IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limited Agreement of Independent RNAi Screens for Virus-Required Host Genes Owes More to False-Negative than False-Positive Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Linhui Hao
  • Qiuling He
  • Zhishi Wang
  • Mark Craven
  • Michael A Newton
  • Paul Ahlquist

Abstract

Systematic, genome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) analysis is a powerful approach to identify gene functions that support or modulate selected biological processes. An emerging challenge shared with some other genome-wide approaches is that independent RNAi studies often show limited agreement in their lists of implicated genes. To better understand this, we analyzed four genome-wide RNAi studies that identified host genes involved in influenza virus replication. These studies collectively identified and validated the roles of 614 cell genes, but pair-wise overlap among the four gene lists was only 3% to 15% (average 6.7%). However, a number of functional categories were overrepresented in multiple studies. The pair-wise overlap of these enriched-category lists was high, ∼19%, implying more agreement among studies than apparent at the gene level. Probing this further, we found that the gene lists implicated by independent studies were highly connected in interacting networks by independent functional measures such as protein-protein interactions, at rates significantly higher than predicted by chance. We also developed a general, model-based approach to gauge the effects of false-positive and false-negative factors and to estimate, from a limited number of studies, the total number of genes involved in a process. For influenza virus replication, this novel statistical approach estimates the total number of cell genes involved to be ∼2,800. This and multiple other aspects of our experimental and computational results imply that, when following good quality control practices, the low overlap between studies is primarily due to false negatives rather than false-positive gene identifications. These results and methods have implications for and applications to multiple forms of genome-wide analysis.Author Summary: Genome-wide RNA interference assays of gene functions offer the potential for systematic, global analysis of biological processes. A pressing challenge is to develop meta-analysis methods that effectively combine information from multiple studies. One puzzle is that implicated gene lists from independent studies of the same process often show relatively low overlap. This disagreement might arise from false-positive factors, such as imperfect gene targeting (off-target effects), or from false negatives if separate studies access different components of large, complex systems. We present new methods to examine the relations between individual genome-wide RNAi studies, using studies of host genes in influenza virus replication as a test case. We find that cross-study agreement is greater than suggested by overlap of reported gene lists. This better agreement is evidenced by the strong relation of independent gene lists in functional pathways and protein interaction networks, and by a statistical model that relates multi-study, gene-level findings to factors driving correct, false-negative, and false-positive gene identification. Our analysis of multiple genome-wide studies predicts that there are many undetected host genes important for influenza virus infection, and that false negatives are the major concerns for genome-wide studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Linhui Hao & Qiuling He & Zhishi Wang & Mark Craven & Michael A Newton & Paul Ahlquist, 2013. "Limited Agreement of Independent RNAi Screens for Virus-Required Host Genes Owes More to False-Negative than False-Positive Factors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003235
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003235
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003235&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. October M. Sessions & Nicholas J. Barrows & Jayme A. Souza-Neto & Timothy J. Robinson & Christine L. Hershey & Mary A. Rodgers & Jose L. Ramirez & George Dimopoulos & Priscilla L. Yang & James L. Pear, 2009. "Discovery of insect and human dengue virus host factors," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7241), pages 1047-1050, April.
    2. Manoj N. Krishnan & Aylwin Ng & Bindu Sukumaran & Felicia D. Gilfoy & Pradeep D. Uchil & Hameeda Sultana & Abraham L. Brass & Rachel Adametz & Melody Tsui & Feng Qian & Ruth R. Montgomery & Sima Lev &, 2008. "RNA interference screen for human genes associated with West Nile virus infection," Nature, Nature, vol. 455(7210), pages 242-245, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T M Murali & Matthew D Dyer & David Badger & Brett M Tyler & Michael G Katze, 2011. "Network-Based Prediction and Analysis of HIV Dependency Factors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Deborah Chasman & Brandi Gancarz & Linhui Hao & Michael Ferris & Paul Ahlquist & Mark Craven, 2014. "Inferring Host Gene Subnetworks Involved in Viral Replication," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Raghuvir Viswanatha & Enzo Mameli & Jonathan Rodiger & Pierre Merckaert & Fabiana Feitosa-Suntheimer & Tonya M. Colpitts & Stephanie E. Mohr & Yanhui Hu & Norbert Perrimon, 2021. "Bioinformatic and cell-based tools for pooled CRISPR knockout screening in mosquitos," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Casey S Greene & Olga G Troyanskaya, 2012. "Chapter 2: Data-Driven View of Disease Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Abigail W Bigham & Kati J Buckingham & Sofia Husain & Mary J Emond & Kathryn M Bofferding & Heidi Gildersleeve & Ann Rutherford & Natalia M Astakhova & Andrey A Perelygin & Michael P Busch & Kristy O , 2011. "Host Genetic Risk Factors for West Nile Virus Infection and Disease Progression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.