IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pab/rmcpee/v35y2023i1p360-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valoración de estrategias competitivas, acuerdos colaborativos y penalizaciones con Opciones Reales Multinomiales y Teoría de Juegos
[Valuation of competitive strategies, collaborative agreements and penalties with Multinomial Real Options and Game Theory]

Author

Listed:
  • Milanesi, Gastón Silverio

    (Universidad Nacional del Sur (Argentina))

Abstract

El diseño y elección de estrategias en entornos competitivos requiere considerar tres posibles fuentes de incertidumbre: riesgos derivados de las acciones propias, riesgos emergentes de estados de la naturaleza y riesgos derivados de las decisiones de competidores. La Teoría de Opciones Reales analiza los dos primeros riesgos, pero no incorpora la incertidumbre derivada de las acciones de los competidores. Para ello, la Teoría de Juegos debe sumarse al modelo. Se desarrolla un modelo numérico de Teoría de Juego y Opciones Reales Multinomiales, para valorar estrategias competitivas secuenciales de iniciativa (preemption) y acuerdos estratégicos (join venture). Además, para los acuerdos es desarrollado un modelo de cálculo de penalizaciones, una herramienta analítica para calcular resarcimientos monetarios ante incumplimiento contractual. Las estrategias puras y mixtas son seleccionadas con equilibrios de Nash y valoradas con opciones reales multinomiales. El marco teórico expone el modelo binomial y el multinomial para evaluar riesgo tecnológico y de mercado no correlacionado. También, son desarrollados los elementos básicos de la Teoría de Juegos y sus formas de resolución. A continuación, utilizando la metodología de casos, el modelo es aplicado para valorar casos de estrategias de iniciativa y acuerdo. Los resultados obtenidos son presentados en forma extensiva y matricial. Finalmente, se expone la valoración de multas para inducir las conductas cooperativas y cumplimiento de acuerdos.

