IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v59y2008i7d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance criteria for plastic card fraud detection tools

Author

Listed:
  • D J Hand

    (Imperial College
    Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Imperial College)

  • C Whitrow

    (Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Imperial College)

  • N M Adams

    (Imperial College)

  • P Juszczak

    (Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Imperial College)

  • D Weston

    (Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Imperial College)

Abstract

In predictive data mining, algorithms will be both optimized and compared using a measure of predictive performance. Different measures will yield different results, and it follows that it is crucial to match the measure to the true objectives. In this paper, we explore the desirable characteristics of measures for constructing and evaluating tools for mining plastic card data to detect fraud. We define two measures, one based on minimizing the overall cost to the card company, and the other based on minimizing the amount of fraud given the maximum number of investigations the card company can afford to make. We also describe a plot, analogous to the standard ROC, for displaying the performance trace of an algorithm as the relative costs of the two different kinds of misclassification—classing a fraudulent transaction as legitimate or vice versa—are varied.

Suggested Citation

  • D J Hand & C Whitrow & N M Adams & P Juszczak & D Weston, 2008. "Performance criteria for plastic card fraud detection tools," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(7), pages 956-962, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:59:y:2008:i:7:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602418
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602418
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D J Hand, 2005. "Good practice in retail credit scorecard assessment," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(9), pages 1109-1117, September.
    2. D. J. Hand, 2001. "Measuring Diagnostic Accuracy of Statistical Prediction Rules," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 55(1), pages 3-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Yi & Guo, Yuxuan & Chang, Xiangyu, 2021. "Angle-based cost-sensitive multicategory classification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Lessmann, Stefan & Voß, Stefan, 2009. "A reference model for customer-centric data mining with support vector machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 520-530, December.
    3. Xing, Jin & Chi, Guotai & Pan, Ancheng, 2024. "Instance-dependent misclassification cost-sensitive learning for default prediction," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Christoforos Anagnostopoulos & Dimitris Tasoulis & Niall Adams & David Hand, 2009. "Temporally adaptive estimation of logistic classifiers on data streams," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 3(3), pages 243-261, December.
    5. Bart Baesens & Sebastiaan Höppner & Irene Ortner & Tim Verdonck, 2021. "robROSE: A robust approach for dealing with imbalanced data in fraud detection," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 841-861, September.
    6. Finlay, Steven, 2010. "Credit scoring for profitability objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 528-537, April.
    7. Hand, David J. & Crowder, Martin J., 2012. "Overcoming selectivity bias in evaluating new fraud detection systems for revolving credit operations," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 216-223.
    8. Sanjeev Jha & J. Christopher Westland, 2013. "A Descriptive Study of Credit Card Fraud Pattern," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(3), pages 373-384, September.
    9. Höppner, Sebastiaan & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter & Verdonck, Tim, 2022. "Instance-dependent cost-sensitive learning for detecting transfer fraud," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 291-300.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tune H Pers & Anders Albrechtsen & Claus Holst & Thorkild I A Sørensen & Thomas A Gerds, 2009. "The Validation and Assessment of Machine Learning: A Game of Prediction from High-Dimensional Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Crone, Sven F. & Finlay, Steven, 2012. "Instance sampling in credit scoring: An empirical study of sample size and balancing," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 224-238.
    3. T Bellotti & J Crook, 2009. "Credit scoring with macroeconomic variables using survival analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1699-1707, December.
    4. Dumitrescu, Elena & Hué, Sullivan & Hurlin, Christophe & Tokpavi, Sessi, 2022. "Machine learning for credit scoring: Improving logistic regression with non-linear decision-tree effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1178-1192.
    5. Yusuf Priyo Anggodo & Abba Suganda Girsang, 2024. "A Novel Modified Binning and Logistics Regression to Handle Shifting in Credit Scoring," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2371-2403, June.
    6. Lessmann, Stefan & Baesens, Bart & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Thomas, Lyn C., 2015. "Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 124-136.
    7. Walter Krämer & Michael Bücker, 2011. "Probleme des Qualitätsvergleichs von Kreditausfallprognosen," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 5(1), pages 39-58, March.
    8. Elena Ivona DUMITRESCU & Sullivan HUE & Christophe HURLIN & Sessi TOKPAVI, 2020. "Machine Learning or Econometrics for Credit Scoring: Let’s Get the Best of Both Worlds," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2839, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    9. Crook, Jonathan N. & Edelman, David B. & Thomas, Lyn C., 2007. "Recent developments in consumer credit risk assessment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(3), pages 1447-1465, December.
    10. Jessica Gronsbell & Molei Liu & Lu Tian & Tianxi Cai, 2022. "Efficient evaluation of prediction rules in semi‐supervised settings under stratified sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1353-1391, September.
    11. David J. Hand, 2008. "Comment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 259-259, March.
    12. Finlay, Steven, 2010. "Credit scoring for profitability objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 528-537, April.
    13. Fang, Fang & Chen, Yuanyuan, 2019. "A new approach for credit scoring by directly maximizing the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 180-194.
    14. Anna Stelzer, 2019. "Predicting credit default probabilities using machine learning techniques in the face of unequal class distributions," Papers 1907.12996, arXiv.org.
    15. Runchi Zhang & Zhiyi Qiu, 2020. "Optimizing hyper-parameters of neural networks with swarm intelligence: A novel framework for credit scoring," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-35, June.
    16. Kaiser, Ulrich & Kuhn, Johan M., 2020. "The value of publicly available, textual and non-textual information for startup performance prediction," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    17. Manojit Chattopadhyay & Subrata Kumar Mitra, 2017. "Applicability and effectiveness of classifications models for achieving the twin objectives of growth and outreach of microfinance institutions," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 451-474, December.
    18. Elena Ballante & Silvia Figini & Pierpaolo Uberti, 2022. "A new approach in model selection for ordinal target variables," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 43-56, March.
    19. Ballings, Michel & Van den Poel, Dirk, 2015. "CRM in social media: Predicting increases in Facebook usage frequency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 248-260.
    20. Kaiser, Ulrich & Kuhn, Johan Moritz, 2020. "Value of Publicly Available, Textual and Non-textuThe al Information for Startup Performance Prediction," IZA Discussion Papers 13029, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:59:y:2008:i:7:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.