IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v34y2010i1p77-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On making infrastructure visible: putting the non-humans to rights

Author

Listed:
  • Trevor Pinch

Abstract

Using the author's own experiences in local politics, the paper examines several cases in which pieces of mundane infrastructure are contested. The cases include eruvs, traffic-calming technologies, and invisible dog fences. The argument is that in contra distinction to abstract philosophical approaches to technology, the social construction of technology (SCOT) needs to return to the examination of the mundane embeddedness of technologies in everyday life. It is argued that an adequate approach to the role of the human and the non-human should not buy into a distinction between ontology and epistemology but instead should focus upon the contested interaction of humans and non-humans in everyday life and thereby restore the analysis of intentionality and meaning to its rightful place at the core of the sociology of technology. Copyright The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Trevor Pinch, 2010. "On making infrastructure visible: putting the non-humans to rights," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 77-89, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:77-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bep044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Latham, Alan & Nattrass, Michael, 2019. "Autonomous vehicles, car-dominated environments, and cycling: Using an ethnography of infrastructure to reflect on the prospects of a new transportation technology," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Philip Faulkner & Clive Lawson & Jochen Runde, 2010. "Theorising technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Alan Latham & Peter R H Wood, 2015. "Inhabiting Infrastructure: Exploring the Interactional Spaces of Urban Cycling," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 300-319, February.
    4. A. Marissa Matsler & Thaddeus R. Miller & Peter M. Groffman, 2021. "The Eco-Techno Spectrum: Exploring Knowledge Systems’ Challenges in Green Infrastructure Management," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 49-62.
    5. Madsen, Herle Mo & Brown, Rebekah & Elle, Morten & Mikkelsen, Peter Steen, 2017. "Social construction of stormwater control measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen: A discourse analysis of technological change, embedded meanings and potential mainstreaming," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 198-209.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:77-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.