IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Correspondence Between Solution-State Dynamics of an Individual Protein and the Sequence and Conformational Diversity of its Family

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory D Friedland
  • Nils-Alexander Lakomek
  • Christian Griesinger
  • Jens Meiler
  • Tanja Kortemme

Abstract

Conformational ensembles are increasingly recognized as a useful representation to describe fundamental relationships between protein structure, dynamics and function. Here we present an ensemble of ubiquitin in solution that is created by sampling conformational space without experimental information using “Backrub” motions inspired by alternative conformations observed in sub-Angstrom resolution crystal structures. Backrub-generated structures are then selected to produce an ensemble that optimizes agreement with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Residual Dipolar Couplings (RDCs). Using this ensemble, we probe two proposed relationships between properties of protein ensembles: (i) a link between native-state dynamics and the conformational heterogeneity observed in crystal structures, and (ii) a relation between dynamics of an individual protein and the conformational variability explored by its natural family. We show that the Backrub motional mechanism can simultaneously explore protein native-state dynamics measured by RDCs, encompass the conformational variability present in ubiquitin complex structures and facilitate sampling of conformational and sequence variability matching those occurring in the ubiquitin protein family. Our results thus support an overall relation between protein dynamics and conformational changes enabling sequence changes in evolution. More practically, the presented method can be applied to improve protein design predictions by accounting for intrinsic native-state dynamics.Author Summary: Knowledge of protein properties is essential for enhancing the understanding and engineering of biological functions. One key property of proteins is their flexibility—their intrinsic ability to adopt different conformations. This flexibility can be measured experimentally but the measurements are indirect and computational models are required to interpret them. Here we develop a new computational method for interpreting these measurements of flexibility and use it to create a model of flexibility of the protein ubiquitin. We apply our results to show relationships between the flexibility of one protein and the diversity of structures and amino acid sequences of the protein's evolutionary family. Thus, our results show that more accurate computational modeling of protein flexibility is useful for improving prediction of a broader range of amino acid sequences compatible with a given protein. Our method will be helpful for advancing methods to rationally engineer protein functions by enabling sampling of conformational and sequence diversity similar to that of a protein's evolutionary family.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory D Friedland & Nils-Alexander Lakomek & Christian Griesinger & Jens Meiler & Tanja Kortemme, 2009. "A Correspondence Between Solution-State Dynamics of an Individual Protein and the Sequence and Conformational Diversity of its Family," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000393
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000393
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000393&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine A. Henzler-Wildman & Vu Thai & Ming Lei & Maria Ott & Magnus Wolf-Watz & Tim Fenn & Ed Pozharski & Mark A. Wilson & Gregory A. Petsko & Martin Karplus & Christian G. Hübner & Dorothee Kern, 2007. "Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7171), pages 838-844, December.
    2. Elan Z. Eisenmesser & Oscar Millet & Wladimir Labeikovsky & Dmitry M. Korzhnev & Magnus Wolf-Watz & Daryl A. Bosco & Jack J. Skalicky & Lewis E. Kay & Dorothee Kern, 2005. "Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis," Nature, Nature, vol. 438(7064), pages 117-121, November.
    3. Qi Zhang & Andrew C. Stelzer & Charles K. Fisher & Hashim M. Al-Hashimi, 2007. "Visualizing spatially correlated dynamics that directs RNA conformational transitions," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7173), pages 1263-1267, December.
    4. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Robert B. Best & Mark A. DePristo & Christopher M. Dobson & Michele Vendruscolo, 2005. "Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7022), pages 128-132, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colin A Smith & Tanja Kortemme, 2011. "Predicting the Tolerated Sequences for Proteins and Protein Interfaces Using RosettaBackrub Flexible Backbone Design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Andrej Paluda & Adam J. Middleton & Claudia Rossig & Peter D. Mace & Catherine L. Day, 2022. "Ubiquitin and a charged loop regulate the ubiquitin E3 ligase activity of Ark2C," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Dong Long & Rafael Brüschweiler, 2011. "In Silico Elucidation of the Recognition Dynamics of Ubiquitin," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-9, April.
