IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v19y2023i2p193-219..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Enforcement of the Cartel Prohibition in Healthcare Reflect Public and Political Attitudes Towards Competition? A Longitudinal Study From the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Wouter van der Schors
  • Marco Varkevisser

Abstract

In market-based healthcare systems, due to the high and increasing degree of integration between healthcare providers and purchasers, the enforcement of the cartel prohibition is both important and ever more complex. Competition authorities operate independently, but their approach to enforcement may be influenced by the public and political context. Within the setting of the Dutch healthcare system, we study how the cartel prohibition was enforced between 2004 and 2020 and focus on whether a relationship with public and political attitudes towards competition in healthcare can be observed. Using both qualitative and sentiment analyses, we assessed 38 formal and informal documents issued by the competition authority, 126 written parliamentary questions and almost 1,500 newspaper articles. Our findings reveal that during the first half of the study period (2004–2012), ex-post punitive formal enforcement of violations of the cartel prohibition, such as market-sharing and price-fixing agreements, predominated. During the second half of the study period (2012–2020); however, the competition authority’s focus seems to have shifted toward providing ex-ante informal guidance. We clearly observe negative public and political attitudes towards competition in healthcare as well as a distinct shift in enforcement of the cartel prohibition in Dutch health care. However, we are not able to test for a causal relationship between both observations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wouter van der Schors & Marco Varkevisser, 2023. "Does Enforcement of the Cartel Prohibition in Healthcare Reflect Public and Political Attitudes Towards Competition? A Longitudinal Study From the Netherlands," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 193-219.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:19:y:2023:i:2:p:193-219.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhad001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maarse, Hans & Jeurissen, Patrick, 2019. "Low institutional trust in health insurers in Dutch health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 288-292.
    2. Peter T Dijkstra & Loet van Stekelenburg, 2021. "Public Attitude in the Netherlands towards Cartels in Comparison to Other Economic Infringements‡," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 620-641.
    3. Loozen, Edith M.H., 2015. "Public healthcare interests require strict competition enforcement," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(7), pages 882-888.
    4. Bertens, R.M. & Vonk, R.A.A., 2020. "Small steps, big change. Forging a public-private health insurance system in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Field, Robert I. & Keller, Catherine & Louazel, Michel, 2020. "Can governments push providers to collaborate? A comparison of hospital network reforms in France and the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1100-1107.
    6. Philip Lowe, 2009. "Competition Policy and the Economic Crisis," CPI Journal, Competition Policy International, vol. 5.
    7. Maarse, Hans & Jeurissen, Patrick & Ruwaard, Dirk, 2016. "Results of the market-oriented reform in the Netherlands: a review," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 161-178, April.
    8. Mike Thelwall & Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou, 2012. "Sentiment strength detection for the social web," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 163-173, January.
    9. de Vries, Hein & Vahl, Jos & Muris, Jean & Evers, Silvia & van der Horst, Henriëtte & Cheung, Kei Long, 2021. "Effects of the reform of the Dutch healthcare into managed competition: Results of a Delphi study among experts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 27-33.
    10. Mike Thelwall & Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou, 2012. "Sentiment strength detection for the social web," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 163-173, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Varkevisser & Frédérique Franken & Stéphanie Geest & Erik Schut, 2023. "Competition and collaboration in health care: reconciling the irreconcilable? Lessons from The Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(7), pages 1019-1021, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agrawal, Shiv Ratan & Mittal, Divya, 2022. "Optimizing customer engagement content strategy in retail and E-tail: Available on online product review videos," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Young Bin Kim & Sang Hyeok Lee & Shin Jin Kang & Myung Jin Choi & Jung Lee & Chang Hun Kim, 2015. "Virtual World Currency Value Fluctuation Prediction System Based on User Sentiment Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Noort, Bart A.C. & Ahaus, Kees & van der Vaart, Taco & Chambers, Naomi & Sheaff, Rod, 2020. "How healthcare systems shape a purchaser’s strategies and actions when managing chronic care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(6), pages 628-638.
    4. Ping-Yu Hsu & Hong-Tsuen Lei & Shih-Hsiang Huang & Teng Hao Liao & Yao-Chung Lo & Chin-Chun Lo, 2019. "Effects of sentiment on recommendations in social network," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(2), pages 253-262, June.
    5. Luis J. Callarisa-Fiol & Miguel Ángel Moliner-Tena & Rosa Rodríguez-Artola & Javier Sánchez-García, 2023. "Entrepreneurship innovation using social robots in tourism: a social listening study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(8), pages 2945-2971, November.
    6. Annamalai, Balamurugan & Yoshida, Masayuki & Varshney, Sanjeev & Pathak, Atul Arun & Venugopal, Pingali, 2021. "Social media content strategy for sport clubs to drive fan engagement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Simon Albrecht & Bernhard Lutz & Dirk Neumann, 2020. "The behavior of blockchain ventures on Twitter as a determinant for funding success," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 241-257, June.
    8. Yankang Su & Zbigniew J. Kabala, 2023. "Public Perception of ChatGPT and Transfer Learning for Tweets Sentiment Analysis Using Wolfram Mathematica," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Yawar Abbas & M. S. I. Malik, 2023. "Defective products identification framework using online reviews," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 899-920, June.
    10. de Vries, Hein & Vahl, Jos & Muris, Jean & Evers, Silvia & van der Horst, Henriëtte & Cheung, Kei Long, 2021. "Effects of the reform of the Dutch healthcare into managed competition: Results of a Delphi study among experts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 27-33.
    11. Xiong, Xi & Li, Yuanyuan & Qiao, Shaojie & Han, Nan & Wu, Yue & Peng, Jing & Li, Binyong, 2018. "An emotional contagion model for heterogeneous social media with multiple behaviors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 185-202.
    12. Ghasem Javadi & Mohammad Taleai, 2020. "Integration of User Generated Geo-contents and Official Data to Assess Quality of Life in Intra-national Level," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 205-235, November.
    13. José Luis Ortega, 2022. "Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments: How a web journal club is used," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(5), pages 655-670, May.
    14. Qing Liu & Hosung Son, 2024. "Methods for aggregating investor sentiment from social media," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Vaughan, Liwen & Yang, Rongbin, 2013. "Web traffic and organization performance measures: Relationships and data sources examined," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 699-711.
    16. Jifeng Mu & Jonathan Zhang & Abhishek Borah & Jiayin Qi, 2022. "Creative Appeals in Firm-Generated Content and Product Performance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 18-42, March.
    17. Sandeepa Kannangara & Wayne Wobcke, 2022. "Determining political interests of issue-motivated groups on social media: joint topic models for issues, sentiment and stance," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 811-840, May.
    18. Cheng-Jun Wang & Xinzhi Zhang & Zepeng Gou & Youqin Wu, 2024. "Yesterday once more: collective storytelling and public engagement with digital cultural products on the music streaming platform," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Victoria Tur-Viñes & Araceli Castelló-Martínez, 2019. "Commenting on Top Spanish YouTubers: “No Comment”," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Miklos Sebők & Zoltán Kacsuk & Ákos Máté, 2022. "The (real) need for a human touch: testing a human–machine hybrid topic classification workflow on a New York Times corpus," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3621-3643, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:19:y:2023:i:2:p:193-219.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.