IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-02776-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the intention to consume and willingness to pay premium price for 3D-printed food in an emerging economy

Author

Listed:
  • Marvello Yang

    (Institute of Technology and Business Sabda Setia)

  • Jingzu Gao

    (UKM—Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM)

  • Qing Yang

    (UKM—Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM)

  • Abdullah Al Mamun

    (UKM—Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM)

  • Mohammad Masukujjaman

    (Faculty of Business Management and Professional Studies, Management and Science University)

  • Mohammad Enamul Hoque

    (BRAC University)

Abstract

This study examined the factors influencing customers’ consumption intentions and willingness to pay a premium price for 3D-printed food by combining personal innovativeness, perceived compatibility, perceived product value, desire to eat, and willingness to pay a premium price for 3D-printed food into a conceptual framework. Applying the extended theory of planned behavior (TPB) framework with personal innovativeness, perceived compatibility, and perceived product value, this study obtained data from 1540 respondents using an online cross-sectional questionnaire and utilized partial least squares structural equation modeling to verify the study hypotheses. The findings revealed that personal inventiveness, attitude, perceived compatibility, subjective norms, perceived product value, and perceived behavioral control exert a significant influence on the intention and willingness to pay a premium price for 3D-printed food. The result also showed that perceived behavior and intention significantly affect willingness to pay a premium price for 3D-printed food. Furthermore, the outcome confirmed that, with the exception of the link between perceived product value, subjective norms, and willingness to pay a premium price for 3D-printed food, intention serves as a significant mediator in the relationship between factors and willingness to pay a premium price for 3D-printed food. This research contributes to the theoretical understanding of the factors that influence consumers’ intention to consume and willingness to pay a premium for 3D-printed food, providing new insights from new variables and broadening the scope of the TPB’s original model in the perspective of new food settings and Asian nations. These findings imply that 3D-printed food sellers in the Asian market need to pay more attention to the factors that stimulate customers’ intentions, which, in turn, affect consumers’ views of perceived product value and improve their readiness to pay a premium price for 3D-printed food.

Suggested Citation

  • Marvello Yang & Jingzu Gao & Qing Yang & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Mohammad Enamul Hoque, 2024. "Modeling the intention to consume and willingness to pay premium price for 3D-printed food in an emerging economy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-02776-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02776-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-02776-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-02776-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    2. Singh, Nidhi & Sinha, Neena, 2020. "How perceived trust mediates merchant's intention to use a mobile wallet technology," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Md. Kamrul Hasan & Ahmed Rageh Ismail & MD. Faridul Islam, 2017. "Tourist risk perceptions and revisit intention: A critical review of literature," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1412874-141, January.
    4. Kumar Shalender & Naman Sharma, 2021. "Using extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to predict adoption intention of electric vehicles in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 665-681, January.
    5. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    6. Shafique Ur Rehman & Anam Bhatti & Rapiah Mohamed & Hazeline Ayoup, 2019. "The moderating role of trust and commitment between consumer purchase intention and online shopping behavior in the context of Pakistan," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Yan Shi & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Guangwen Zheng & Muhammad Hamayun & Abdullah Mohammed Ibrahim, 2022. "The Antecedents of Willingness to Adopt and Pay for the IoT in the Agricultural Industry: An Application of the UTAUT 2 Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Hemant Chauhan & Ashutosh Pandey & Saurabh Mishra & Shashi Kant Rai, 2021. "Modeling the predictors of consumers’ online purchase intention of green products: the role of personal innovativeness and environmental drive," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16769-16785, November.
    9. Abdullah Al Mamun & Naeem Hayat & Chinnasamy Agamudai Nambhi Malarvizhi & Noor Raihani Binti Zainol, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Sustainability through Green Composting: A Study among Low-Income Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Che-Hui Lien & Maxwell K. Hsu & Jing-Zhi Shang & Stephen W. Wang, 2021. "Self-service technology adoption by air passengers: a case study of fast air travel services in Taiwan," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9-10), pages 671-695, July.
    11. Jaap Sok & Joao Rossi Borges & Peter Schmidt & Icek Ajzen, 2021. "Farmer Behaviour as Reasoned Action: A Critical Review of Research with the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 388-412, June.
    12. Alalwan, Ali Abdallah, 2020. "Mobile food ordering apps: An empirical study of the factors affecting customer e-satisfaction and continued intention to reuse," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 28-44.
    13. Das, Manish & Habib, Mohshin & Saha, Victor & Jebarajakirthy, Charles, 2021. "Bandwagon vs snob luxuries: Targeting consumers based on uniqueness dominance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    14. Seon Hee Kim & Joon Ho Bae & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2019. "Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Do Giang Nguyen & Minh-Tri Ha, 2022. "What Makes Users Continue to Want to Use the Digital Platform? Evidence From the Ride-Hailing Service Platform in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaggelis Saprikis & Giorgos Avlogiaris, 2023. "Modeling users’ acceptance of mobile social commerce: the case of ‘Instagram checkout’," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 511-540, March.
    2. Sangjae Lee & Byung Gon Kim, 2020. "The Impact of Individual Motivations and Social Capital on the Continuous Usage Intention of Mobile Social Apps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    3. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    5. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    6. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Hong-Wen Lin & Ya-Cing Jhan & Yuan Tseng, 2019. "Behavioral intention of using one-stop mobile application: evidence from department stores," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(12), pages 401-412, December.
    8. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Adamantia Pateli & Naoum Mylonas & Aggeliki Spyrou, 2020. "Organizational Adoption of Social Media in the Hospitality Industry: An Integrated Approach Based on DIT and TOE Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Ritu Agarwal & V. Sambamurthy & Ralph M. Stair, 2000. "Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 418-430, December.
    11. Ng Hui Chen, 2024. "Intention to Use FinTech Payments: The Perspectives of Benefits, Risks, and Openness to Change," GATR Journals gjbssr651, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    12. Natarajan, Thamaraiselvan & Balasubramanian, Senthil Arasu & Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2017. "Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 8-22.
    13. Foshay, Neil & Kuziemsky, Craig, 2014. "Towards an implementation framework for business intelligence in healthcare," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 20-27.
    14. Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Jakob Wirth & Tim Weitzel, 2022. "Trial-Period Technostress: A Conceptual Definition and Mixed-Methods Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 489-514, June.
    15. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    16. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    17. Bang-Ning Hwang & Chi-Yo Huang & Chih-Hsiung Wu, 2016. "A TOE Approach to Establish a Green Supply Chain Adoption Decision Model in the Semiconductor Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    18. Damon E. Campbell & John D. Wells & Joseph S. Valacich, 2013. "Breaking the Ice in B2C Relationships: Understanding Pre-Adoption E-Commerce Attraction," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 219-238, June.
    19. Md Golam Rabiul Alam & Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum & Loo-See Beh & Choong Seon Hong, 2016. "Critical Factors Influencing Decision to Adopt Human Resource Information System (HRIS) in Hospitals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Mun Y. Yi & Fred D. Davis, 2003. "Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 146-169, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-02776-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.