IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De Novo Prediction of PTBP1 Binding and Splicing Targets Reveals Unexpected Features of Its RNA Recognition and Function

Author

Listed:
  • Areum Han
  • Peter Stoilov
  • Anthony J Linares
  • Yu Zhou
  • Xiang-Dong Fu
  • Douglas L Black

Abstract

The splicing regulator Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein (PTBP1) has four RNA binding domains that each binds a short pyrimidine element, allowing recognition of diverse pyrimidine-rich sequences. This variation makes it difficult to evaluate PTBP1 binding to particular sites based on sequence alone and thus to identify target RNAs. Conversely, transcriptome-wide binding assays such as CLIP identify many in vivo targets, but do not provide a quantitative assessment of binding and are informative only for the cells where the analysis is performed. A general method of predicting PTBP1 binding and possible targets in any cell type is needed. We developed computational models that predict the binding and splicing targets of PTBP1. A Hidden Markov Model (HMM), trained on CLIP-seq data, was used to score probable PTBP1 binding sites. Scores from this model are highly correlated (ρ = −0.9) with experimentally determined dissociation constants. Notably, we find that the protein is not strictly pyrimidine specific, as interspersed Guanosine residues are well tolerated within PTBP1 binding sites. This model identifies many previously unrecognized PTBP1 binding sites, and can score PTBP1 binding across the transcriptome in the absence of CLIP data. Using this model to examine the placement of PTBP1 binding sites in controlling splicing, we trained a multinomial logistic model on sets of PTBP1 regulated and unregulated exons. Applying this model to rank exons across the mouse transcriptome identifies known PTBP1 targets and many new exons that were confirmed as PTBP1-repressed by RT-PCR and RNA-seq after PTBP1 depletion. We find that PTBP1 dependent exons are diverse in structure and do not all fit previous descriptions of the placement of PTBP1 binding sites. Our study uncovers new features of RNA recognition and splicing regulation by PTBP1. This approach can be applied to other multi-RRM domain proteins to assess binding site degeneracy and multifactorial splicing regulation.Author Summary: A key step in the regulation of mammalian genes is the splicing of the messenger RNA precursor to produce a mature mRNA that can be translated into a particular protein needed by the cell. Through the process of alternative splicing, mRNAs encoding different proteins can be derived from the same primary gene transcript. The regulation of this process plays essential roles in the development of differentiated tissues and is mediated by special pre-mRNA binding proteins. To understand how these proteins control gene expression, one must characterize what they recognize in RNA and identify these binding sites across the genome in order to predict their targets. Models that allow this prediction are essential to understanding developmental regulatory programs and their perturbation by disease causing mutations. In this study, we use statistical methods to build models of RNA recognition by the important splicing regulator PTBP1 and then apply these models to predict PTBP1 regulation of new gene transcripts. We show that PTBP1 has different specificity for RNA than was previously recognized and that its target exons are more diverse than was known before. There are many similar splicing regulators in mammalian cells, and these analyses provide a general framework for the computational analysis of their RNA binding and target identification.

