IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machines vs. Ensembles: Effective MAPK Signaling through Heterogeneous Sets of Protein Complexes

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Suderman
  • Eric J Deeds

Abstract

Despite the importance of intracellular signaling networks, there is currently no consensus regarding the fundamental nature of the protein complexes such networks employ. One prominent view involves stable signaling machines with well-defined quaternary structures. The combinatorial complexity of signaling networks has led to an opposing perspective, namely that signaling proceeds via heterogeneous pleiomorphic ensembles of transient complexes. Since many hypotheses regarding network function rely on how we conceptualize signaling complexes, resolving this issue is a central problem in systems biology. Unfortunately, direct experimental characterization of these complexes has proven technologically difficult, while combinatorial complexity has prevented traditional modeling methods from approaching this question. Here we employ rule-based modeling, a technique that overcomes these limitations, to construct a model of the yeast pheromone signaling network. We found that this model exhibits significant ensemble character while generating reliable responses that match experimental observations. To contrast the ensemble behavior, we constructed a model that employs hierarchical assembly pathways to produce scaffold-based signaling machines. We found that this machine model could not replicate the experimentally observed combinatorial inhibition that arises when the scaffold is overexpressed. This finding provides evidence against the hierarchical assembly of machines in the pheromone signaling network and suggests that machines and ensembles may serve distinct purposes in vivo. In some cases, e.g. core enzymatic activities like protein synthesis and degradation, machines assembled via hierarchical energy landscapes may provide functional stability for the cell. In other cases, such as signaling, ensembles may represent a form of weak linkage, facilitating variation and plasticity in network evolution. The capacity of ensembles to signal effectively will ultimately shape how we conceptualize the function, evolution and engineering of signaling networks.Author Summary: Intracellular signaling networks are central to a cell's ability to adapt to its environment. Developing the capacity to effectively manipulate such networks would have a wide range of applications, from cancer therapy to synthetic biology. This requires a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of signal transduction, particularly the kinds of protein complexes that are formed during transmission of extracellular information to the nucleus. Traditionally, signaling complexes have been largely perceived (albeit often implicitly) as machine-like structures. However, the number of molecular complexes that could theoretically be formed by complex signaling networks is astronomically large. This has led to the pleiomorphic ensemble hypothesis, which posits that diverse and rapidly changing sets of transient protein complexes can transmit and process information. Our goal was to use computational approaches, specifically rule-based modeling, to test these hypotheses. We constructed a model of the prototypical yeast mating pathway and found significant ensemble-like behavior. Our results thus demonstrated that ensembles can in fact transmit extracellular signals with minimal noise. Additionally, a comparison of this model with one tailored to generate machine-like complexes displayed notable phenotypic differences, revealing potential advantages for ensemble-like signaling. Our demonstration that ensembles can function effectively will have a significant impact on how we conceptualize signaling and other processes inside cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Suderman & Eric J Deeds, 2013. "Machines vs. Ensembles: Effective MAPK Signaling through Heterogeneous Sets of Protein Complexes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003278
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003278
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003278&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard C. Yu & C. Gustavo Pesce & Alejandro Colman-Lerner & Larry Lok & David Pincus & Eduard Serra & Mark Holl & Kirsten Benjamin & Andrew Gordon & Roger Brent, 2008. "Negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast signalling," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7223), pages 755-761, December.
    2. Mohan Babu & James Vlasblom & Shuye Pu & Xinghua Guo & Chris Graham & Björn D. M. Bean & Helen E. Burston & Franco J. Vizeacoumar & Jamie Snider & Sadhna Phanse & Vincent Fong & Yuen Yi C. Tam & Micha, 2012. "Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7417), pages 585-589, September.
    3. Sina Ghaemmaghami & Won-Ki Huh & Kiowa Bower & Russell W. Howson & Archana Belle & Noah Dephoure & Erin K. O'Shea & Jonathan S. Weissman, 2003. "Global analysis of protein expression in yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6959), pages 737-741, October.
