IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/develp/v54y2011i1p21-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food Sovereignty and Alternative Paradigms to Confront Land Grabbing and the Food and Climate Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Rosset

Abstract

In the contemporary world we face a systemic crisis where multiple dimensions converge, including an economic crisis, a financial crisis, a climate crisis, an energy crisis, a food crisis, and runaway land grabbing. Peter Rosset argues for a paradigm shift toward food sovereignty based on genuine agrarian reform and sustainable peasant agriculture, which he sees as the only way to address the multiple crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Rosset, 2011. "Food Sovereignty and Alternative Paradigms to Confront Land Grabbing and the Food and Climate Crises," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 54(1), pages 21-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:develp:v:54:y:2011:i:1:p:21-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/development/journal/v54/n1/pdf/dev2010102a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/development/journal/v54/n1/full/dev2010102a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatriz Vizuete & Elisa Oteros-Rozas & Marina García-Llorente, 2024. "Role of the neo-rural phenomenon and the new peasantry in agroecological transitions: a literature review," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 1277-1297, September.
    2. Kumeh, Eric Mensah & Omulo, Godfrey, 2019. "Youth’s access to agricultural land in Sub-Saharan Africa: A missing link in the global land grabbing discourse," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Genesis Tambang Yengoh & Frederick Ato Armah, 2015. "Effects of Large-Scale Acquisition on Food Insecurity in Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-35, July.
    4. Silvia Saravia Matus & Jacques Delincé & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2013. "An Overview of (International) Large-Scale Land Transactions (LSLT) in the context of Food Security," JRC Research Reports JRC81127, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Suraya Hudson & Naomi Krogman & Mary Beckie, 2016. "Social practices of knowledge mobilization for sustainable food production: nutrition gardening and fish farming in the kolli hills of India," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(3), pages 523-533, June.
    6. Eva Cudlínová & Valny Giacomelli Sobrinho & Miloslav Lapka & Luca Salvati, 2020. "New Forms of Land Grabbing Due to the Bioeconomy: The Case of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. François Fortier & Tran Thi Thu Trang, 2013. "Agricultural Modernization and Climate Change in Vietnam's Post-Socialist Transition," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(1), pages 81-99, January.
    8. Sophie Redecker & Christian Herzig, 2020. "The Peasant Way of a More than Radical Democracy: The Case of La Via Campesina," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 657-670, July.
    9. Adriana Ruiz-Almeida & Marta G. Rivera-Ferre, 2019. "Internationally-based indicators to measure Agri-food systems sustainability using food sovereignty as a conceptual framework," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(6), pages 1321-1337, December.
    10. Otto Hospes, 2014. "Food sovereignty: the debate, the deadlock, and a suggested detour," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(1), pages 119-130, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:develp:v:54:y:2011:i:1:p:21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.