IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i6p1503-1520..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Inconvenient Truth About Mobile Phone Distraction: Understanding the Means, Motive and Opportunity for Driver Resistance to Legal and Safety Messages
[‘Changes in Driver Behaviour as a Function of Handsfree Mobile Phones – A Simulator Study’]

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Wells
  • Gemma Briggs
  • Leanne Savigar-Shaw

Abstract

Evidence for how phone-use impacts driving is clear: phone-using drivers are four times more likely to crash; demonstrate poor hazard detection ability; take longer to react to any hazards they notice; and can look yet fail to see. However, drivers are often resistant to research findings and, despite it being an enforceable offence, many still admit to using their phones. This paper combines what is known about the dangers of distracted driving with what research tells us about how drivers think about themselves, the law, and their risk of both crashing and being prosecuted. These blended insights explain why evidence may be resisted both by drivers and policymakers, highlighting the inconvenient truth of the distraction caused by mobile phone-use.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Wells & Gemma Briggs & Leanne Savigar-Shaw, 2021. "The Inconvenient Truth About Mobile Phone Distraction: Understanding the Means, Motive and Opportunity for Driver Resistance to Legal and Safety Messages [‘Changes in Driver Behaviour as a Function," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(6), pages 1503-1520.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:6:p:1503-1520.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Bittman & Judith E. Brown & Judy Wajcman, 2009. "The mobile phone, perpetual contact and time pressure," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(4), pages 673-691, December.
    2. Yunxing Chen & Rui Fu & Qingjin Xu & Wei Yuan, 2020. "Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver’s Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuning Wang & Shuocheng Yang & Jinhao Li & Shaobing Xu & Jianqiang Wang, 2023. "An Emergency Driving Intervention System Designed for Driver Disability Scenarios Based on Emergency Risk Field," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Harvey Humphrey & Edmund Coleman-Fountain, 2024. "Creating Time for LGBT+ Disabled Youth: Co-production Outside Chrononormativity," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 233-242, March.
    3. Francis Green & Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Golo Henseke, 2022. "Working Still Harder," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(2), pages 458-487, March.
    4. Gheorghe-Daniel Voinea & Răzvan Gabriel Boboc & Ioana-Diana Buzdugan & Csaba Antonya & George Yannis, 2023. "Texting While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Eva Thulin & Bertil Vilhelmson & Martina Johansson, 2019. "New Telework, Time Pressure, and Time Use Control in Everyday Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Ivory, Chris & Casey, Rebecca & Watson, Kayleigh, 2016. "The role of mobile ICT in repair worker communities of practice," 27th European Regional ITS Conference, Cambridge (UK) 2016 148676, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Rui Fu & Yunxing Chen & Qingjin Xu & Yuxi Guo & Wei Yuan, 2020. "A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Killian Mullan & Judy Wajcman, 2019. "Have Mobile Devices Changed Working Patterns in the 21st Century? A Time-diary Analysis of Work Extension in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(1), pages 3-20, February.
    9. Gregor Murray & Christian Lévesque & Glenn Morgan & Nicolas Roby, 2020. "Disruption and re-regulation in work and employment: from organisational to institutional experimentation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 135-156, May.
    10. Răzvan Gabriel Boboc & Gheorghe Daniel Voinea & Ioana-Diana Buzdugan & Csaba Antonya, 2022. "Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Siddharth Vedula & Phillip H. Kim, 2018. "Marching to the beat of the drum: the impact of the pace of life in US cities on entrepreneurial work effort," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 569-590, March.
    12. Jinbi Yang & Chunxiao Yin, 2020. "Exploring Boundary Conditions of the Impact of Accessibility to Mobile Networks on Employees’ Perceptions of Presenteeism: from Both Individual and Social Perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 881-895, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:6:p:1503-1520.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.