IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v44y2017i4p759-777..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Expression Cues in Product Rating Distributions: When People Prefer Polarizing Products

Author

Listed:
  • Bella Rozenkrants
  • S Christian Wheeler
  • Baba Shiv
  • Gita JoharEditor
  • Derek RuckerAssociate Editor

Abstract

Previous research has shown that material goods can help people self-express, either because the products are themselves self-expressive (e.g., a band T-shirt) or because the products are associated with a desired group. This article examines a new signal of self-expressiveness: whether the product is polarizing—that is, whether some people strongly like the product and other people strongly dislike the product. Eight studies examine how polarization and its associated indicator in the online domain (a bimodal distribution of user star ratings) affects consumer preferences. The results indicate that polarizing products are perceived to be more self-expressive and to serve as stronger indicators of one’s tastes and personality. As a result, people find products with bimodal rating distributions to be more desirable when they experience temporary or chronic low self-concept clarity. Further, people evaluate products with bimodal distributions more favorably in consumption contexts in which self-expression is important. These effects emerge when the bimodal distribution pertains to a self-expressive attribute (e.g., style) but not when it pertains to a non-self-expressive attribute (e.g., quality). Last, the effect is especially strong when people have the motivation to express an individual- rather than group-level identity. Hence, polarizing products are seen as vehicles for individual self-expression.

