IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing consensus of context-specific metabolic models by integrating data-inferred cell functions

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Richelle
  • Austin W T Chiang
  • Chih-Chung Kuo
  • Nathan E Lewis

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models provide a valuable context for analyzing data from diverse high-throughput experimental techniques. Models can quantify the activities of diverse pathways and cellular functions. Since some metabolic reactions are only catalyzed in specific environments, several algorithms exist that build context-specific models. However, these methods make differing assumptions that influence the content and associated predictive capacity of resulting models, such that model content varies more due to methods used than cell types. Here we overcome this problem with a novel framework for inferring the metabolic functions of a cell before model construction. For this, we curated a list of metabolic tasks and developed a framework to infer the activity of these functionalities from transcriptomic data. We protected the data-inferred tasks during the implementation of diverse context-specific model extraction algorithms for 44 cancer cell lines. We show that the protection of data-inferred metabolic tasks decreases the variability of models across extraction methods. Furthermore, resulting models better capture the actual biological variability across cell lines. This study highlights the potential of using biological knowledge, inferred from omics data, to obtain a better consensus between existing extraction algorithms. It further provides guidelines for the development of the next-generation of data contextualization methods.Author summary: Genome-scale models of human metabolism have facilitated numerous exciting discoveries regarding human physiology and therapeutics. The accuracy of results from such studies requires that models capture the tissue or cell-type specific metabolism. In hopes to obtain accurate models, several algorithms have been developed to extract cell- or tissue-specific metabolic models. Each algorithm has provided useful insights into the metabolism of specific cell and tissue types. However, since each of these methods use different assumptions to guide reaction inclusion and removal, they result in considerable differences in size, functionality, accuracy, and ultimate biological interpretation, even when using the same data set. To overcome this, the enclosed research proposes an approach to infer the functionalities of a cell or tissue from omics data, and then protect these functions to guide the construction of a context-specific model. Through this study, we highlight the value of using experimental data to help infer the set of metabolic functions that should be included in a model, in an effort to obtain greater consensus across existing extraction algorithms. This study further provides guidelines for the development of the next-generation of data contextualization methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Richelle & Austin W T Chiang & Chih-Chung Kuo & Nathan E Lewis, 2019. "Increasing consensus of context-specific metabolic models by integrating data-inferred cell functions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006867
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006867
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006867&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edik M. Blais & Kristopher D. Rawls & Bonnie V. Dougherty & Zhuo I. Li & Glynis L. Kolling & Ping Ye & Anders Wallqvist & Jason A. Papin, 2017. "Reconciled rat and human metabolic networks for comparative toxicogenomics and biomarker predictions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Luis Tobalina & Jon Pey & Alberto Rezola & Francisco J Planes, 2016. "Assessment of FBA Based Gene Essentiality Analysis in Cancer with a Fast Context-Specific Network Reconstruction Method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Scott A Becker & Bernhard O Palsson, 2008. "Context-Specific Metabolic Networks Are Consistent with Experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Schultz & Amina A Qutub, 2016. "Reconstruction of Tissue-Specific Metabolic Networks Using CORDA," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, March.
    2. Sourav Chowdhury & Daniel C. Zielinski & Christopher Dalldorf & Joao V. Rodrigues & Bernhard O. Palsson & Eugene I. Shakhnovich, 2023. "Empowering drug off-target discovery with metabolic and structural analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Nadine Töpfer & Federico Scossa & Alisdair Fernie & Zoran Nikoloski, 2014. "Variability of Metabolite Levels Is Linked to Differential Metabolic Pathways in Arabidopsis's Responses to Abiotic Stresses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Yuefan Huang & Vakul Mohanty & Merve Dede & Kyle Tsai & May Daher & Li Li & Katayoun Rezvani & Ken Chen, 2023. "Characterizing cancer metabolism from bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data using METAFlux," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Domenic H. Cerri & Daniel L. Albaugh & Lindsay R. Walton & Brittany Katz & Tzu-Wen Wang & Tzu-Hao Harry Chao & Weiting Zhang & Randal J. Nonneman & Jing Jiang & Sung-Ho Lee & Amit Etkin & Catherine N., 2024. "Distinct neurochemical influences on fMRI response polarity in the striatum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Oveis Jamialahmadi & Sameereh Hashemi-Najafabadi & Ehsan Motamedian & Stefano Romeo & Fatemeh Bagheri, 2019. "A benchmark-driven approach to reconstruct metabolic networks for studying cancer metabolism," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Jacob J. Valenzuela & Selva Rupa Christinal Immanuel & James Wilson & Serdar Turkarslan & Maryann Ruiz & Sean M. Gibbons & Kristopher A. Hunt & Nejc Stopnisek & Manfred Auer & Marcin Zemla & David A. , 2024. "Origin of biogeographically distinct ecotypes during laboratory evolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.