IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0020095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Kaiser
  • Claus C Hilgetag

Abstract

It has been suggested that neural systems across several scales of organization show optimal component placement, in which any spatial rearrangement of the components would lead to an increase of total wiring. Using extensive connectivity datasets for diverse neural networks combined with spatial coordinates for network nodes, we applied an optimization algorithm to the network layouts, in order to search for wire-saving component rearrangements. We found that optimized component rearrangements could substantially reduce total wiring length in all tested neural networks. Specifically, total wiring among 95 primate (Macaque) cortical areas could be decreased by 32%, and wiring of neuronal networks in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans could be reduced by 48% on the global level, and by 49% for neurons within frontal ganglia. Wiring length reductions were possible due to the existence of long-distance projections in neural networks. We explored the role of these projections by comparing the original networks with minimally rewired networks of the same size, which possessed only the shortest possible connections. In the minimally rewired networks, the number of processing steps along the shortest paths between components was significantly increased compared to the original networks. Additional benchmark comparisons also indicated that neural networks are more similar to network layouts that minimize the length of processing paths, rather than wiring length. These findings suggest that neural systems are not exclusively optimized for minimal global wiring, but for a variety of factors including the minimization of processing steps.Synopsis: What constraints shape the organization and spatial layout of neural networks? One influential idea in theoretical neuroscience has been that the overall wiring of neural networks should be as short as possible. Wire-saving could be achieved, for instance, through an optimal spatial arrangement of the connected network components. The authors evaluated this concept of component placement optimization in two representative systems, the neuronal network of the Caenorhabditis elegans worm and the long-range cortical connections of the primate brain. Contrary to previous results, they found many network layouts with substantially shorter total wiring than that of the original biological networks. This nonoptimal component placement arose from the existence of long-distance connections in the networks. Such connections may come at a developmental and metabolic cost; however, as the analyses reported in this article show, they also help to reduce the number of signal processing steps across the networks. Therefore, the organization of neural networks is shaped by trade-offs from multiple constraints, among them total wiring length and the average number of processing steps.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Kaiser & Claus C Hilgetag, 2006. "Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020095
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claus C Hilgetag & Helen Barbas, 2006. "Role of Mechanical Factors in the Morphology of the Primate Cerebral Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Ahn, Yong-Yeol & Jeong, Hawoong & Kim, Beom Jun, 2006. "Wiring cost in the organization of a biological neuronal network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 531-537.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ashish Raj & Yu-hsien Chen, 2011. "The Wiring Economy Principle: Connectivity Determines Anatomy in the Human Brain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Türker, İlker, 2018. "Generating clustered scale-free networks using Poisson based localization of edges," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 497(C), pages 72-85.
    3. Alessandra Griffa & Mathieu Mach & Julien Dedelley & Daniel Gutierrez-Barragan & Alessandro Gozzi & Gilles Allali & Joanes Grandjean & Dimitri Ville & Enrico Amico, 2023. "Evidence for increased parallel information transmission in human brain networks compared to macaques and male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. David Samu & Anil K Seth & Thomas Nowotny, 2014. "Influence of Wiring Cost on the Large-Scale Architecture of Human Cortical Connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Guilherme Ramos & Sérgio Pequito, 2020. "Generating complex networks with time-to-control communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Laurienti, Paul J. & Joyce, Karen E. & Telesford, Qawi K. & Burdette, Jonathan H. & Hayasaka, Satoru, 2011. "Universal fractal scaling of self-organized networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(20), pages 3608-3613.
    7. Riccardo Muolo & Joseph D. O’Brien & Timoteo Carletti & Malbor Asllani, 2024. "Persistence of chimera states and the challenge for synchronization in real-world networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 97(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Michele Coscia, 2018. "Using arborescences to estimate hierarchicalness in directed complex networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Logan Harriger & Martijn P van den Heuvel & Olaf Sporns, 2012. "Rich Club Organization of Macaque Cerebral Cortex and Its Role in Network Communication," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Raghavendra Singh & Seema Nagar & Amit A Nanavati, 2015. "Analysing Local Sparseness in the Macaque Brain Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Duan, Dongli & Wu, Xixi & Bai, Xue & Yan, Qi & Lv, Changchun & Bian, Genqing, 2022. "Dimensionality reduction method of dynamic networks for evolutionary mechanism of neuronal systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 599(C).
    12. Xue Wen & Delong Zhang & Bishan Liang & Ruibin Zhang & Zengjian Wang & Junjing Wang & Ming Liu & Ruiwang Huang, 2015. "Reconfiguration of the Brain Functional Network Associated with Visual Task Demands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Frank Emmert-Streib, 2013. "Structural Properties and Complexity of a New Network Class: Collatz Step Graphs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Kim, Sang-Yoon & Lim, Woochang, 2015. "Effect of small-world connectivity on fast sparsely synchronized cortical rhythms," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 109-123.
    15. Julian M L Budd & Krisztina Kovács & Alex S Ferecskó & Péter Buzás & Ulf T Eysel & Zoltán F Kisvárday, 2010. "Neocortical Axon Arbors Trade-off Material and Conduction Delay Conservation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Michael Capalbo & Eric Postma & Rainer Goebel, 2008. "Combining Structural Connectivity and Response Latencies to Model the Structure of the Visual System," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Badhwar, Rahul & Bagler, Ganesh, 2017. "A distance constrained synaptic plasticity model of C. elegans neuronal network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 313-322.
    2. Antoine Allard & M Ángeles Serrano, 2020. "Navigable maps of structural brain networks across species," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Kara E. Garcia & Xiaojie Wang & Christopher D. Kroenke, 2021. "A model of tension-induced fiber growth predicts white matter organization during brain folding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. David Samu & Anil K Seth & Thomas Nowotny, 2014. "Influence of Wiring Cost on the Large-Scale Architecture of Human Cortical Connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Yuhan Chen & Shengjun Wang & Claus C Hilgetag & Changsong Zhou, 2017. "Features of spatial and functional segregation and integration of the primate connectome revealed by trade-off between wiring cost and efficiency," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-37, September.
    6. Julian M L Budd & Krisztina Kovács & Alex S Ferecskó & Péter Buzás & Ulf T Eysel & Zoltán F Kisvárday, 2010. "Neocortical Axon Arbors Trade-off Material and Conduction Delay Conservation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-25, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.