IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensory Information and Encounter Rates of Interacting Species

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew M Hein
  • Scott A McKinley

Abstract

Most motile organisms use sensory cues when searching for resources, mates, or prey. The searcher measures sensory data and adjusts its search behavior based on those data. Yet, classical models of species encounter rates assume that searchers move independently of their targets. This assumption leads to the familiar mass action-like encounter rate kinetics typically used in modeling species interactions. Here we show that this common approach can mischaracterize encounter rate kinetics if searchers use sensory information to search actively for targets. We use the example of predator-prey interactions to illustrate that predators capable of long-distance directional sensing can encounter prey at a rate proportional to prey density to the power (where is the dimension of the environment) when prey density is low. Similar anomalous encounter rate functions emerge even when predators pursue prey using only noisy, directionless signals. Thus, in both the high-information extreme of long-distance directional sensing, and the low-information extreme of noisy non-directional sensing, encounter rate kinetics differ qualitatively from those derived by classic theory of species interactions. Using a standard model of predator-prey population dynamics, we show that the new encounter rate kinetics derived here can change the outcome of species interactions. Our results demonstrate how the use of sensory information can alter the rates and outcomes of physical interactions in biological systems.Author Summary: Encounters between individual organisms are an essential part of biology; in many sexually reproducing species, males and females must encounter one another in order to mate, pollinators must find flowers, and predators must locate prey before capturing and consuming them. Many species accomplish these tasks by actively searching for their targets using sensory information. Despite this, classical mathematical models used to predict the rate of encounters between searchers and their targets assume that searchers make movement decisions without using sensory information. Here we develop a mathematical framework for incorporating sensory information into searcher movement behavior to study how sensory response changes the relationship between encounter rate and target density. By comparing searchers that use sensory information to those that do not, we show that sensory response not only increases encounter rate, but that it also changes the form of the relationship between encounter rate and target density. By using sensory information, predators encounter prey at a rate that is less sensitive to changes in prey density when prey density is low. Our results demonstrate a strong connection between the usage of sensory information and the encounter rates that are so critical to survival and reproduction in nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew M Hein & Scott A McKinley, 2013. "Sensory Information and Encounter Rates of Interacting Species," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003178
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003178
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003178&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. M. Viswanathan & Sergey V. Buldyrev & Shlomo Havlin & M. G. E. da Luz & E. P. Raposo & H. Eugene Stanley, 1999. "Optimizing the success of random searches," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6756), pages 911-914, October.
    2. Christos C. Ioannou & Graeme D. Ruxton & Jens Krause, 2008. "Search rate, attack probability, and the relationship between prey density and prey encounter rate," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 842-846.
    3. Craig Packer & Marc Tatar & Anthony Collins, 1998. "Reproductive cessation in female mammals," Nature, Nature, vol. 392(6678), pages 807-811, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferreira, A.S. & Raposo, E.P. & Viswanathan, G.M. & da Luz, M.G.E., 2012. "The influence of the environment on Lévy random search efficiency: Fractality and memory effects," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3234-3246.
    2. Priscila C A da Silva & Tiago V Rosembach & Anésia A Santos & Márcio S Rocha & Marcelo L Martins, 2014. "Normal and Tumoral Melanocytes Exhibit q-Gaussian Random Search Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Ma, Brian O. & Davis, Brad H. & Gillespie, David R. & VanLaerhoven, Sherah L., 2009. "Incorporating behaviour into simple models of dispersal using the biological control agent Dicyphus hesperus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3271-3279.
    4. Marina E Wosniack & Marcos C Santos & Ernesto P Raposo & Gandhi M Viswanathan & Marcos G E da Luz, 2017. "The evolutionary origins of Lévy walk foraging," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Yang Qi & Pulin Gong, 2022. "Fractional neural sampling as a theory of spatiotemporal probabilistic computations in neural circuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Cody T Ross & Bruce Winterhalder, 2018. "Evidence for encounter-conditional, area-restricted search in a preliminary study of Colombian blowgun hunters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Pascual López-López & José Benavent-Corai & Clara García-Ripollés & Vicente Urios, 2013. "Scavengers on the Move: Behavioural Changes in Foraging Search Patterns during the Annual Cycle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    8. José Ignacio Santos & María Pereda & Débora Zurro & Myrian Álvarez & Jorge Caro & José Manuel Galán & Ivan Briz i Godino, 2015. "Effect of Resource Spatial Correlation and Hunter-Fisher-Gatherer Mobility on Social Cooperation in Tierra del Fuego," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    9. Pauline Formaglio & Marina E. Wosniack & Raphael M. Tromer & Jaderson G. Polli & Yuri B. Matos & Hang Zhong & Ernesto P. Raposo & Marcos G. E. Luz & Rogerio Amino, 2023. "Plasmodium sporozoite search strategy to locate hotspots of blood vessel invasion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Toru Nakamura & Toru Takumi & Atsuko Takano & Fumiyuki Hatanaka & Yoshiharu Yamamoto, 2013. "Characterization and Modeling of Intermittent Locomotor Dynamics in Clock Gene-Deficient Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, March.
    11. Sophie Lardy & Daniel Fortin & Olivier Pays, 2016. "Increased Exploration Capacity Promotes Group Fission in Gregarious Foraging Herbivores," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    12. LaScala-Gruenewald, Diana E. & Mehta, Rohan S. & Liu, Yu & Denny, Mark W., 2019. "Sensory perception plays a larger role in foraging efficiency than heavy-tailed movement strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 69-82.
    13. Toman, Kellan & Voulgarakis, Nikolaos K., 2022. "Stochastic pursuit-evasion curves for foraging dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 597(C).
    14. Parshad, Rana D. & Wickramsooriya, Sureni & Bailey, Susan, 2020. "A remark on “Biological control through provision of additional food to predators: A theoretical study†[Theor. Popul. Biol. 72 (2007) 111–120]," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 60-68.
    15. Cédric Sueur & Léa Briard & Odile Petit, 2011. "Individual Analyses of Lévy Walk in Semi-Free Ranging Tonkean Macaques (Macaca tonkeana)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.
    16. Qi, Jie & Rong, Zhihai, 2013. "The emergence of scaling laws search dynamics in a particle swarm optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(6), pages 1522-1531.
    17. Zhang, Jingjing & Dennis, Todd E. & Landers, Todd J. & Bell, Elizabeth & Perry, George L.W., 2017. "Linking individual-based and statistical inferential models in movement ecology: A case study with black petrels (Procellaria parkinsoni)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 425-436.
    18. Peter J M Van Haastert & Leonard Bosgraaf, 2009. "Food Searching Strategy of Amoeboid Cells by Starvation Induced Run Length Extension," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-7, August.
    19. Stefano Focardi & Paolo Montanaro & Elena Pecchioli, 2009. "Adaptive Lévy Walks in Foraging Fallow Deer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-6, August.
    20. Maria C. Mariani & William Kubin & Peter K. Asante & Osei K. Tweneboah & Maria P. Beccar-Varela & Sebastian Jaroszewicz & Hector Gonzalez-Huizar, 2020. "Self-Similar Models: Relationship between the Diffusion Entropy Analysis, Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and Lévy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.