IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v37y2022i1d10.1007_s00180-021-01112-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach in model selection for ordinal target variables

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Ballante

    (University of Pavia)

  • Silvia Figini

    (University of Pavia)

  • Pierpaolo Uberti

    (University of Genova)

Abstract

Multi-class predictive models are generally evaluated averaging binary classification indicators without a distinction between nominal and ordinal dependent variables. This paper introduces a novel approach to assess performances of predictive models characterized by an ordinal target variable and a new index for model evaluation is proposed. The new index satisfies mathematical properties and it can be applied to the evaluation of parametric and non parametric models. In order to show how our performance indicator works, empirical evidences obtained on toy examples and simulated data are provided. On the basis of the results achieved, we underline that our approach can be a more suitable criterion for model selection than the performance indexes currently suggested in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Ballante & Silvia Figini & Pierpaolo Uberti, 2022. "A new approach in model selection for ordinal target variables," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 43-56, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:37:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-021-01112-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-021-01112-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-021-01112-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-021-01112-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gigliarano, Chiara & Figini, Silvia & Muliere, Pietro, 2014. "Making classifier performance comparisons when ROC curves intersect," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 300-312.
    2. D. J. Hand, 2001. "Measuring Diagnostic Accuracy of Statistical Prediction Rules," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 55(1), pages 3-16, March.
    3. Galimberti, Giuliano & Soffritti, Gabriele & Maso, Matteo Di, 2012. "Classification Trees for Ordinal Responses in R: The rpartScore Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 47(i10).
    4. Adolfo Morrone & Alfonso Piscitelli & Antonio D’Ambrosio, 2019. "How Disadvantages Shape Life Satisfaction: An Alternative Methodological Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 477-502, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosaria Simone, 2023. "Uncertainty Diagnostics of Binomial Regression Trees for Ordered Rating Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(1), pages 79-105, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tune H Pers & Anders Albrechtsen & Claus Holst & Thorkild I A Sørensen & Thomas A Gerds, 2009. "The Validation and Assessment of Machine Learning: A Game of Prediction from High-Dimensional Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Yuanyuan Shen & Katherine P. Liao & Tianxi Cai, 2015. "Sparse kernel machine regression for ordinal outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 63-70, March.
    3. Silvia Figini & Roberto Savona & Marika Vezzoli, 2016. "Corporate Default Prediction Model Averaging: A Normative Linear Pooling Approach," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1-2), pages 6-20, January.
    4. Adolfo Morrone & Alfonso Piscitelli & Antonio D’Ambrosio, 2019. "How Disadvantages Shape Life Satisfaction: An Alternative Methodological Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 477-502, January.
    5. Mussini Mauro, 2018. "On Measuring Polarization For Ordinal Data: An Approach Based On The Decomposition Of The Leti Index," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 19(2), pages 277-296, June.
    6. D J Hand & C Whitrow & N M Adams & P Juszczak & D Weston, 2008. "Performance criteria for plastic card fraud detection tools," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(7), pages 956-962, July.
    7. Luis Alberto Holgado-Apaza & Nelly Jacqueline Ulloa-Gallardo & Ruth Nataly Aragon-Navarrete & Raidith Riva-Ruiz & Naomi Karina Odagawa-Aragon & Danger David Castellon-Apaza & Edgar E. Carpio-Vargas & , 2024. "The Exploration of Predictors for Peruvian Teachers’ Life Satisfaction through an Ensemble of Feature Selection Methods and Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Jessica Gronsbell & Molei Liu & Lu Tian & Tianxi Cai, 2022. "Efficient evaluation of prediction rules in semi‐supervised settings under stratified sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1353-1391, September.
    9. Abbas Keramati & Hajar Ghaneei & Seyed Mohammad Mirmohammadi, 2016. "Developing a prediction model for customer churn from electronic banking services using data mining," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Angela Maria D’Uggento & Alfonso Piscitelli & Nunziata Ribecco & Germana Scepi, 2023. "Perceived climate change risk and global green activism among young people," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(4), pages 1167-1195, October.
    11. Verme, Paolo & Gigliarano, Chiara, 2019. "Optimal targeting under budget constraints in a humanitarian context," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 224-233.
    12. Kaiser, Ulrich & Kuhn, Johan M., 2020. "The value of publicly available, textual and non-textual information for startup performance prediction," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    13. Wolf, Bethany J. & Slate, Elizabeth H. & Hill, Elizabeth G., 2015. "Ordinal Logic Regression: A classifier for discovering combinations of binary markers for ordinal outcomes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 152-163.
    14. Buczak, Philip, 2024. "fabOF: A Novel Tree Ensemble Method for Ordinal Prediction," OSF Preprints h8t4p, Center for Open Science.
    15. Kaiser, Ulrich & Kuhn, Johan Moritz, 2020. "Value of Publicly Available, Textual and Non-textuThe al Information for Startup Performance Prediction," IZA Discussion Papers 13029, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Gerhard Tutz, 2022. "Ordinal Trees and Random Forests: Score-Free Recursive Partitioning and Improved Ensembles," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(2), pages 241-263, July.
    17. Mauro Mussini, 2018. "On Measuring Polarization For Ordinal Data: An Approach Based On The Decomposition Of The Leti Index," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 19(2), pages 277-296, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:37:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-021-01112-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.