IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v62y2011i10p1851-1860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exact approach for relating recovering surgical patient workload to the master surgical schedule

Author

Listed:
  • P T Vanberkel

    (1] University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands[2] Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, the Netherlands)

  • R J Boucherie

    (University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands)

  • E W Hans

    (University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands)

  • J L Hurink

    (University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands)

  • W A M van Lent

    (1] University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands[2] Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, the Netherlands)

  • W H van Harten

    (1] University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands[2] Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, the Netherlands)

Abstract

No other department influences the workload of a hospital more than the Department of Surgery and in particular, the activities in the operating room. These activities are governed by the master surgical schedule (MSS), which states which patient types receive surgery on which day. In this paper, we describe an analytical approach to project the workload for downstream departments based on this MSS. Specifically, the ward occupancy distributions, patient admission/discharge distributions and the distributions for ongoing interventions/treatments are computed. Recovering after surgery requires the support of multiple departments, such as nursing, physiotherapy, rehabilitation and long-term care. With our model, managers from these departments can determine their workload by aggregating tasks associated with recovering surgical patients. The model, which supported the development of a new MSS at the Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, provides the foundation for a decision support tool to relate downstream hospital departments to the operating room.

Suggested Citation

  • P T Vanberkel & R J Boucherie & E W Hans & J L Hurink & W A M van Lent & W H van Harten, 2011. "An exact approach for relating recovering surgical patient workload to the master surgical schedule," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(10), pages 1851-1860, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:62:y:2011:i:10:p:1851-1860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n10/pdf/jors2010141a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n10/full/jors2010141a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steffen Heider & Jan Schoenfelder & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2022. "Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 311-332, June.
    2. Veneklaas, W. & Leeftink, A.G. & van Boekel, P.H.C.M. & Hans, E.W., 2021. "On the design, implementation, and feasibility of hospital admission services: The admission lounge case," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. van den Broek d’Obrenan, Anne & Ridder, Ad & Roubos, Dennis & Stougie, Leen, 2020. "Minimizing bed occupancy variance by scheduling patients under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 336-349.
    4. Hessam Bavafa & Charles M. Leys & Lerzan Örmeci & Sergei Savin, 2019. "Managing Portfolio of Elective Surgical Procedures: A Multidimensional Inverse Newsvendor Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1543-1563, November.
    5. Anjomshoa, Hamideh & Dumitrescu, Irina & Lustig, Irvin & Smith, Olivia J., 2018. "An exact approach for tactical planning and patient selection for elective surgeries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 728-739.
    6. Zhaohui Li & Haiyue Yu & Zhaowei Zhou, 2024. "Scheduling of elective operations with coordinated utilization of hospital beds and operating rooms," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Grigory Korzhenevich & Anne Zander, 2024. "Leveraging the potential of the German operating room benchmarking initiative for planning: A ready-to-use surgical process data set," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 328-351, September.
    8. Brittney Benchoff & Candace Arai Yano & Alexandra Newman, 2017. "Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center Optimizes Operating Room Block Schedule for New Hospital," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 214-229, June.
    9. Loïc Deklerck & Babak Akbarzadeh & Broos Maenhout, 2022. "Constructing and evaluating a master surgery schedule using a service-level approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3663-3711, September.
    10. John Bowers, 2013. "Balancing operating theatre and bed capacity in a cardiothoracic centre," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 236-244, September.
    11. Santos, Daniel & Marques, Inês, 2022. "Designing master surgery schedules with downstream unit integration via stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 834-852.
    12. Julian Schiele & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2021. "Predicting intensive care unit bed occupancy for integrated operating room scheduling via neural networks," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 65-88, February.
    13. Fügener, Andreas & Hans, Erwin W. & Kolisch, Rainer & Kortbeek, Nikky & Vanberkel, Peter T., 2014. "Master surgery scheduling with consideration of multiple downstream units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 227-236.
    14. Thomas Schneider, A.J. & Theresia van Essen, J. & Carlier, Mijke & Hans, Erwin W., 2020. "Scheduling surgery groups considering multiple downstream resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 741-752.
    15. Xiangyong Li & N. Rafaliya & M. Fazle Baki & Ben A. Chaouch, 2017. "Scheduling elective surgeries: the tradeoff among bed capacity, waiting patients and operating room utilization using goal programming," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 33-54, March.
    16. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:62:y:2011:i:10:p:1851-1860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.