Suggested Citation

  • Bella Rozenkrants & S Christian Wheeler & Baba Shiv & Gita JoharEditor & Derek RuckerAssociate Editor, 2017. "Self-Expression Cues in Product Rating Distributions: When People Prefer Polarizing Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 759-777.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:44:y:2017:i:4:p:759-777.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucx067
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    2. Cindy Chan & Jonah Berger & Leaf Van Boven, 2012. "Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 561-573.
    3. Wang, Feng & Liu, Xuefeng & Fang, Eric (Er), 2015. "User Reviews Variance, Critic Reviews Variance, and Product Sales: An Exploration of Customer Breadth and Depth Effects," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 372-389.
    4. Monic Sun, 2012. "How Does the Variance of Product Ratings Matter?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(4), pages 696-707, April.
    5. Katherine White & Jennifer J. Argo & Jaideep Sengupta, 2012. "Dissociative versus Associative Responses to Social Identity Threat: The Role of Consumer Self-Construal," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 704-719.
    6. Stephen X. He & Samuel D. Bond, 2015. "Why Is the Crowd Divided? Attribution for Dispersion in Online Word of Mouth," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1509-1527.
    7. Katherine White & Jennifer J. Argo, 2011. "When Imitation Doesn't Flatter: The Role of Consumer Distinctiveness in Responses to Mimicry," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(4), pages 667-680.
    8. S. Christian Wheeler & Richard E. Petty & George Y. Bizer, 2005. "Self-Schema Matching and Attitude Change: Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Message Elaboration," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 787-797, March.
    9. Jonah Berger & Chip Heath, 2007. "Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 121-134, June.
    10. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2008. "Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 257-267, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyungsuk Choi & Yeosun Yoon, 2021. "Finding Myself Fast and Furiously: The Role of Agency-Communion Orientation and Self-Concept Clarity in Support for Radicalism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Chung, Myungjin & Saini, Ritesh, 2022. "Consumer self-uncertainty increases price dependency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 40-48.
    3. Lana Xianglan Nan & Sang Kyu Park & Yang Yang & Amna Kirmani & June Cotte & Brent McFerran, 2023. "Rejections Are More Contagious than Choices: How Another’s Decisions Shape Our Own," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(2), pages 363-381.
    4. Li, You & Chang, Yaping & Liang, Zhehao, 2022. "Attracting more meaningful interactions: The impact of question and product types on comments on social media advertisings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 89-101.
    5. Rabassa, Valérie & Sabri, Ouidade & Spaletta, Claire, 2022. "Conversational commerce: Do biased choices offered by voice assistants’ technology constrain its appropriation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Gould, Stephen & Goldsmith, Emily & Lee, Michael, 2020. "The choice polarity effect: An investigation of evolutionary-based trait handedness and perceived magnitudes on laterally displayed choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 627-637.
    7. Osuna Ramírez, Sergio Andrés & Veloutsou, Cleopatra & Morgan-Thomas, Anna, 2024. "On the antipodes of love and hate: The conception and measurement of brand polarization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Daniel Villanova, 2019. "The extended self, product valuation, and the endowment effect," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 357-371, December.
    9. Dirk van Straaten & Vitalik Melnikov & Eyke Hüllermeier & Behnud Mir Djawadi & René Fahr, 2021. "Accounting for Heuristics in Reputation Systems: An Interdisciplinary Approach on Aggregation Processes," Working Papers Dissertations 72, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    10. Koorank Beheshti, Mohammadali & Gopinath, Mahesh & Ashouri, Sama & Zal, Saeed, 2023. "Does polarizing personality matter in influencer marketing? Evidence from Instagram," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Bikram P. Ghosh & Michael R. Galbreth, 2023. "The weight of the crowd, social information credibility, and firm strategy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(4), pages 1079-1095, April.
    12. Monahan, Lisa & Espinosa, Jennifer A. & Langenderfer, Jeff & Ortinau, David J., 2023. "Did you hear our brand is hated? The unexpected upside of hate-acknowledging advertising for polarizing brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:363-381. is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Dixon, Darcie & Mikolon, Sven, 2021. "Cents of self: How and when self-signals influence consumer value derived from choices of green products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 365-386.
    15. Liu, Fu & Wei, Haiying & Wang, Xingyuan & Zhu, Zhenzhong & Chen, Haipeng Allan, 2023. "The influence of online review dispersion on consumers’ purchase intention: The moderating role of dialectical thinking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Xia Jiang & Fengyi Deng & Qing Yao & Defeng Yang, 2024. "Better or different? How mimicry by social groups shapes consumers’ preference for differentiated brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(5), pages 502-515, September.
    17. Fazli-Salehi, Reza & Torres, Ivonne M. & Madadi, Rozbeh & Zúñiga, Miguel Ángel, 2021. "Multicultural advertising: The impact of consumers’ self-concept clarity and materialism on self-brand connection and communal-brand connection," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 46-57.
    18. He (Michael) Jia & Echo Wen Wan & Wanyi Zheng, 2023. "Stars versus Bars: How the Aesthetics of Product Ratings “Shape” Product Preference," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(1), pages 142-166.
    19. Liu, Mengmeng & Morrin, Maureen & Chae, Boyoun Grace, 2022. "Stop arguing! How childhood exposure to interparental conflict affects consumer response toward product review dispersion," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1093-1107.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    2. Reed, Americus & Forehand, Mark R. & Puntoni, Stefano & Warlop, Luk, 2012. "Identity-based consumer behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 310-321.
    3. Jennifer K D’Angelo & Kristin Diehl & Lisa A Cavanaugh, 2019. "Lead by Example? Custom-Made Examples Created by Close Others Lead Consumers to Make Dissimilar Choices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 750-773.
    4. Dariusz Drążkowski & Maciej Behnke & Lukasz D Kaczmarek, 2021. "I am afraid, so I buy it! The effects of anxiety on consumer assimilation and differentiation needs amongst individuals primed with independent and interdependent self-construal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Zhuomin Shi & Zaoying Kuang & Ning Yang, 2017. "Why it is hard to explain Chinese face?—FACE measurement models and its influence on ecological product preference," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    7. Dominik Gutt, 2018. "In the Eye of the Beholder? Empirically Decomposing Different Economic Implications of the Online Rating Variance," Working Papers Dissertations 40, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    8. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    9. Carvalho, Sergio W. & Luna, David & Goldsmith, Emily, 2019. "The role of national identity in consumption: An integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 310-318.
    10. Wang, Fang & Menon, Kalyani & Ranaweera, Chatura, 2018. "Dynamic trends in online product ratings: A diagnostic utility explanation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 80-89.
    11. Xie, Guangming & Lü, Kevin & Gupta, Suraksha & Jiang, Yushi & Shi, Li, 2021. "How Dispersive Opinions Affect Consumer Decisions: Endowment Effect Guides Attributional Inferences," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 621-638.
    12. Liu, Fu & Wei, Haiying & Zhu, Zhenzhong & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2022. "Warmth or competence: Brand anthropomorphism, social exclusion, and advertisement effectiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Xitong Li, 2018. "Impact of Average Rating on Social Media Endorsement: The Moderating Role of Rating Dispersion and Discount Threshold," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 739-754, September.
    14. Remi Trudel & Jennifer J. Argo & Matthew D. Meng, 2016. "The Recycled Self: Consumers’ Disposal Decisions of Identity-Linked Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 246-264.
    15. Bonnie Simpson & Jennifer L. Robertson & Katherine White, 2020. "How Co-creation Increases Employee Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Engagement: The Moderating Role of Self-Construal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 331-350, October.
    16. Dong, Xiaodan & Zhang, Zelin & Zhang, YiJing & Ao, Xiang & Tang, Tanya (Ya), 2024. "Post diversity: A new lens of social media WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Qin, Yao & Wang, Xuehua, 2023. "Power distance belief and the desire for uniqueness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Xia Jiang & Fengyi Deng & Qing Yao & Defeng Yang, 2024. "Better or different? How mimicry by social groups shapes consumers’ preference for differentiated brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(5), pages 502-515, September.
    19. Gensler, Sonja & Völckner, Franziska & Liu-Thompkins, Yuping & Wiertz, Caroline, 2013. "Managing Brands in the Social Media Environment," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 242-256.
    20. Anika Stuppy & Nicole L Mead & Stijn M J Van Osselaer & JoAndrea Hoegg & Eileen Fischer & Kirmani Amna, 2020. "I Am, Therefore I Buy: Low Self-Esteem and the Pursuit of Self-Verifying Consumption [The Origins of Deference: When Do People Prefer Lower Status?]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(5), pages 956-973.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:44:y:2017:i:4:p:759-777.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.