Suggested Citation

  • Areum Han & Peter Stoilov & Anthony J Linares & Yu Zhou & Xiang-Dong Fu & Douglas L Black, 2014. "De Novo Prediction of PTBP1 Binding and Splicing Targets Reveals Unexpected Features of Its RNA Recognition and Function," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003442
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003442
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003442&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric T. Wang & Rickard Sandberg & Shujun Luo & Irina Khrebtukova & Lu Zhang & Christine Mayr & Stephen F. Kingsmore & Gary P. Schroth & Christopher B. Burge, 2008. "Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7221), pages 470-476, November.
    2. Yoseph Barash & John A. Calarco & Weijun Gao & Qun Pan & Xinchen Wang & Ofer Shai & Benjamin J. Blencowe & Brendan J. Frey, 2010. "Deciphering the splicing code," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7294), pages 53-59, May.
    3. Jernej Ule & Giovanni Stefani & Aldo Mele & Matteo Ruggiu & Xuning Wang & Bahar Taneri & Terry Gaasterland & Benjamin J. Blencowe & Robert B. Darnell, 2006. "An RNA map predicting Nova-dependent splicing regulation," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7119), pages 580-586, November.
    4. Donny D. Licatalosi & Aldo Mele & John J. Fak & Jernej Ule & Melis Kayikci & Sung Wook Chi & Tyson A. Clark & Anthony C. Schweitzer & John E. Blume & Xuning Wang & Jennifer C. Darnell & Robert B. Darn, 2008. "HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7221), pages 464-469, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ya′nan Zhu & Jing He & Jiawen Wang & Wei Guo & Hongran Liu & Zhuoran Song & Le Kang, 2024. "Parental experiences orchestrate locust egg hatching synchrony by regulating nuclear export of precursor miRNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna & Alex J. Felix & Elisa A. Waxman & Congsheng Cheng & Defne A. Amado & Paul T. Ranum & Alexey Bogush & Lea V. Dungan & Jean Ann Maguire & Alyssa L. Gagne & Elizabeth A. Hell, 2023. "Mapping PTBP2 binding in human brain identifies SYNGAP1 as a target for therapeutic splice switching," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Haoqing Shen & Omer An & Xi Ren & Yangyang Song & Sze Jing Tang & Xin-Yu Ke & Jian Han & Daryl Jin Tai Tay & Vanessa Hui En Ng & Fernando Bellido Molias & Priyankaa Pitcheshwar & Ka Wai Leong & Ker-Ka, 2022. "ADARs act as potent regulators of circular transcriptome in cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth A. Werren & Geneva R. LaForce & Anshika Srivastava & Delia R. Perillo & Shaokun Li & Katherine Johnson & Safa Baris & Brandon Berger & Samantha L. Regan & Christian D. Pfennig & Sonja Munnik, 2024. "TREX tetramer disruption alters RNA processing necessary for corticogenesis in THOC6 Intellectual Disability Syndrome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares & Guillermo E. Parada & Hei Yuen Wong & Ragini Medhi & Giulia Furlan & Roberto Munita & Eric A. Miska & Chun Kit Kwok & Martin Hemberg, 2022. "Alternative splicing modulation by G-quadruplexes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Wei Hu & Yangjun Wu & Qili Shi & Jingni Wu & Deping Kong & Xiaohua Wu & Xianghuo He & Teng Liu & Shengli Li, 2022. "Systematic characterization of cancer transcriptome at transcript resolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Xiangbin Ruan & Kaining Hu & Xiaochang Zhang, 2023. "PIE-seq: identifying RNA-binding protein targets by dual RNA-deaminase editing and sequencing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Yocelyn Recinos & Dmytro Ustianenko & Yow-Tyng Yeh & Xiaojian Wang & Martin Jacko & Lekha V. Yesantharao & Qiyang Wu & Chaolin Zhang, 2024. "CRISPR-dCas13d-based deep screening of proximal and distal splicing-regulatory elements," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Zhiping Zhang & Bongmin Bae & Winston H. Cuddleston & Pedro Miura, 2023. "Coordination of alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation revealed by targeted long read sequencing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Gustavo Glusman & Juan Caballero & Max Robinson & Burak Kutlu & Leroy Hood, 2013. "Optimal Scaling of Digital Transcriptomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    8. Ridvan Eksi & Hong-Dong Li & Rajasree Menon & Yuchen Wen & Gilbert S Omenn & Matthias Kretzler & Yuanfang Guan, 2013. "Systematically Differentiating Functions for Alternatively Spliced Isoforms through Integrating RNA-seq Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Xiaohong Li & Guy N Brock & Eric C Rouchka & Nigel G F Cooper & Dongfeng Wu & Timothy E O’Toole & Ryan S Gill & Abdallah M Eteleeb & Liz O’Brien & Shesh N Rai, 2017. "A comparison of per sample global scaling and per gene normalization methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Jun Inamo & Akari Suzuki & Mahoko Takahashi Ueda & Kensuke Yamaguchi & Hiroshi Nishida & Katsuya Suzuki & Yuko Kaneko & Tsutomu Takeuchi & Hiroaki Hatano & Kazuyoshi Ishigaki & Yasushi Ishihama & Kazu, 2024. "Long-read sequencing for 29 immune cell subsets reveals disease-linked isoforms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Feng Wang & Yang Xu & Robert Wang & Beatrice Zhang & Noah Smith & Amber Notaro & Samantha Gaerlan & Eric Kutschera & Kathryn E. Kadash-Edmondson & Yi Xing & Lan Lin, 2023. "TEQUILA-seq: a versatile and low-cost method for targeted long-read RNA sequencing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Patricia González-Rodríguez & Daniel J. Klionsky & Bertrand Joseph, 2022. "Autophagy regulation by RNA alternative splicing and implications in human diseases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Miklos Csuros & Igor B Rogozin & Eugene V Koonin, 2011. "A Detailed History of Intron-rich Eukaryotic Ancestors Inferred from a Global Survey of 100 Complete Genomes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.
    14. Nysia I George & John F Bowyer & Nathaniel M Crabtree & Ching-Wei Chang, 2015. "An Iterative Leave-One-Out Approach to Outlier Detection in RNA-Seq Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Tao Wang & Beibei Chen & MinSoo Kim & Yang Xie & Guanghua Xiao, 2014. "A Model-Based Approach to Identify Binding Sites in CLIP-Seq Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    16. Robert Stojnic & Audrey Qiuyan Fu & Boris Adryan, 2012. "A Graphical Modelling Approach to the Dissection of Highly Correlated Transcription Factor Binding Site Profiles," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Judith A Potashkin & Jose A Santiago & Bernard M Ravina & Arthur Watts & Alexey A Leontovich, 2012. "Biosignatures for Parkinson’s Disease and Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Shivali Patel & Alec N. Sexton & Madison S. Strine & Craig B. Wilen & Matthew D. Simon & Anna Marie Pyle, 2023. "Systematic detection of tertiary structural modules in large RNAs and RNP interfaces by Tb-seq," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Jiang Lin & Jing Yang & Xiang-mei Wen & Lei Yang & Zhao-qun Deng & Zhen Qian & Ji-chun Ma & Hong Guo & Ying-ying Zhang & Wei Qian & Jun Qian, 2014. "Detection of SRSF2-P95 Mutation by High-Resolution Melting Curve Analysis and Its Effect on Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndrome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Jianfei Hu & Eli Boritz & William Wylie & Daniel C Douek, 2017. "Stochastic principles governing alternative splicing of RNA," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.