IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jofsma/v22y2017i3d10.1057_s41264-017-0031-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial services Apps: What makes the difference between a great and a ghastly review?

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Vella

    (University of Malta)

  • Åsa Wallström

    (Luleå University of Technology)

  • Mana Farshid

    (Royal Institute of Technology (KTH))

Abstract

Internet as we know it, has entered a spiral of decline while mobile Apps are gradually taking over and are steadily changing the way we go about our individual daily lives. This study examines the fact that certain financial services Apps are far more successful than others, specifically by looking at what makes a user think that an App may be great, and give it a favorable review, or that it is rather ghastly, and give it an unfavorable review. Next, we describe a study of six of the most popular financial services Apps on the iTunes App Store, for which reviews were analyzed using DICTION software. Employing Diction variables, ambivalence and temporal terms were prevalent in negative reviews while accomplishment, motion, optimism and certainty, were predominantly expressed in positive reviews. Human interest, on the other hand, seemed to be uniformly distributed between both types of reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Vella & Åsa Wallström & Mana Farshid, 2017. "Financial services Apps: What makes the difference between a great and a ghastly review?," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 132-138, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jofsma:v:22:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1057_s41264-017-0031-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41264-017-0031-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41264-017-0031-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41264-017-0031-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, George Chung-Chi, 2015. "Users' adoption of mobile applications: Product type and message framing's moderating effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2317-2321.
    2. Roel Wijland & Paul Hansen & Fatima Gardezi, 2016. "Mobile nudging: Youth engagement with banking apps," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 51-63, March.
    3. Mark A. Harris & Steven Furnell & Karen Patten, 2014. "Comparing the Mobile Device Security Behavior of College Students and Information Technology Professionals," Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 186-202, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harris, Mark A. & Brookshire, Robert & Chin, Amita Goyal, 2016. "Identifying factors influencing consumers’ intent to install mobile applications," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 441-450.
    2. Teklemariam, Mekuria Haile, 2021. "Developing a tailored strategy for mobile applications’ adoption across diffusion levels: A panel data analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Martins, José & Costa, Catarina & Oliveira, Tiago & Gonçalves, Ramiro & Branco, Frederico, 2019. "How smartphone advertising influences consumers' purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 378-387.
    4. Somia Moh. T. L. Ashafee* & Nur Haryani Zakaria & Hatim Mohamad Tahir & Norliza Katuk & Mohd Nizam Omar, 2018. "Security Behaviors on Social Network Sites Used For Academic Purposes: A Comparison of Security Preparedness and Awareness among IT and Non-IT Postgraduate Students," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 839-846:6.
    5. Rae Yule Kim, 2020. "The influx of skeptics: an investigation of the diffusion cycle effect on online review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(4), pages 821-835, December.
    6. Lee, Young-Jin & Ghasemkhani, Hossein & Xie, Karen & Tan, Yong, 2021. "Switching decision, timing, and app performance: An empirical analysis of mobile app developers’ switching behavior between monetization strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 332-345.
    7. De Vries, Eline L.E. & Zhang, Sha, 2020. "The effectiveness of random discounts for migrating customers to the mobile channel," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 272-281.
    8. Aydin Gokgoz, Zeynep & Ataman, M. Berk & van Bruggen, Gerrit H., 2021. "There’s an app for that! understanding the drivers of mobile application downloads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 423-437.
    9. Patel, Vipul & Das, Kallol & Chatterjee, Ravi & Shukla, Yupal, 2020. "Does the interface quality of mobile shopping apps affect purchase intention? An empirical study," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 300-309.
    10. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & Al-Nabhani, Khalid & Marriott, Hannah, 2020. "Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers' m-commerce mobile applications – An initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 139-157.
    11. Mark McGillivray & Simon Feeny & Paul Hansen & Stephen Knowles & Franz Ombler, 2023. "What are Valid Weights for the Human Development Index? A Discrete Choice Experiment for the United Kingdom," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 679-694, January.
    12. Chien-Lung Hsu & Yi-Chuan Liao, 2019. "Bridging User Perception and Stickiness in Business Microblog Contexts: A Moderated Mediation Model," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    13. O'Connor, Genevieve E. & Myrden, Susan & Alkire (née Nasr), Linda & Lee, Kyungwon & Köcher, Sören & Kandampully, Jay & Williams, Jerome D., 2021. "Digital Health Experience: A Regulatory Focus Perspective," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 121-136.
    14. Kurtaliqi, Fidan & Lancelot Miltgen, Caroline & Viglia, Giampaolo & Pantin-Sohier, Gaëlle, 2024. "Using advanced mixed methods approaches: Combining PLS-SEM and qualitative studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Ting Fan & Bo Pu & Samart Powpaka & Liaogang Hao, 2019. "The Impact of Disaster of a National Airline on the Nation’s Tourism: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Tiina Koskelainen & Panu Kalmi & Eusebio Scornavacca & Tero Vartiainen, 2023. "Financial literacy in the digital age—A research agenda," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 507-528, January.
    17. Kumar, Deepak S. & Purani, Keyoor & Viswanathan, Shyam A., 2018. "Influences of ‘appscape’ on mobile app adoption and m-loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 132-141.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jofsma:v:22:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1057_s41264-017-0031-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.