IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context-Specific Metabolic Networks Are Consistent with Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Scott A Becker
  • Bernhard O Palsson

Abstract

Reconstructions of cellular metabolism are publicly available for a variety of different microorganisms and some mammalian genomes. To date, these reconstructions are “genome-scale” and strive to include all reactions implied by the genome annotation, as well as those with direct experimental evidence. Clearly, many of the reactions in a genome-scale reconstruction will not be active under particular conditions or in a particular cell type. Methods to tailor these comprehensive genome-scale reconstructions into context-specific networks will aid predictive in silico modeling for a particular situation. We present a method called Gene Inactivity Moderated by Metabolism and Expression (GIMME) to achieve this goal. The GIMME algorithm uses quantitative gene expression data and one or more presupposed metabolic objectives to produce the context-specific reconstruction that is most consistent with the available data. Furthermore, the algorithm provides a quantitative inconsistency score indicating how consistent a set of gene expression data is with a particular metabolic objective. We show that this algorithm produces results consistent with biological experiments and intuition for adaptive evolution of bacteria, rational design of metabolic engineering strains, and human skeletal muscle cells. This work represents progress towards producing constraint-based models of metabolism that are specific to the conditions where the expression profiling data is available.Author Summary: Systems biology aims to characterize cells and organisms as systems through the careful curation of all components. Large models that account for all known metabolism in microorganisms have been created by our group and by others around the world. Furthermore, models are available for human cells. These models represent all possible biochemical reactions in a cell, but cells choose which subset of reactions to use to suit their immediate purposes. We have developed a method to combine widely available gene expression data with presupposed cellular functions to predict the subset of reactions that a cell uses under particular conditions. We quantify the consistency of subsets of reactions with existing biological knowledge to demonstrate that the method produces biologically realistic subsets of reactions. This method is useful for determining the activity of metabolic reactions in Escherichia coli and will be essential for understanding human cellular metabolism.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott A Becker & Bernhard O Palsson, 2008. "Context-Specific Metabolic Networks Are Consistent with Experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000082
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000082
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000082&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus W. Covert & Eric M. Knight & Jennifer L. Reed & Markus J. Herrgard & Bernhard O. Palsson, 2004. "Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 429(6987), pages 92-96, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oveis Jamialahmadi & Sameereh Hashemi-Najafabadi & Ehsan Motamedian & Stefano Romeo & Fatemeh Bagheri, 2019. "A benchmark-driven approach to reconstruct metabolic networks for studying cancer metabolism," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Yuefan Huang & Vakul Mohanty & Merve Dede & Kyle Tsai & May Daher & Li Li & Katayoun Rezvani & Ken Chen, 2023. "Characterizing cancer metabolism from bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data using METAFlux," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Jacob J. Valenzuela & Selva Rupa Christinal Immanuel & James Wilson & Serdar Turkarslan & Maryann Ruiz & Sean M. Gibbons & Kristopher A. Hunt & Nejc Stopnisek & Manfred Auer & Marcin Zemla & David A. , 2024. "Origin of biogeographically distinct ecotypes during laboratory evolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Nadine Töpfer & Federico Scossa & Alisdair Fernie & Zoran Nikoloski, 2014. "Variability of Metabolite Levels Is Linked to Differential Metabolic Pathways in Arabidopsis's Responses to Abiotic Stresses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    5. André Schultz & Amina A Qutub, 2016. "Reconstruction of Tissue-Specific Metabolic Networks Using CORDA," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Sourav Chowdhury & Daniel C. Zielinski & Christopher Dalldorf & Joao V. Rodrigues & Bernhard O. Palsson & Eugene I. Shakhnovich, 2023. "Empowering drug off-target discovery with metabolic and structural analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Anne Richelle & Austin W T Chiang & Chih-Chung Kuo & Nathan E Lewis, 2019. "Increasing consensus of context-specific metabolic models by integrating data-inferred cell functions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan-Jun Kim & Nathan D Price, 2011. "Genetic Co-Occurrence Network across Sequenced Microbes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Cheemeng Tan & Robert Phillip Smith & Ming-Chi Tsai & Russell Schwartz & Lingchong You, 2014. "Phenotypic Signatures Arising from Unbalanced Bacterial Growth," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Joel A Paulson & Marc Martin-Casas & Ali Mesbah, 2019. "Fast uncertainty quantification for dynamic flux balance analysis using non-smooth polynomial chaos expansions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-35, August.
    4. Jeremiah J Faith & Boris Hayete & Joshua T Thaden & Ilaria Mogno & Jamey Wierzbowski & Guillaume Cottarel & Simon Kasif & James J Collins & Timothy S Gardner, 2007. "Large-Scale Mapping and Validation of Escherichia coli Transcriptional Regulation from a Compendium of Expression Profiles," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Eamon Duede & Victor Zhorin, 2016. "Convergence of Economic Growth and the Great Recession as Seen From a Celestial Observatory," Papers 1604.04312, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    6. Markus Maucher & David Kracht & Steffen Schober & Martin Bossert & Hans Kestler, 2014. "Inferring Boolean functions via higher-order correlations," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 97-115, February.
    7. Niels Klitgord & Daniel Segrè, 2010. "Environments that Induce Synthetic Microbial Ecosystems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Christian L Barrett & Bernhard O Palsson, 2006. "Iterative Reconstruction of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks: An Algorithmic Approach," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-10, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.