IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parameter Identifiability and Sensitivity Analysis Predict Targets for Enhancement of STAT1 Activity in Pancreatic Cancer and Stellate Cells

Author

Listed:
  • Katja Rateitschak
  • Felix Winter
  • Falko Lange
  • Robert Jaster
  • Olaf Wolkenhauer

Abstract

The present work exemplifies how parameter identifiability analysis can be used to gain insights into differences in experimental systems and how uncertainty in parameter estimates can be handled. The case study, presented here, investigates interferon-gamma (IFNγ) induced STAT1 signalling in two cell types that play a key role in pancreatic cancer development: pancreatic stellate and cancer cells. IFNγ inhibits the growth for both types of cells and may be prototypic of agents that simultaneously hit cancer and stroma cells. We combined time-course experiments with mathematical modelling to focus on the common situation in which variations between profiles of experimental time series, from different cell types, are observed. To understand how biochemical reactions are causing the observed variations, we performed a parameter identifiability analysis. We successfully identified reactions that differ in pancreatic stellate cells and cancer cells, by comparing confidence intervals of parameter value estimates and the variability of model trajectories. Our analysis shows that useful information can also be obtained from nonidentifiable parameters. For the prediction of potential therapeutic targets we studied the consequences of uncertainty in the values of identifiable and nonidentifiable parameters. Interestingly, the sensitivity of model variables is robust against parameter variations and against differences between IFNγ induced STAT1 signalling in pancreatic stellate and cancer cells. This provides the basis for a prediction of therapeutic targets that are valid for both cell types. Author Summary: For the prediction of therapeutic targets and the design of therapies, it is important to study the same pathway across different cell types. This is particularly relevant for cancer research, where several cell types are involved in carcinogenesis. Pancreatic cancer is enhanced by activated pancreatic stellate cells. It would thus seem plausible for an effective therapy to hit stellate and cancer cells. The cytokine IFNγ is an inhibitor of proliferation in both cell types. Antiproliferative effects of IFNγ are mediated by STAT1 signalling. An important aspect is to determine those reactions that cause the differences in the initial increase of phosphorylated STAT1 and in the temporal profile of STAT1 nuclear accumulation between the two cell types. We examined this aspect by performing a parameter identifiability analysis for calibrated mathematical models. We calculated confidence intervals of the estimated parameter values and found that they provide insights into reactions underlying the differences. A key finding of sensitivity analysis elucidated that predicted targets for enhancement of STAT1 activity are robust against parameter uncertainty and moreover they are robust between the two cell types. Our case study therefore exemplified how identifiability and sensitivity analysis can provide a basis for the prediction of potential therapeutic targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Katja Rateitschak & Felix Winter & Falko Lange & Robert Jaster & Olaf Wolkenhauer, 2012. "Parameter Identifiability and Sensitivity Analysis Predict Targets for Enhancement of STAT1 Activity in Pancreatic Cancer and Stellate Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002815
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002815
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002815&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua F Apgar & Jared E Toettcher & Drew Endy & Forest M White & Bruce Tidor, 2008. "Stimulus Design for Model Selection and Validation in Cell Signaling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-10, February.
