IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v9y2022i1d10.1057_s41599-022-01383-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconstructing makerspaces in China: mass innovation space and the transformative creative industries

Author

Listed:
  • Pengfei Fu

    (Tongji University)

  • Lin Li

    (Tongji University)

  • Xuefang Xie

    (Tongji University)

Abstract

In recent years, the makerspaces and so-called “mass innovation spaces” (MISs) in China have been under heavy scholarly investigation. However, despite the proliferation of MISs and growing interest in understanding this phenomenon, the definition of MIS has also been a concern in this field. Meanwhile, there has also been a tendency to link these reconstructed MISs with the development agenda of the local creative industries. What is an MIS, and how is it similar and different from the general understanding of makerspaces in the context of China? What can we learn from China’s adoption and appropriation of MISs in relation to the transformation of creative industries? To answer these questions, we conducted a semantic network analysis of the mission statements from 305 Chinese MISs. The results show that the Chinese MIS is quite different from the makerspace in terms of space, activities, values, philosophy, community, and organization. By examining the reconstructed MISs, this article provides some examples of how the Western, Californian ideology-centered concept of “makerspace” is repurposed as a new site with many alternative imaginaries that are interwoven with what we term “Shenzhen ideology”—a mix of socialism and technological determinism and a fusion of social conservatism and economic progressivism.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengfei Fu & Lin Li & Xuefang Xie, 2022. "Reconstructing makerspaces in China: mass innovation space and the transformative creative industries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01383-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01383-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-022-01383-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-022-01383-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Michael R. & Hall, Joshua C., 2015. "Hackerspaces: a case study in the creation and management of a common pool resource," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 769-781, December.
    2. Dale Dougherty, 2012. "The Maker Movement," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 7(3), pages 11-14, July.
    3. Michael Stacey, 2014. "The FAB LAB Network: A Global Platform for Digital Invention, Education and Entrepreneurship," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 9(1-2), pages 221-238, Winter-Sp.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Youjia Li & Yi Li & Shunli Qiu, 2023. "Analysis on the Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Public Policies to Promote Innovation of High-Tech Startups in Makerspaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Baocui Min & Faizan Alam & Wei Zhao & Jinhong Tao, 2024. "Crafting a framework: a Delphi method approach to formulating a maker literacy assessment model for primary school students in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fritzsche, Albrecht, 2020. "Making without fabrication: Do-it-yourself activities for IT security in an open lab," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Jennifer Johns & Sarah Marie Hall, 2020. "‘I have so little time […] I got shit I need to do’: Critical perspectives on making and sharing in Manchester’s FabLab," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1292-1312, October.
    3. Langley, David J. & Zirngiebl, Marthe & Sbeih, Janosch & Devoldere, Bart, 2017. "Trajectories to reconcile sharing and commercialization in the maker movement," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 783-794.
    4. Laurent Dupont & Alex Gabriel & Mauricio Camargo & Claudine Guidat, 2017. "Collaborative Innovation Projects Engaging open communities: a Case Study on Emerging Challenges," Post-Print hal-01582548, HAL.
    5. Stefania Fiorentino, 2019. "The Maker Faire of Rome as a window of observation on the new perspectives for local economic development and the new urban entrepreneurial ecosystems," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(4), pages 364-381, June.
    6. Rayna, Thierry & Striukova, Ludmila, 2021. "Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Welter, Friederike & May-Strobl, Eva & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen & Günterberg, Brigitte, 2014. "Mittelstand im Wandel," IfM-Materialien 232, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    8. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, December.
    9. Darcy W.E. Allen, 2019. "Governing the entrepreneurial discovery of blockchain applications," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 194-212, October.
    10. Tabarés, Raúl & Kuittinen, Hanna, 2020. "A tale of two innovation cultures: Bridging the gap between makers and manufacturers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Marc Doussard & Greg Schrock & Laura Wolf-Powers & Max Eisenburger & Stephen Marotta, 2018. "Manufacturing without the firm: Challenges for the maker movement in three U.S. cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(3), pages 651-670, May.
    12. Claire Dorville & Sylvaine Lemeilleur, 2023. "Institutional change in community-based management for organic labeling: a case study from a Participatory Guarantee System in France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 377-404, December.
    13. Eric Joseph van Holm, 2021. "Making Entrepreneurs? Makerspaces and Entrepreneurial Intent Among High School Students," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 30(2), pages 249-266, September.
    14. Ostertag, Katrin & Bodenheimer, Miriam & Neuhäusler, Peter & Helmich, Patricia & Walz, Rainer, 2018. "Organisational innovations, social innovations and societal acceptability in the context of sustainability," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 8-2018, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    15. Browder, Russell E. & Aldrich, Howard E. & Bradley, Steven W., 2019. "The emergence of the maker movement: Implications for entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 459-476.
    16. Thierry Rayna & Ludmila Striukova, 2021. "Fostering skills for the 21st century [Favoriser les compétences pour le 21e siècle]," Post-Print hal-04096183, HAL.
    17. Cuntz, Alexander & Peuckert, Jan, 2023. "From hackers to start-ups: Innovation commons and local entrepreneurial activity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    18. María-Elena García-Ruiz & Francisco-Javier Lena-Acebo & Rocío Rocha Blanco, 2023. "Early Stages of the Fablab Movement: A New Path for an Open Innovation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Gantert, Till M. & Fredrich, Viktor & Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Kraus, Sascha, 2022. "The moral foundations of makerspaces as unconventional sources of innovation: A study of narratives and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1564-1574.
    20. Yafei Shi & Qi Cheng & Yantao Wei & Yunzhen Liang, 2023. "Linking Making and Creating: The Role of Emotional and Cognitive Engagement in Maker Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01383-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.