IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v12y2003i4p789-813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experience and convergence: curiosities and speculation

Author

Listed:
  • Anne S. Miner
  • Pamela R. Haunschild
  • Andreas Schwab

Abstract

Many theoretical frameworks assume that increasing organizational experience will produce convergence in problems, outcomes and activities. In this paper, we present three curiosities from field research in which increasing experience apparently generated more, not less, variability. We suggest that under plausible and even mundane conditions, experience can systematically generate variability. We describe three specific situations: (i) the interaction of experience with higher level rules; (ii) experience in novelty-rewarding or top-score-only competitive systems; and (iii) experience involving repeated vicarious learning. We explore processes that may generate variability in these contexts, and factors that may shape whether experience will generate convergence or variability over time. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne S. Miner & Pamela R. Haunschild & Andreas Schwab, 2003. "Experience and convergence: curiosities and speculation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(4), pages 789-813, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:12:y:2003:i:4:p:789-813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mooweon Rhee & Tohyun Kim, 2019. "Exploiting old lessons and exploring new ideas: A Confucian approach to exploitation and exploration," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 773-795, September.
    2. Bilian Ni Sullivan, 2010. "Competition and Beyond: Problems and Attention Allocation in the Organizational Rulemaking Process," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 432-450, April.
    3. Grazia Cecere & Muge Ozman, 2014. "Technological diversity and inventor networks," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 161-178, March.
    4. Yang, Monica & Hyland, MaryAnne, 2012. "Similarity in Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions: Imitation, Uncertainty and Experience among Chinese Firms, 1985–2006," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 352-365.
    5. Giambatista, Robert C. & Bhappu, Anita D., 2010. "Diversity's harvest: Interactions of diversity sources and communication technology on creative group performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 116-126, March.
    6. Huo, Dong & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2013. "When Category-based Indices Encounter Non-independent Categories: Solving the Taxonomy Issue in Resource-based Empirical Studies," MPRA Paper 56186, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:12:y:2003:i:4:p:789-813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.