    2. D. J. Venzon & S. H. Moolgavkar, 1988. "A Method for Computing Profile‐Likelihood‐Based Confidence Intervals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 37(1), pages 87-94, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Baldow & Sebastian Salentin & Michael Schroeder & Ingo Roeder & Ingmar Glauche, 2017. "MAGPIE: Simplifying access and execution of computational models in the life sciences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federico Sevlever & Juan Pablo Di Bella & Alejandra C Ventura, 2020. "Discriminating between negative cooperativity and ligand binding to independent sites using pre-equilibrium properties of binding curves," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Samuel Bandara & Johannes P Schlöder & Roland Eils & Hans Georg Bock & Tobias Meyer, 2009. "Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation of a Cell Signaling Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Ben Weidmann & David J. Deming, 2020. "Team Players: How Social Skills Improve Group Performance," NBER Working Papers 27071, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Andrew White & Malachi Tolman & Howard D Thames & Hubert Rodney Withers & Kathy A Mason & Mark K Transtrum, 2016. "The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Ben Weidmann & David J. Deming, 2021. "Team Players: How Social Skills Improve Team Performance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(6), pages 2637-2657, November.
    6. Bianca Schmid & Melanie Rinas & Alessia Ruggieri & Eliana Gisela Acosta & Marie Bartenschlager & Antje Reuter & Wolfgang Fischl & Nathalie Harder & Jan-Philip Bergeest & Michael Flossdorf & Karl Rohr , 2015. "Live Cell Analysis and Mathematical Modeling Identify Determinants of Attenuation of Dengue Virus 2’-O-Methylation Mutant," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-36, December.
    7. Dankmar Böhning & Herwig Friedl, 2021. "Population size estimation based upon zero-truncated, one-inflated and sparse count data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1197-1217, October.
    8. Juliane Liepe & Sarah Filippi & Michał Komorowski & Michael P H Stumpf, 2013. "Maximizing the Information Content of Experiments in Systems Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Joshua Russell-Buckland & Christopher P Barnes & Ilias Tachtsidis, 2019. "A Bayesian framework for the analysis of systems biology models of the brain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, April.
    10. V. G. Vassiliadis & I. I. Spyroglou & A. G. Rigas & J. R. Rosenberg & K. A. Lindsay, 2019. "Dealing with the Phenomenon of Quasi-complete Separation and a Goodness of Fit Test in Logistic Regression Models in the Case of Long Data Sets," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(3), pages 567-596, December.
    11. Thembi Mdluli & Gregery T Buzzard & Ann E Rundell, 2015. "Efficient Optimization of Stimuli for Model-Based Design of Experiments to Resolve Dynamical Uncertainty," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Afnizanfaizal Abdullah & Safaai Deris & Sohail Anwar & Satya N V Arjunan, 2013. "An Evolutionary Firefly Algorithm for the Estimation of Nonlinear Biological Model Parameters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Laura Cella & Giuseppe Palma & Joseph O Deasy & Jung Hun Oh & Raffaele Liuzzi & Vittoria D’Avino & Manuel Conson & Novella Pugliese & Marco Picardi & Marco Salvatore & Roberto Pacelli, 2014. "Complication Probability Models for Radiation-Induced Heart Valvular Dysfunction: Do Heart-Lung Interactions Play a Role?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.
    14. Lam, Nicholas N. & Docherty, Paul D. & Murray, Rua, 2022. "Practical identifiability of parametrised models: A review of benefits and limitations of various approaches," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 202-216.
    15. Filippo Menolascina & Gianfranco Fiore & Emanuele Orabona & Luca De Stefano & Mike Ferry & Jeff Hasty & Mario di Bernardo & Diego di Bernardo, 2014. "In-Vivo Real-Time Control of Protein Expression from Endogenous and Synthetic Gene Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Fabian Fröhlich & Philipp Thomas & Atefeh Kazeroonian & Fabian J Theis & Ramon Grima & Jan Hasenauer, 2016. "Inference for Stochastic Chemical Kinetics Using Moment Equations and System Size Expansion," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-28, July.
    17. Mark K Transtrum & Peng Qiu, 2016. "Bridging Mechanistic and Phenomenological Models of Complex Biological Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-34, May.
    18. Jeffrey P Perley & Judith Mikolajczak & Marietta L Harrison & Gregery T Buzzard & Ann E Rundell, 2014. "Multiple Model-Informed Open-Loop Control of Uncertain Intracellular Signaling Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Casey Crump & Kenny Crump & Eric Hack & Rose Luippold & Kenneth Mundt & Elizabeth Liebig & Julie Panko & Dennis Paustenbach & Deborah Proctor, 2003. "Dose‐Response and Risk Assessment of Airborne Hexavalent Chromium and Lung Cancer Mortality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 1147-1163, December.
    20. Xiaowei Ren & Jielai Xia, 2019. "An algorithm for computing profile likelihood based pointwise confidence intervals for nonlinear dose-response models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.