    4. Timothy R Lezon & Ivet Bahar, 2010. "Using Entropy Maximization to Understand the Determinants of Structural Dynamics beyond Native Contact Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy R Lezon & Ivet Bahar, 2010. "Using Entropy Maximization to Understand the Determinants of Structural Dynamics beyond Native Contact Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Santiago Esteban-Martín & Robert Bryn Fenwick & Jörgen Ådén & Benjamin Cossins & Carlos W Bertoncini & Victor Guallar & Magnus Wolf-Watz & Xavier Salvatella, 2014. "Correlated Inter-Domain Motions in Adenylate Kinase," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, July.
    3. Dong Long & Rafael Brüschweiler, 2011. "In Silico Elucidation of the Recognition Dynamics of Ubiquitin," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-9, April.
    4. Kai Wang & Shiyang Long & Pu Tian, 2015. "Hierarchical Conformational Analysis of Native Lysozyme Based on Sub-Millisecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Fabian Paul & Thomas R Weikl, 2016. "How to Distinguish Conformational Selection and Induced Fit Based on Chemical Relaxation Rates," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Nicolas Palopoli & Alexander Miguel Monzon & Gustavo Parisi & Maria Silvina Fornasari, 2016. "Addressing the Role of Conformational Diversity in Protein Structure Prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Dilek Eren & Burak Alakent, 2013. "Frequency Response of a Protein to Local Conformational Perturbations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Giacomo Janson & Gilberto Valdes-Garcia & Lim Heo & Michael Feig, 2023. "Direct generation of protein conformational ensembles via machine learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Robert Peach & Alexis Arnaudon & Mauricio Barahona, 2022. "Relative, local and global dimension in complex networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Ainan Geng & Laura Ganser & Rohit Roy & Honglue Shi & Supriya Pratihar & David A. Case & Hashim M. Al-Hashimi, 2023. "An RNA excited conformational state at atomic resolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Maciej Majewski & Adrià Pérez & Philipp Thölke & Stefan Doerr & Nicholas E. Charron & Toni Giorgino & Brooke E. Husic & Cecilia Clementi & Frank Noé & Gianni Fabritiis, 2023. "Machine learning coarse-grained potentials of protein thermodynamics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Sebastian L B König & Mélodie Hadzic & Erica Fiorini & Richard Börner & Danny Kowerko & Wolf U Blanckenhorn & Roland K O Sigel, 2013. "BOBA FRET: Bootstrap-Based Analysis of Single-Molecule FRET Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Matteo Tiberti & Elena Papaleo & Tone Bengtsen & Wouter Boomsma & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2015. "ENCORE: Software for Quantitative Ensemble Comparison," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Torgeir R Hvidsten & Astrid Lægreid & Andriy Kryshtafovych & Gunnar Andersson & Krzysztof Fidelis & Jan Komorowski, 2009. "A Comprehensive Analysis of the Structure-Function Relationship in Proteins Based on Local Structure Similarity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-9, July.
    15. Anders S Christensen & Troels E Linnet & Mikael Borg & Wouter Boomsma & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Thomas Hamelryck & Jan H Jensen, 2013. "Protein Structure Validation and Refinement Using Amide Proton Chemical Shifts Derived from Quantum Mechanics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    16. F. Emil Thomasen & Tórur Skaalum & Ashutosh Kumar & Sriraksha Srinivasan & Stefano Vanni & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2024. "Rescaling protein-protein interactions improves Martini 3 for flexible proteins in solution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Xiang Zhang & Jingjing Tang & Lingling Wang & Chuan Wang & Lei Chen & Xinqing Chen & Jieshu Qian & Bingcai Pan, 2024. "Nanoconfinement-triggered oligomerization pathway for efficient removal of phenolic pollutants via a Fenton-like reaction," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Douglas L Theobald & Deborah S Wuttke, 2008. "Accurate Structural Correlations from Maximum Likelihood Superpositions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8, February.
    19. Nimmi Das Anthuparambil & Anita Girelli & Sonja Timmermann & Marvin Kowalski & Mohammad Sayed Akhundzadeh & Sebastian Retzbach & Maximilian D. Senft & Michelle Dargasz & Dennis Gutmüller & Anusha Hire, 2023. "Exploring non-equilibrium processes and spatio-temporal scaling laws in heated egg yolk using coherent X-rays," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Diego F. Gauto & Pavel Macek & Duccio Malinverni & Hugo Fraga & Matteo Paloni & Iva Sučec & Audrey Hessel & Juan Pablo Bustamante & Alessandro Barducci & Paul Schanda, 2022. "Functional control of a 0.5 MDa TET aminopeptidase by a flexible loop revealed by MAS NMR," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.