IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v45y2018i3p433-453..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sales impacts of direct marketing choices: treatment effects with multinomial selectivity

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Park
  • Krishna Paudel
  • Seydina Sene

Abstract

Producers who are planning to sell using direct marketing to consumers only or to both consumers and retailers experience declines in total sales. Based on survey data for US farmers from 2008 to 2010, the earnings decline is 71.3 per cent when marketing direct to consumers and 36.8 per cent for the diversified marketing decision. The direct marketing penalty is robust to inclusion of important demographic factors, farm experience and use of the internet, and characteristics of the farm operation such as crop choices and input use. Direct marketing is associated with higher sales declines for female farmers, highlighting a distributional impact on farmers that has not been discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Park & Krishna Paudel & Seydina Sene, 2018. "Sales impacts of direct marketing choices: treatment effects with multinomial selectivity," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(3), pages 433-453.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:45:y:2018:i:3:p:433-453.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbx038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jichun Zhao & Hongbiao Wang & Jianxin Guo, 2021. "Smog Avoidance Investment While Improving Air Quality: Health Demand or Risk Aversion? Evidence from Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Aleksandra Tošović-Stevanović & Vladimir Ristanović & Dragan Ćalović & Goran Lalić & Milena Žuža & Gorica Cvijanović, 2020. "Small Farm Business Analysis Using the AHP Model for Efficient Assessment of Distribution Channels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Pierre Chiaverina & Sophie Drogué & Florence Jacquet & Larry Lev & Robert King, 2023. "Does short food supply chain participation improve farm economic performance? A meta‐analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(3), pages 400-413, May.
    4. Aihounton, Ghislain & Christiaensen, Luc, 2024. "Does agricultural intensification pay in the context of structural transformation?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Brian Lee & Jhih‐Yun Liu & Hung‐Hao Chang, 2020. "The choice of marketing channel and farm profitability: Empirical evidence from small farmers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 402-421, June.
    6. Lucca Zachmann & Chloe McCallum & Robert Finger, 2024. "Spraying for the beauty: Pesticide use for visual appearance in apple production," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(4), pages 621-638, July.
    7. Blaufus, Kay & Lorenz, Daniela & Milde, Michael & Peuthert, Benjamin & Schwäbe, Alexander N., 2022. "Negotiating with the tax auditor: Determinants of tax auditors' negotiation strategy choice and the effect on firms’ tax adjustments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2021. "Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Key, Nigel, . "Direct-to-Consumer Marketing and the Survival and Growth of Beginning Farms," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 49(1).
    10. Timothy Park & Steve Martinez & Mohammed Ibrahim, 2024. "Sales performance of direct food marketers: African American‐led operations," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 255-274, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:45:y:2018:i:3:p:433-453.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.