IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i3p329-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male courtship signals and female signal assessment in Photinus greeni fireflies

Author

Listed:
  • Constantinos I. Michaelidis
  • Kristian C. Demary
  • Sara M. Lewis

Abstract

The evolutionary dynamic of courtship signaling systems is driven by the interaction between male trait distributions and female preferences. This interaction is complex because females may choose mates based on multiple components of male signals, and female preference functions may vary depending on mate availability, female reproductive state, and environmental conditions. In Photinus fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae), flying males emit bioluminescent flash signals to locate sedentary females, which reply selectively to attractive male flash signals with their own response flash. In this study, we first examined temporal variation in the paired-pulse flash patterns produced by Photinus greeni males in the field and found significant among-male variation (∼70% of total variation) in interpulse intervals (IPIs). There was no significant relationship between male IPI and spermatophore size, suggesting that P. greeni male courtship signals do not provide females with reliable indicators of male material resources. In laboratory playback experiments, we presented P. greeni females with simulated flash signals to assess how IPI and pulse duration independently affected the likelihood of female flash response. We also examined the effects of female body mass and time during the mating season on female preference functions, hypothesizing that females would be less discriminating when they were heavier (more fecund) and when mate availability declined. We found that P. greeni females discriminated among signals within their species' range based primarily on flash pattern IPI. Neither the time during the mating season nor female weight altered female preference functions for IPI, although season did influence female response to pulse duration. These results reveal that P. greeni females discriminate among conspecific males based primarily on male IPIs, the same signal character previously shown to be important for firefly species recognition. Field playback experiments indicated that female responsiveness peaked near the average IPI given by males at different ambient temperatures, suggesting that fireflies exhibit temperature coupling similar to that seen in many acoustically signaling animals. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantinos I. Michaelidis & Kristian C. Demary & Sara M. Lewis, 2006. "Male courtship signals and female signal assessment in Photinus greeni fireflies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 329-335, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:329-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liam R Dougherty, 2023. "The effect of individual state on the strength of mate choice in females and males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 197-209.
    2. Terry J Ord & Judy A Stamps, 2017. "Why does the rate of signal production in ectotherms vary with temperature?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1272-1282.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:329-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.