IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-04224-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating the shift: understanding public trust in authorities amidst policy shifts in China’s COVID-19 response

Author

Listed:
  • Mengjun Zhang

    (School of Health Management and Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University (SMU))

  • Bei Liu

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Guochun Xiang

    (Southern Medical University)

  • Xuqiang Yan

    (Zhejiang Gongshang University)

  • Yuting Ling

    (Hangzhou Dianzi University Information Engineering College)

  • Chao Zuo

    (Zhejiang Gongshang University)

Abstract

China’s strict “dynamic zero-COVID” policy resulted in low infection and mortality rates due to public cooperation and top-down authority involvement. However, the abrupt abandonment of this policy on December 7, 2022, led to a surge in infections, strained medical resources, and decreased trust in the top-down authorities. This study aims to investigate the shift from pandemic fatigue to cognitive dissonance and its impact on public trust in top-down authorities post-policy change. Conducted in mainland China from March 8 to March 23, 2023, the study used an online snowball sampling method to collect 1626 questionnaires. The research examined changes in pandemic fatigue, cognitive dissonance, and trust in top-down authorities before and after the “dynamic zero-COVID” policy. Additionally, interviews provided deeper insights into public psychological states and behaviors. Linear regression models analyzed the relationship between pandemic fatigue, cognitive dissonance, and trust. Findings revealed a negative correlation between pandemic fatigue, cognitive dissonance, and trust in top-down authorities. Pandemic fatigue decreased trust in the central government (−0.04, 95% CI: −0.09, −0.06), local governments (−0.03, 95% CI: −0.07, −0.05), health authorities (−0.03, 95% CI: −0.07, −0.05), experts (−0.03, 95% CI: −0.07, −0.05), healthcare workers (−0.03, 95% CI: −0.07, −0.05), and medical resources (−0.03, 95% CI: −0.07, −0.05). Cognitive dissonance further exacerbated this decline in trust. Panic buying, misinformation, personal fear, and social fear negatively impacted trust, while social support had a positive impact on trust. China’s abrupt abandonment of the “dynamic zero-COVID” policy led to significant changes in public psychological states, impacting trust in top-down authorities. Authorities should consider public psychological states when formulating policies and take measures to mitigate the negative effects of pandemic fatigue and cognitive dissonance. Furthermore, strengthening social support and ensuring policy transparency and effectiveness are crucial to maintaining public trust in the government.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengjun Zhang & Bei Liu & Guochun Xiang & Xuqiang Yan & Yuting Ling & Chao Zuo, 2024. "Navigating the shift: understanding public trust in authorities amidst policy shifts in China’s COVID-19 response," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04224-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04224-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04224-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-04224-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Oost, Pascaline & Yzerbyt, Vincent & Schmitz, Mathias & Vansteenkiste, Maarten & Luminet, Olivier & Morbée, Sofie & Van den Bergh, Omer & Waterschoot, Joachim & Klein, Olivier, 2022. "The relation between conspiracism, government trust, and COVID-19 vaccination intentions: The key role of motivation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    2. Patrick Sturgis & Ian Brunton-Smith & Jonathan Jackson, 2021. "Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 1528-1534, November.
    3. Sonia Mukhtar, 2020. "Psychological health during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic outbreak," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(5), pages 512-516, August.
    4. Wu, Jian & Shen, Zhanlei & Li, Quanman & Tarimo, Clifford Silver & Wang, Meiyun & Gu, Jianqin & Wei, Wei & Zhang, Xinyu & Huang, Yanli & Ma, Mingze & Xu, Dongyang & Ojangba, Theodora & Miao, Yudong, 2023. "How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    5. Ben Davies & Fanny Lalot & Linus Peitz & Maria S. Heering & Hilal Ozkececi & Jacinta Babaian & Kaya Davies Hayon & Jo Broadwood & Dominic Abrams, 2021. "Changes in political trust in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: integrated public opinion evidence and implications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholls, Nicky & Pleace, Michelle & Yitbarek, Eleni, 2024. "Trust in government, social media and willingness to vaccinate," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    2. Seungwoo Han, 2024. "Trust and needles: how perceptions of inequality shape vaccination in South Korea," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Monica Martinez-Bravo & Carlos Sanz, 2022. "The Management of the Pandemic and its Effects on Trust and Accountability," Working Papers wp2022_2207, CEMFI.
