IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-04005-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do psychological costs matter? The mechanism of perceived value on green consumption behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Changpeng Shao

    (Shanghai Dianji University)

  • Sen Lin

    (University of Exeter)

Abstract

Green consumption is critical for achieving sustainable development goals. Many studies have focused on explaining why customers choose green consumption, but rarely have scholars considered the significant impacts of the psychological costs. This study conducted an online survey of 677 sampled individuals in China. A structural equation model (SEM) was adopted to explore how three types of psychological costs (i.e., stress, stigma, and autonomy) moderate the indirect relationships of perceived hedonic value and perceived utilitarian value with green consumption (i.e., green purchasing, recycling, and refusing to use disposable products) through the willingness to pay a green premium (WPGP). The results show that perceived values can promote green consumption behaviours by increasing WPGP. In addition, the indirect benefit of perceived hedonic value was shown to be stronger than that of perceived utilitarian value. However, the direct association of perceived hedonic value with green consumption was shown to be weaker (compared to perceived utilitarian value) when the influence of WPGP was excluded. Moreover, the indirect associations of perceived hedonic value with green consumption were stronger among individuals with high stress than those with low stress. In contrast, the indirect associations of perceived utilitarian value on green consumption were weaker for people with high stigma than those with low stigma. However, no evidence was found to show that autonomy can moderate the indirect relationships. These findings emphasize the different mechanisms of perceived hedonic value and perceived utilitarian value on green consumption, as well as the moderating role of psychological costs in understanding the relationship between perceived value and green consumption. Accordingly, this study suggests that policymakers should highlight the hedonic value rather than the utilitarian when encouraging a green lifestyle that involves a green premium. This is particularly true of situations with a high level of customers’ psychological costs. However, if there is no way to further increase people’s WPGP, then promoting the utilitarian value should be used to promote green consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Changpeng Shao & Sen Lin, 2024. "Do psychological costs matter? The mechanism of perceived value on green consumption behaviour," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04005-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04005-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04005-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-04005-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heesup Han, 2020. "Theory of green purchase behavior (TGPB): A new theory for sustainable consumption of green hotel and green restaurant products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2815-2828, September.
    2. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    3. Yadav, Rambalak & Pathak, Govind S., 2017. "Determinants of Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 114-122.
    4. Ki-Hoon Lee & Minwoo Lee & Nuwan Gunarathne, 2019. "Do green awards and certifications matter? Consumers’ perceptions, green behavioral intentions, and economic implications for the hotel industry: A Sri Lankan perspective," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(4), pages 593-612, June.
    5. Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Quy Van Khuc & Viet-Phuong La & Tam-Tri Le & Quang-Loc Nguyen & Ruining Jin & Phuong-Tri Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2022. "Mindsponge-Based Reasoning of Households’ Financial Resilience during the COVID-19 Crisis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Guanfei Zhang & Mei Li & Jin Li & Min Tan & Huie Li & Yiping Zhong, 2022. "Green Product Types Modulate Green Consumption in the Gain and Loss Framings: An Event-Related Potential Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Alvino, Letizia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Other publications TiSEM ed6b6a75-2a9f-4b6e-8076-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Tao Zhang, 2022. "Measuring following behaviour in gift giving by utility function: statistical model and empirical evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Franky Varah & Mirinchonme Mahongnao & Balaram Pani & Sophayo Khamrang, 2021. "Exploring young consumers’ intention toward green products: applying an extended theory of planned behavior," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9181-9195, June.
    10. Danish Mehraj & Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi, 2022. "Does green brand positioning translate into green purchase intention?: A mediation–moderation model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3166-3181, November.
    11. Micael-Lee Johnstone & Lay Tan, 2015. "Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 311-328, December.
    12. Anxin Xu & Chenwen Wei & Manhua Zheng & Lili Sun & Decong Tang, 2022. "Influence of Perceived Value on Repurchase Intention of Green Agricultural Products: From the Perspective of Multi-Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Bingsheng Liu & Siqi He & Sen Lin & Jinfeng Zhang & Bin Xue, 2023. "How usability of policy transparency promotes citizen compliance: evidence from a survey experiment," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 473-497, October.
