IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v110y2023i3p579-595..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal design of the Barker proposal and other locally balanced Metropolis–Hastings algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Jure Vogrinc
  • Samuel Livingstone
  • Giacomo Zanella

Abstract

SummaryWe study the class of first-order locally balanced Metropolis–Hastings algorithms introduced in Livingstone & Zanella (2022). To choose a specific algorithm within the class, the user must select a balancing functionsatisfyingand a noise distribution for the proposal increment. Popular choices within the class are the Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm and the recently introduced Barker proposal. We first establish a general limiting optimal acceptance rate of 57 and scaling of , as the dimensiontends to infinity among all members of the class under mild smoothness assumptions onand when the target distribution for the algorithm is of product form. In particular, we obtain an explicit expression for the asymptotic efficiency of an arbitrary algorithm in the class, as measured by expected squared jumping distance. We then consider how to optimize this expression under various constraints. We derive an optimal choice of noise distribution for the Barker proposal, an optimal choice of balancing function under a Gaussian noise distribution, and an optimal choice of first-order locally balanced algorithm among the entire class, which turns out to depend on the specific target distribution. Numerical simulations confirm our theoretical findings, and in particular, show that a bimodal choice of noise distribution in the Barker proposal gives rise to a practical algorithm that is consistently more efficient than the original Gaussian version.

Suggested Citation

  • Jure Vogrinc & Samuel Livingstone & Giacomo Zanella, 2023. "Optimal design of the Barker proposal and other locally balanced Metropolis–Hastings algorithms," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(3), pages 579-595.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:3:p:579-595.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asac056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giacomo Zanella, 2020. "Informed Proposals for Local MCMC in Discrete Spaces," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(530), pages 852-865, April.
    2. Gareth O. Roberts & Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, 1998. "Optimal scaling of discrete approximations to Langevin diffusions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(1), pages 255-268.
    3. Zanella, Giacomo & Bédard, Mylène & Kendall, Wilfrid S., 2017. "A Dirichlet form approach to MCMC optimal scaling," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(12), pages 4053-4082.
    4. Samuel Livingstone & Giacomo Zanella, 2022. "The Barker proposal: Combining robustness and efficiency in gradient‐based MCMC," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(2), pages 496-523, April.
    5. Peter Neal & Gareth Roberts, 2011. "Optimal Scaling of Random Walk Metropolis Algorithms with Non-Gaussian Proposals," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 583-601, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jun & Roberts, Gareth O. & Rosenthal, Jeffrey S., 2020. "Optimal scaling of random-walk metropolis algorithms on general target distributions," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(10), pages 6094-6132.
    2. Samuel Livingstone & Giacomo Zanella, 2022. "The Barker proposal: Combining robustness and efficiency in gradient‐based MCMC," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(2), pages 496-523, April.
    3. Kamatani, Kengo, 2020. "Random walk Metropolis algorithm in high dimension with non-Gaussian target distributions," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 297-327.
    4. Quan Zhou & Jun Yang & Dootika Vats & Gareth O. Roberts & Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, 2022. "Dimension‐free mixing for high‐dimensional Bayesian variable selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1751-1784, November.
    5. Jorge I. Figueroa-Zúñiga & Cristian L. Bayes & Víctor Leiva & Shuangzhe Liu, 2022. "Robust beta regression modeling with errors-in-variables: a Bayesian approach and numerical applications," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 919-942, June.
    6. Mamatzakis, Emmanuel C. & Tsionas, Mike G., 2021. "Making inference of British household's happiness efficiency: A Bayesian latent model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 312-326.
    7. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    8. Delis, Manthos D. & Tsionas, Mike G., 2018. "Measuring management practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 65-77.
    9. Dalalyan, Arnak S. & Karagulyan, Avetik, 2019. "User-friendly guarantees for the Langevin Monte Carlo with inaccurate gradient," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(12), pages 5278-5311.
    10. Aknouche, Abdelhakim & Dimitrakopoulos, Stefanos, 2020. "On an integer-valued stochastic intensity model for time series of counts," MPRA Paper 105406, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Arnak S. Dalalyan, 2017. "Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densities," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 651-676, June.
    12. O. F. Christensen & J. Møller & R. P. Waagepetersen, 2001. "Geometric Ergodicity of Metropolis-Hastings Algorithms for Conditional Simulation in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 309-327, September.
    13. M Ludkin & C Sherlock, 2023. "Hug and hop: a discrete-time, nonreversible Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(2), pages 301-318.
    14. Tsionas, Mike G. & Michaelides, Panayotis G., 2017. "Neglected chaos in international stock markets: Bayesian analysis of the joint return–volatility dynamical system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 95-107.
    15. G. O. Roberts & O. Stramer, 2002. "Langevin Diffusions and Metropolis-Hastings Algorithms," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 337-357, December.
    16. Shao, Wei & Guo, Guangbao & Meng, Fanyu & Jia, Shuqin, 2013. "An efficient proposal distribution for Metropolis–Hastings using a B-splines technique," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 465-478.
    17. Anandamayee Majumdar & Corinna Gries & Jason Walker, 2011. "A non-stationary spatial generalized linear mixed model approach for studying plant diversity," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1935-1950, October.
    18. Reihaneh Entezari & Patrick E. Brown & Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, 2020. "Bayesian spatial analysis of hardwood tree counts in forests via MCMC," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), June.
    19. N. Englezos & X. Kartala & P. Koundouri & M. Tsionas & A. Alamanos, 2023. "A Novel HydroEconomic - Econometric Approach for Integrated Transboundary Water Management Under Uncertainty," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(4), pages 975-1030, April.
    20. Moffa, Giusi & Kuipers, Jack, 2014. "Sequential Monte Carlo EM for multivariate probit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 252-272.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:3:p:579-595.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.