    4. Daryna Grechyna, 2024. "Elections and policies: Evidence from the Covid pandemic," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3), pages 812-831, August.
    5. Narae Kim & Jeong-Nam Kim, 2024. "A COVID-19 Paradox of Communication, Ignorance, and Vaccination Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    6. Sukayna Younger-Khan & Nils B. Weidmann & Lisa Oswald, 2024. "Consistent effects of science and scientist characteristics on public trust across political regimes," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Xinyue Wen & Ismaël Rafaï & Sébastien Duchêne & Marc Willinger, 2022. "Did Mindful People Do Better during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Mindfulness Is Associated with Well-Being and Compliance with Prophylactic Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Marco Clari & Alessandro Godono & Beatrice Albanesi & Elena Casabona & Rosanna Irene Comoretto & Ihab Mansour & Alessio Conti & Valerio Dimonte & Catalina Ciocan, 2022. "Choosing between Homologous or Heterologous COVID-19 Vaccination Regimens: A Cross-Sectional Study among the General Population in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-9, March.
    9. Niels G. Mede, 2022. "Legacy media as inhibitors and drivers of public reservations against science: global survey evidence on the link between media use and anti-science attitudes," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Henry Cadena-Povea & Marco Hernández-Martínez & Gabriela Bastidas-Amador & Josué Calderón-Muñoz, 2025. "Perceived Stress: Psychosocial-Sociodemographic Factors as Predictors of Tension, Irritability, and Fatigue Among Ecuadorian University Professors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Angerer, Silvia & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Lergetporer, Philipp & Rittmannsberger, Thomas, 2023. "How does the vaccine approval procedure affect COVID-19 vaccination intentions?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Kritika Poudel & Pramod Subedi, 2020. "Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on socioeconomic and mental health aspects in Nepal," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(8), pages 748-755, December.
    13. Seng-Su Tsang & Zhih-Lin Liu & Thi Vinh Tran Nguyen, 2023. "Family–work conflict and work-from-home productivity: do work engagement and self-efficacy mediate?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Obdulia Torres González & Libia Santos-Requejo, 2024. "The Impact of Knowledge and Trust on COVID-19 Vaccination Intention: Analysis of a Population Group with Low Incentives to Vaccinate in Spain," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    15. Vidmantė Giedraitytė & Rasa Smaliukienė & Tomas Vedlūga, 2022. "The Impact of Citizen Participation on Public Sentiments during Crises: Comparative Study of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    16. C. Michael Hall & Peter Fieger & Girish Prayag & David Dyason, 2021. "Panic Buying and Consumption Displacement during COVID-19: Evidence from New Zealand," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Kanu Priya Mohan & Narisara Peungposop & Pranav Kalra, 2023. "Psychosocial Influences on Coping and Wellbeing during the Covid-19 Lockdown in the Early Days of the Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Research," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 163-193, February.
    18. Hisashi Eguchi & Akiomi Inoue & Ayako Hino & Mayumi Tsuji & Seiichiro Tateishi & Kazunori Ikegami & Tomohisa Nagata & Ryutaro Matsugaki & Yoshihisa Fujino & on behalf of the CORoNaWork Project, 2022. "Effect of Working from Home on the Association between Job Demands and Psychological Distress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-11, May.
    19. Željko Pavić & Emma KovaÄ ević & Adrijana Å uljok & Juraj Jurlina & Maja MiÅ¡kulin & Aida Mujkić & Ivan MiÅ¡kulin, 2023. "The Deficit and Contextual Models of Vaccine Hesitancy: A Test of the Mediation Paths," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    20. Ngo, Vu M. & Zimmermann, Klaus F. & Nguyen, Phuc V. & Huynh, Toan L.D. & Nguyen, Huan H., 2021. "How education and GDP drive the COVID-19 vaccination campaign," GLO Discussion Paper Series 986, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04224-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.