    14. Syed Shah Alam & Cheng-Kun Wang & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Ismail Ahmad & Chieh-Yu Lin & Yi-Hui Ho, 2023. "Buying Behaviour towards Eco-Labelled Food Products: Mediation Moderation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Carlos Andres Trujillo & Catalina Estrada-Mejia & Jose A Rosa, 2021. "Norm-focused nudges influence pro-environmental choices and moderate post-choice emotional responses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    17. Qiang Wei & Dong Lv & Yixin Lin & Dongmei Zhu & Siyuan Liu & Yuting Liu, 2023. "Influence of Utilitarian and Hedonic Attributes on Willingness to Pay Green Product Premiums and Neural Mechanisms in China: An ERP Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Siqi Dai & Kai Chen & Rui Jin, 2022. "The effect of message framing and language intensity on green consumption behavior willingness," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2432-2452, February.
    19. Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Thomas E. Jones, 2022. "Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvino, Letizia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Other publications TiSEM ed6b6a75-2a9f-4b6e-8076-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Alvino, Letizia & Fraccascia, Luca, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    4. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Prarawan Senachai & Puthipong Julagasigorn, 2024. "Retail mix instruments influencing customer perceived value and customer engagement: a conceptual framework and research agenda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Quang-Loc Nguyen & Ruining Jin & Minh-Hieu Thi Nguyen & Thi-Phuong Nguyen & Viet-Phuong La & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2023. "Increasing Supply for Woody-Biomass-Based Energy through Wasted Resources: Insights from US Private Landowners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Davis, Lizhu & Hodges, Nancy, 2012. "Consumer shopping value: An investigation of shopping trip value, in-store shopping value and retail format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 229-239.
    8. Muthaffar, Aisha & Vilches-Montero, Sonia, 2023. "Empowering retailers: A bounded rationality perspective to enhancing omnichannel journey satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Pierre Volle & Ahmed Anis Charfi, 2011. "Valeur perçue et comportements en ligne en état d'immersion : le rôle modérateur de l'implication et de l'expertise," Post-Print halshs-00638649, HAL.
    10. Pedro Cuesta-Valiño & Pablo Gutiérrez Rodríguez & Estela Núñez-Barriopedro, 2020. "Perception of Advertisements for Healthy Food on Social Media: Effect of Attitude on Consumers’ Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Ana Isabel Polo Peña & Dolores María Frías Jamilena & Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Molina, 2017. "The effects of perceived value on loyalty: the moderating effect of market orientation adoption," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(1), pages 93-116, March.
    12. Yingxiu Hong & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Qing Yang, 2024. "Sustainable consumption practices among Chinese youth," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Mimouni-Chaabane, Aîda & Volle, Pierre, 2010. "Perceived benefits of loyalty programs: Scale development and implications for relational strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 32-37, January.
    14. Farzana Riva & Solon Magrizos & Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel & Ioannis Rizomyliotis, 2022. "Green consumerism, green perceived value, and restaurant revisit intention: Millennials' sustainable consumption with moderating effect of green perceived quality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2807-2819, November.
    15. Taneja, Shilpa & Ali, Liaqat, 2021. "Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Jin, Ruining & Hoang, Giang & Nguyen, Thi-Phuong & Tri, Nguyen Phuong & Le, Tam-Tri & La, Viet-Phuong, 2022. "An analytical framework-based pedagogical method for scholarly community coaching: A proof of concept," OSF Preprints qabhj_v1, Center for Open Science.
    17. Susan Geertshuis & Otto Krickl, 2013. "Value Judgements and Continuing Education," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 2(1), pages 123-141.
    18. Fidan Kurtaliqi & Caroline Lancelot Miltgen & Gaelle Pantin-Sohier, 2019. "The perceived value of mobile apps that assist in-store purchasing: A hybrid cost-benefit approach [Valeur perçue des applications mobiles d’aide à l’achat en magasin : une approche hybride par les," Post-Print hal-03556282, HAL.
    19. Stephanie Schwipper & Severine Peche & Gertrud Schmitz, 2020. "Mobile Location-Based Services’ Value-in-Use in Inner Cities: Do a Customer’s Shopping Patterns, Prior User Experience, and Sales Promotions Matter?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 511-564, October.
    20. Hye Jung Jung & HaeJung Kim & Kyung Wha Oh, 2016. "Green Leather for Ethical Consumers in China and Korea: Facilitating Ethical Consumption with Value–Belief–Attitude Logic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 483-502, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04005-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.