Stochastic Compartmental Epidemic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Song, Jialu & Xie, Hujin & Gao, Bingbing & Zhong, Yongmin & Gu, Chengfan & Choi, Kup-Sze, 2021. "Maximum likelihood-based extended Kalman filter for COVID-19 prediction," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Sabique Islam & Sirish Namilae & Richard Prazenica & Dahai Liu, 2020. "Fuel shortages during hurricanes: Epidemiological modeling and optimal control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Nicholas G Reich & Craig J McGowan & Teresa K Yamana & Abhinav Tushar & Evan L Ray & Dave Osthus & Sasikiran Kandula & Logan C Brooks & Willow Crawford-Crudell & Graham Casey Gibson & Evan Moore & Reb, 2019. "Accuracy of real-time multi-model ensemble forecasts for seasonal influenza in the U.S," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Michal Ben-Nun & Pete Riley & James Turtle & David P Bacon & Steven Riley, 2019. "Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Logan C Brooks & David C Farrow & Sangwon Hyun & Ryan J Tibshirani & Roni Rosenfeld, 2015. "Flexible Modeling of Epidemics with an Empirical Bayes Framework," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Sarah C Kramer & Jeffrey Shaman, 2019. "Development and validation of influenza forecasting for 64 temperate and tropical countries," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Canelle Poirier & Yulin Hswen & Guillaume Bouzillé & Marc Cuggia & Audrey Lavenu & John S Brownstein & Thomas Brewer & Mauricio Santillana, 2021. "Influenza forecasting for French regions combining EHR, web and climatic data sources with a machine learning ensemble approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Teresa K Yamana & Sasikiran Kandula & Jeffrey Shaman, 2017. "Individual versus superensemble forecasts of seasonal influenza outbreaks in the United States," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Sequoia I Leuba & Reza Yaesoubi & Marina Antillon & Ted Cohen & Christoph Zimmer, 2020. "Tracking and predicting U.S. influenza activity with a real-time surveillance network," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Sarah C Kramer & Sen Pei & Jeffrey Shaman, 2020. "Forecasting influenza in Europe using a metapopulation model incorporating cross-border commuting and air travel," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Jeffrey Shaman & Sasikiran Kandula & Wan Yang & Alicia Karspeck, 2017. "The use of ambient humidity conditions to improve influenza forecast," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Evan L Ray & Nicholas G Reich, 2018. "Prediction of infectious disease epidemics via weighted density ensembles," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Taichi Murayama & Nobuyuki Shimizu & Sumio Fujita & Shoko Wakamiya & Eiji Aramaki, 2020. "Robust two-stage influenza prediction model considering regular and irregular trends," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Baek, Changryong & Davis, Richard A. & Pipiras, Vladas, 2017. "Sparse seasonal and periodic vector autoregressive modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 103-126.
    16. Kyle S Hickmann & Geoffrey Fairchild & Reid Priedhorsky & Nicholas Generous & James M Hyman & Alina Deshpande & Sara Y Del Valle, 2015. "Forecasting the 2013–2014 Influenza Season Using Wikipedia," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.