    4. Matthew Thomson & Jeremy Gunawardena, 2009. "Unlimited multistability in multisite phosphorylation systems," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7252), pages 274-277, July.
    5. Anne-Claude Gavin & Patrick Aloy & Paola Grandi & Roland Krause & Markus Boesche & Martina Marzioch & Christina Rau & Lars Juhl Jensen & Sonja Bastuck & Birgit Dümpelfeld & Angela Edelmann & Marie-Ann, 2006. "Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7084), pages 631-636, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Kyoung Kim & Eduardo D Sontag, 2017. "Reduction of multiscale stochastic biochemical reaction networks using exact moment derivation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Kazunari Iwamoto & Yuki Shindo & Koichi Takahashi, 2016. "Modeling Cellular Noise Underlying Heterogeneous Cell Responses in the Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling Pathway," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Anneke Brümmer & Carlos Salazar & Vittoria Zinzalla & Lilia Alberghina & Thomas Höfer, 2010. "Mathematical Modelling of DNA Replication Reveals a Trade-off between Coherence of Origin Activation and Robustness against Rereplication," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Emma Pierson & the GTEx Consortium & Daphne Koller & Alexis Battle & Sara Mostafavi, 2015. "Sharing and Specificity of Co-expression Networks across 35 Human Tissues," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Yannick Weyer & Sinead I. Schwabl & Xuechen Tang & Astha Purwar & Konstantin Siegmann & Angela Ruepp & Theresia Dunzendorfer-Matt & Michael A. Widerin & Veronika Niedrist & Noa J. M. Mutsters & Maria , 2024. "The Dsc ubiquitin ligase complex identifies transmembrane degrons to degrade orphaned proteins at the Golgi," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Michael D Barton & Daniela Delneri & Stephen G Oliver & Magnus Rattray & Casey M Bergman, 2010. "Evolutionary Systems Biology of Amino Acid Biosynthetic Cost in Yeast," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Zhdanov, Vladimir P., 2011. "Periodic perturbation of the bistable kinetics of gene expression," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(1), pages 57-64.
    8. Shinsuke Ohnuki & Yoshikazu Ohya, 2018. "High-dimensional single-cell phenotyping reveals extensive haploinsufficiency," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Carlo Chan & Xinfeng Liu & Liming Wang & Lee Bardwell & Qing Nie & Germán Enciso, 2012. "Protein Scaffolds Can Enhance the Bistability of Multisite Phosphorylation Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-9, June.
    10. Maja Bialecka-Fornal & Heun Jin Lee & Hannah A DeBerg & Chris S Gandhi & Rob Phillips, 2012. "Single-Cell Census of Mechanosensitive Channels in Living Bacteria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
    11. Löb, Daniel & Priester, Christopher & Drossel, Barbara, 2016. "Multistability and sustained oscillations in a model for protein complex formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 445(C), pages 85-101.
    12. Brian J. Caldwell & Andrew S. Norris & Caroline F. Karbowski & Alyssa M. Wiegand & Vicki H. Wysocki & Charles E. Bell, 2022. "Structure of a RecT/Redβ family recombinase in complex with a duplex intermediate of DNA annealing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Nebojsa Jukic & Alma P. Perrino & Frédéric Humbert & Aurélien Roux & Simon Scheuring, 2022. "Snf7 spirals sense and alter membrane curvature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Keisuke Obara & Taku Yoshikawa & Ryu Yamaguchi & Keiko Kuwata & Kunio Nakatsukasa & Kohei Nishimura & Takumi Kamura, 2022. "Proteolysis of adaptor protein Mmr1 during budding is necessary for mitochondrial homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Rudolf Hanel & Manfred Pöchacker & Manuel Schölling & Stefan Thurner, 2012. "A Self-Organized Model for Cell-Differentiation Based on Variations of Molecular Decay Rates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-9, May.
    16. Michael Chevalier & Ophelia Venturelli & Hana El-Samad, 2015. "The Impact of Different Sources of Fluctuations on Mutual Information in Biochemical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Yang-Nim Park & David Morales & Emily H Rubinson & Daniel Masison & Evan Eisenberg & Lois E Greene, 2012. "Differences in the Curing of [PSI+] Prion by Various Methods of Hsp104 Inactivation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Marc S Sherman & Barak A Cohen, 2014. "A Computational Framework for Analyzing Stochasticity in Gene Expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    19. Alexey A Gritsenko & Marc Hulsman & Marcel J T Reinders & Dick de Ridder, 2015. "Unbiased Quantitative Models of Protein Translation Derived from Ribosome Profiling Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Jason W Locasale & Arup K Chakraborty, 2008. "Regulation of Signal Duration and the Statistical Dynamics of Kinase Activation by Scaffold Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-12, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.