IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11018-d1193775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking Making and Creating: The Role of Emotional and Cognitive Engagement in Maker Education

Author

Listed:
  • Yafei Shi

    (Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China)

  • Qi Cheng

    (Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China)

  • Yantao Wei

    (Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yunzhen Liang

    (Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China)

Abstract

Learning through making enhances the learning experience and effectively develops learners’ creativity. In this regard, maker education has been extensively incorporated into school education as a vital learning environment. However, less is known about how making advances students’ creativity in maker education. Therefore, this study aimed to explore relationships among making, tinkering, and creating. A total of 372 middle school students enrolled in maker courses through the 2021–2022 school year were surveyed. They completed a questionnaire concerning learning engagement, individual creativity, collective creativity, and learning motivation. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to test the hypotheses proposed in this study. The results revealed significant relationships among learning engagement, individual creativity, and collective creativity. Specifically, behavioral engagement positively predicted emotional and cognitive engagement. Moreover, both emotional and cognitive engagement positively related to collective creativity, while only the effect of cognitive engagement on individual creativity was observed. The direct effects of behavioral engagement on individual and collective creativity were not significant. Furthermore, emotional and cognitive engagement mediated the association between behavioral engagement and collective creativity, while only cognitive engagement played a mediating role between behavioral engagement and individual creativity. In addition, the moderating analysis showed that learning motivation moderated the association between behavioral engagement and emotional engagement in school-maker education. Some implications for integrating maker education into school education and cultivating students’ creativity were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yafei Shi & Qi Cheng & Yantao Wei & Yunzhen Liang, 2023. "Linking Making and Creating: The Role of Emotional and Cognitive Engagement in Maker Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11018-:d:1193775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11018/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11018/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dale Dougherty, 2012. "The Maker Movement," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 7(3), pages 11-14, July.
    2. Holbrook, Morris B. & Gardner, Meryl P., 1998. "How Motivation Moderates the Effects of Emotions on the Duration of Consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 241-252, July.
    3. Stella Timotheou & Andri Ioannou, 2021. "Collective creativity in STEAM Making activities," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(2), pages 130-138, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Troxler, Peter & Wolf, Patricia, 2017. "Digital maker-entrepreneurs in open design: What activities make up their business model?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 807-817.
    2. Vladimiras Dolgopolovas & Valentina Dagiene, 2022. "On Semiotics Perspectives of Computational Thinking: Unravelling the “Pamphlet” Approach, a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Greg Schrock & Marc Doussard & Laura Wolf-Powers & Stephen Marotta & Max Eisenburger, 2019. "Appetite for Growth: Challenges to Scale for Food and Beverage Makers in Three U.S. Cities," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(1), pages 39-50, February.
    4. Steve Marotta, 2021. "Making sense of ‘maker’: Work, identity, and affect in the maker movement," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 638-654, June.
    5. Langley, David J. & Zirngiebl, Marthe & Sbeih, Janosch & Devoldere, Bart, 2017. "Trajectories to reconcile sharing and commercialization in the maker movement," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 783-794.
    6. J. M. Pearce, 2016. "Return on investment for open source scientific hardware development," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 192-195.
    7. Laurent Dupont & Alex Gabriel & Mauricio Camargo & Claudine Guidat, 2017. "Collaborative Innovation Projects Engaging open communities: a Case Study on Emerging Challenges," Post-Print hal-01582548, HAL.
    8. Yingqiu Wu & Zhonghong Ma, 2022. "The Power of Makerspaces: Heterotopia and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Stefania Fiorentino, 2019. "The Maker Faire of Rome as a window of observation on the new perspectives for local economic development and the new urban entrepreneurial ecosystems," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(4), pages 364-381, June.
    10. Welter, Friederike & May-Strobl, Eva & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen & Günterberg, Brigitte, 2014. "Mittelstand im Wandel," IfM-Materialien 232, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    11. Babin, Barry J. & Babin, Laurie, 2001. "Seeking something different? A model of schema typicality, consumer affect, purchase intentions and perceived shopping value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 89-96, November.
    12. Davis, Robert & Smith, Sandra D. & Lang, Bodo U., 2017. "A comparison of online and offline gender and goal directed shopping online," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 118-125.
    13. Hamalainen, Markko & Karjalainen, Jesse, 2017. "Social manufacturing: When the maker movement meets interfirm production networks," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 795-805.
    14. Kolja Oswald & Xiaokang Zhao, 2021. "Collaborative Learning in Makerspaces: A Grounded Theory of the Role of Collaborative Learning in Makerspaces," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    15. Tabarés, Raúl & Kuittinen, Hanna, 2020. "A tale of two innovation cultures: Bridging the gap between makers and manufacturers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Hansen, Jared M. & Levin, Michael A., 2016. "The effect of apathetic motivation on employees' intentions to use social media for businesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6058-6066.
    17. Andreea Gorbatai & Cyrus Dioun & Kisha Lashley, 2021. "Making Space for Emotions: Empathy, Contagion, and Legitimacy’s Double-Edged Sword," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 42-63, January.
    18. Ying Chen & Can Wu, 2017. "The hot spot transformation in the research evolution of maker," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1307-1324, December.
    19. Fritzsche, Albrecht, 2020. "Making without fabrication: Do-it-yourself activities for IT security in an open lab," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Marc Doussard & Greg Schrock & Laura Wolf-Powers & Max Eisenburger & Stephen Marotta, 2018. "Manufacturing without the firm: Challenges for the maker movement in three U.S. cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(3), pages 651-670, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11018-:d:1193775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.