Suggested Citation

  • Milanesi, Gastón Silverio, 2023. "Valoración de estrategias competitivas, acuerdos colaborativos y penalizaciones con Opciones Reales Multinomiales y Teoría de Juegos [Valuation of competitive strategies, collaborative agreements a," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 35(1), pages 360-388, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pab:rmcpee:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:360-388
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.6092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/RevMetCuant/article/view/6092/6837
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/RevMetCuant/article/view/6092
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.6092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boyer, Marcel & Lasserre, Pierre & Moreaux, Michel, 2012. "A dynamic duopoly investment game without commitment under uncertain market expansion," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 663-681.
    2. Pauli Murto, 2004. "Exit in Duopoly Under Uncertainty," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 35(1), pages 111-127, Spring.
    3. Thijssen, Jacco J.J., 2010. "Preemption in a real option game with a first mover advantage and player-specific uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(6), pages 2448-2462, November.
    4. Fudenberg, Drew & Tirole, Jean, 1986. "A Theory of Exit in Duopoly," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 943-960, July.
    5. Grzegorz Pawlina & Peter M. Kort, 2006. "Real Options in an Asymmetric Duopoly: Who Benefits from Your Competitive Disadvantage?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 1-35, March.
    6. Andrea Gamba & Lenos Trigeorgis, 2007. "An Improved Binomial Lattice Method for Multi-Dimensional Options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 453-475.
    7. Yao-Wen Hsu & Bart Lambrecht, 2007. "Preemptive patenting under uncertainty and asymmetric information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 5-28, April.
    8. Mark Rubinstein., 2000. "On the Relation Between Binomial and Trinomial Option Pricing Models," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-292, University of California at Berkeley.
    9. Avinash K. Dixit & Robert S. Pindyck, 1994. "Investment under Uncertainty," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 5474.
    10. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1972. "The Valuation of Option Contracts and a Test of Market Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 399-417, May.
    11. Drew Fudenberg & Jean Tirole, 1985. "Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 52(3), pages 383-401.
    12. Rubinstein, Mark, 1983. "Displaced Diffusion Option Pricing," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 38(1), pages 213-217, March.
    13. Rubinstein, Mark, 1994. "Implied Binomial Trees," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(3), pages 771-818, July.
    14. Mark Rubinstein., 1994. "Implied Binomial Trees," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-232, University of California at Berkeley.
    15. Chevalier-Roignant, Benoît & Flath, Christoph M. & Huchzermeier, Arnd & Trigeorgis, Lenos, 2011. "Strategic investment under uncertainty: A synthesis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 639-650, December.
    16. Broadie, Mark & Kaya, Özgür, 2007. "A Binomial Lattice Method for Pricing Corporate Debt and Modeling Chapter 11 Proceedings," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 279-312, June.
    17. Rubinstein, Mark, 2000. "On the Relation Between Binomial and Trinomial Option Pricing Models," Research Program in Finance, Working Paper Series qt3bw450n0, Research Program in Finance, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azevedo, Alcino & Paxson, Dean, 2014. "Developing real option game models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 909-920.
    2. Chevalier-Roignant, Benoît & Flath, Christoph M. & Huchzermeier, Arnd & Trigeorgis, Lenos, 2011. "Strategic investment under uncertainty: A synthesis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 639-650, December.
    3. Alcino Azevedo & Dean Paxson, 2018. "Rivalry and uncertainty in complementary investments with dynamic market sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 319-355, December.
    4. Jacco J.J. Thijssen, "undated". "Equilibria in Continuous Time Preemption Games with Markovian Payoffs," Discussion Papers 11/17, Department of Economics, University of York.
    5. Jan-Henrik Steg, 2015. "Symmetric Equilibria in Stochastic Timing Games," Papers 1507.04797, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    6. Bruno Versaevel, 2015. "Alertness, Leadership, and Nascent Market Dynamics," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 440-466, December.
    7. Boyarchenko, Svetlana & Levendorskiĭ, Sergei, 2014. "Preemption games under Lévy uncertainty," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 354-380.
    8. Kuno J.M. Huisman & Peter M. Kort, 2015. "Strategic capacity investment under uncertainty," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(2), pages 376-408, June.
    9. Diana Terrazas‐Santamaria, 2021. "Strategic introduction of a new product under uncertainty: A duopoly case," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 796-807, June.
    10. Steg, Jan-Henrik & Thijssen, Jacco J.J., 2023. "Strategic investment with positive externalities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-21.
    11. Dehghani Mohammad H., 2018. "Strategic Investment under Incomplete Information," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Billette de Villemeur, Etienne & Ruble, Richard & Versaevel, Bruno, 2014. "Investment timing and vertical relationships," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 110-123.
    13. Billette de Villemeur, Etienne & Ruble, Richard & Versaevel, Bruno, 2014. "Innovation and imitation incentives in dynamic duopoly," MPRA Paper 59453, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Thijssen, Jacco J.J. & Huisman, Kuno J.M. & Kort, Peter M., 2012. "Symmetric equilibrium strategies in game theoretic real option models," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 219-225.
    15. Ebina, Takeshi & Matsushima, Noriaki & Nishide, Katsumasa, 2022. "Demand uncertainty, product differentiation, and entry timing under spatial competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 286-297.
    16. Steg, Jan-Henrik & Thijssen, Jacco, 2015. "Quick or Persistent? Strategic Investment Demanding Versatility," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 541, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    17. Carlos Andrés Zapata Quimbayo, 2020. "OPCIONES REALES Una guía teórico-práctica para la valoración de inversiones bajo incertidumbre mediante modelos en tiempo discreto y simulación de Monte Carlo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, number 138, April.
    18. Goto, Makoto & Nishide, Katsumasa & Takashima, Ryuta, 2017. "Leaders, followers, and equity risk premiums in booms and busts," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 207-220.
    19. Arasteh, Abdollah, 2017. "Considering the investment decisions with real options games approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1282-1294.
    20. Colombo, Luca & Labrecciosa, Paola, 2021. "A stochastic differential game of duopolistic competition with sticky prices," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    valoración de estrategias; opciones reales multinomiales; teoría de juegos; estrategia de iniciativa; acuerdo estratégico; valoración de penalizaciones; strategies valuation; multinomial real options; game theory; pre-emption; join venture; penalties valuation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pab:rmcpee:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:360-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publicación Digital - UPO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dmupoes.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.